Transubstantiation Post From Long Ago

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hope1960
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Hope1960

Guest
I was reading over some old posts on Transubstantiation from May 05. A poster named kmmd went to a church seminar on The Year of the Eucharist, where her priest said they no longer have to believe in Transubstantiation.

Has the Church changed it’s mind on this teaching?
Will the Church ever change its teaching on this?

I certainly hope not.
 
Last edited:
No hope, no.

Why would you even believe this, or if questioning it,

And not firstly refer to the catechism?

Also you are reading hearsay from a dodgy internet space. Read the catechism
 
Last edited:
Because she said this information came from her priest and this was a CAF post, plus he said this after the Catechism was written.
 
Last edited:
But you have no idea what the context was, in 2005.

Read the catechism. It’s much more fruitful then reading confusing threads that can’t be clarified
 
“Transubstantiation” refers to the change of the bread and wine to the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.

This is a dogma and can never be changed:
“Christ becomes present in the Sacrament of the Altar by the transformation of the whole substance of the bread into His Body and of the whole substance of the wine into His Blood”
Click to expand...
 
I know the context. It was the first post and the OP got right to the point.
 
Last edited:
40.png
transubstantiation Apologetics
I attended a lecture the other evening that our parish was having to celebrate the Year of the Eucharist. The priest said that we don’t have to believe in transubstantiation any more. I wish I had taken better notes, but my heart was so heavy. The whole evening was about Jesus’s presence at Mass everywhere but in the Eucharist. Pray for us in the Diocese of Rochester.
Click to expand...
Here’s the post.
 
Hope it can never change.

There is absolutely no guarantee that person who posted, actually fully listened or understood what the Priest was saying.
It’s great to question things like that though.

Be at peace.

Praying for your health.
🙏🕊️🌹
 
Last edited:
You mean this dogma of transubstantiation can never change, right?

Thank you for praying for my health. Much appreciated.
 
It has been infallibly defined as dogma, and even if it hadn’t, we know from the early days of Christianity, that the early Church believed that bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ, nothing has changed. This is the teaching from Jesus Christ himself.
 
Right

It can never ever change.

Think about why.

🕊️🙏🌹
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is dogma and cannot be changed. It was defined at the Council of Trent.
 
No the Church has not changed that teaching,

No it will never change that teaching.

That Priest was preaching heresy (or the OP of that old thread misunderstood him)
 
Last edited:
Hope1960 said:
Because she said this information came from her priest and this was a CAF post, plus he said this after the Catechism was written.
Click to expand...
Priests make mistakes, they are human. Lay people make mistakes, sometimes they misunderstand what a priest is saying.

We always have the documents of the Church to read.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top