**God bless MT1926,
Thank you for your post.**
Jimmy Akin’s article is very good, explained everything.
It was a misunderstanding. It is all fine, I don’t concern about that subject.
About Dr. Anders. Unfortunately three years ago I lost 90 % of my hearing so I can’t hear his teachings.
It would be interesting to know his teaching on the subject, but I only can study printed material.
At this stage I cannot imagine that better not to know our future than to know.
If he has any printed material on the subject I would like to read it.
So, all Fine. God bless.
LatinRight
Latin. Thanks for the response and thanks for reading Jimmy’s article.
I’m sorry about your hearing. I really enjoy Dr. Anders, wish you could listen to him.
He has a website with his articles here:
calvin2catholic.com/
I typed out a transcript of the episode I wanted you to listen to. I hope this helps.
**Tom Price: **
Let’s get to the phones here at 1-800-585-9396 with a line open for you right now. Let’s go to a Jennifer now in Morton Illinois listening to us on Saint Bernadette radio. Jennifer what’s your question today?
Jennifer:
Hi I feel like I am torn between Catholicism and Protestantism. I was raised Catholic but I’ve had a lot of protestant influence in my life and I think……… I know you’ve made the journey from Protestantism to Catholicism and I would like to know what you think about………I guess what set me over the edge was….I prefer in the Protestant world knowing that I’m going to heaven because of my faith versus in Catholicism you’re not sure and you’re working on it all the time. And I just wonder how you got over that………
Dr. Anders:
Great question! I really appreciate it, thank you so much. I understand what it feels like to be caught between traditions. I definitely experienced that anxiety myself and, well I hope that everyone come to faith in Christ in the Catholic Church. I don’t wish on anybody, the kind of existential angst that I experienced in my own journey. It was considerable, it was tough, and I have a lot of sympathy for people who are having difficulty with it.
So you are absolutely right that the Protestant tradition teaches that a man could have infallible certainly, a woman for that matter to, a person could have infallible certainty of their salvation. That is a dogma of the Protestant faith, especially the Calvinist tradition. So Westminster confession of faith, this is a Presbyterian confession of faith, teaches as a dogma that a person can have in fallible, they use the word infallible, infallible certainty of salvation. OK that’s the dogma.
Now there are only two ways, and consider what’s being offered, what’s being proposed, is that I can know within infallible certainty, from a Protestant, so the claim is made, a future event.
Right? That’s what is being claimed. That’s what is being taught. That I can have infallible certainty of a future event. Namely my own eternal salvation in heaven. Right?
How could I know that?
How could I know that?
There are only two ways you could know that, if that were true. I don’t think it’s true, only 2 ways you could know.
One of them would be direct revelation from God. Right? Because we’re talking about the future.
God could lean down and say, Yo Dave! I promise you, you will have eternal life, period. Directly, he could say that to me.
The other, and this is the way they actually operate. OK? The other is an inference from religious experience. So the Protestant argument would run like this………
It would say…. God promises eternal life unconditionally, to those that have true faith. Alright? That’s the argument.
Now I don’t think Scripture says that.
I think they’re exegesis of the Bible is bad, but does the promise, that’s the last of position. God promises with infallible certainty of salvation to those that have true faith. Alright? But there’s a condition in there. You have to be subjectively certain that you have true faith. Alright? So you have to be able to accurately discern the quality of your religious experience, to know that your faith is so called “True Faith”.
Now here’s the difficulty if your Protestant. Everybody knows the experience of those, like in the parable of the four soil’s, who give some public evidence of faith and then fall away. And the common retort in Protestant circles is well they never really had true faith. They’re faith was spurious, it was a genuine.
OK, well that raises a question.
Let us say that I believe myself to have true faith. How can I know that my faith is not spurious faith? That it is not the appearance of faith and not the genuine article?
In coarse the reformers address that.
John Calvin, who really is the author of this theology, deals with the problem of spurious faith. That some people can give the appearance of true faith, but their, their subsequent falling away shows they never really had it.
Alright? So you’re left with a dilemma.
How do I discern if my faith is real genuine faith or spurious faith, that might fade.?
In which case my conviction, my subjective convention, convection that I have a eternal life is in fact false. That it’s not genuine.
A friend of mine put the dilemma this way, he says the elect know for sure that they’re going to heaven and I might be one of them.
OK?
Continued in next post…