V
ValiantDomain
Guest
I don’t know if this is in the right forum or not…please feel free to move it…
I hate to admit it, but I’ve always struggled with the Trinity.
It’s not that I don’t believe in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit…but I’m confused as pertaining to their relationship one to the other. While I’m not intellectually challenged (because I do enjoy reading philosophy and theology
), all of the theological treatises dealing with the Trinity seem to run circles around my head with talk of “homoousios” and “one essence but three persons.” Even the Catechism’s definition perplexes me slightly:
The Trinity is One. We do not confess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the “consubstantial Trinity”.83 The divine persons do not share the one divinity among themselves but each of them is God whole and entire: "The Father is that which the Son is, the Son that which the Father is, the Father and the Son that which the Holy Spirit is, i.e. by nature one God."84 In the words of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), “Each of the persons is that supreme reality, viz., the divine substance, essence or nature.”
“Each of them is God whole and entire”? Is that like saying if I have one orange, separate it into three sections, then each section is God whole and entire? It’s “essence” would be that it was an orange but in three segments (persons)?
Any previous discussions, html links, or whatever else would be greatly appreciated. I’d rather correct my understandings early on than to possibly continue drifting in the wrong direction.
I hate to admit it, but I’ve always struggled with the Trinity.
The Trinity is One. We do not confess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the “consubstantial Trinity”.83 The divine persons do not share the one divinity among themselves but each of them is God whole and entire: "The Father is that which the Son is, the Son that which the Father is, the Father and the Son that which the Holy Spirit is, i.e. by nature one God."84 In the words of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), “Each of the persons is that supreme reality, viz., the divine substance, essence or nature.”
“Each of them is God whole and entire”? Is that like saying if I have one orange, separate it into three sections, then each section is God whole and entire? It’s “essence” would be that it was an orange but in three segments (persons)?
Any previous discussions, html links, or whatever else would be greatly appreciated. I’d rather correct my understandings early on than to possibly continue drifting in the wrong direction.