R
Rockoh22
Guest
This is great news. I pray for peace most nights.
To put this in perspective, it is worth noting who is entitled to nominate people for the prize:This is great news. I pray for peace most nights.
Too funny, too predictableAnd now The Atlantic suggests this award should be eliminated.
What did Obama do to earn the prize? I’ve never really know why exactly he was chosen.President Trump has accomplished something to earn
a nomination which is more than can be said for Barack Obama
Can you tell us where Obama brought peace please? What was this for?As we should see from @EmilyAlexandra’s post above, being nominated for it is very different from winning it. Obama did win it. After Trump wins it then you can celebrate with some justification. But just being nominated - not so much.
With all due respect to all, I think it was because he was the first bi-racial President. I don’t think the achievement goes beyond this.What did Obama do to earn the prize? I’ve never really know why exactly he was chosen.
I’m not sure that I understand you. I am just pointing out that being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize means virtually nothing. All that it requires is being nominated by one of the people qualified to make nominations. That includes every member of the legislatures and governments of 193 countries (and presumably some officials at the Holy See) and every judge belonging to some two dozen international courts. As for universities, estimates of the number of universities in the world range from 20,000 to 40,000, which means that there must be hundreds of thousands of chancellors and professors across five academic disciplines. Many of these people will be fairly unremarkable; some will be of rather dubious character.So those handful of people having issues in their past makes all of them suspect? Sounds so dismissive, as though the Nobel Peace Prize means nothing. A lot like a child who doesn’t get picked first for a game saying, “I don’t want to play anyway!” while stomping away.
That’s insane! When I think of a prize like this I think of people who actually made real change in the world, where their life’s work or mission was to make things better for all. I always think of Mother Teresa when I hear Nobel Peace Prize and what she did for the world.Horton:![]()
With all due respect to all, I think it was because he was the first bi-racial President. I don’t think the achievement goes beyond this.What did Obama do to earn the prize? I’ve never really know why exactly he was chosen.
If you are on the Nobel committee, I suggest you make that argument when the topic comes up. Or write them right now and see if you can convince them. But convincing us does nothing to win Trump the prize.This literally makes no sense. You guys are discussing about who can nominate and people with shady past, who nominate. Come on. This is a huge step for peace. Why? Because the Middle East has been unstable for a really long time.
The prize is the least of this news. The reality is the real reason. Peace!But convincing us does nothing to win Trump the prize.
Is Trump really responsible? Let’s see what Martin Indyk, Distinguished Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former U.S. Ambassador to Israel and U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations thinks:Normalizing relations in the Middle East is tricky business. Trump getting the Prize, is cool, but the normalizations? That is Awesome!