T
Theo520
Guest
This sort of action should have been in Obama’s ACA, since it actually addresses the ‘affordable’ bit.
Still, the order does not look to lower drug prices for people who are not on Medicare.
The pharmaceutical industry quickly blasted the surprise move and raised the idea of suing to stop it.
“With scientists and researchers at America’s biopharmaceutical companies working around the clock to fight a deadly pandemic, it is simply dumbfounding that the Trump administration would move forward with its threat to import foreign price controls and the inevitable delays to innovation that will follow,” said Michelle McMurry-Heath, CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization.
She said the industry will “use every tool available – including legal action if necessary – to fight this risky foreign price control scheme.”
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who has long pushed for strong action to lower drug prices, dismissed the move as a pre-election stunt by Trump, with few details, “after failing to lower any prices during almost four years.”
“Trump aims to make a misleading headline for his failing campaign, not a genuine difference for victims of price gouging,” Doggett said in a statement.
Maybe we will find out when we see whether or not this executive order actually lowers drug prices. Then and only then can Trump supporters crow about how Trump did something that Obama couldn’t.But why did Obama leave this to his successors, that’s what I really want to know.
Because Obama, like Trump and Republicans and Democrats, serves capital. If Trump and the Republicans were going to do anything about drug prices they’d have done it when they controlled the legislature.But why did Obama leave this to his successors, that’s what I really want to know.
Yes far more can be done, but this is directionally good and targeted at those most needy.The rest of the article:
Directions to point and targets to aim at don’t actually mean anything unless the arrow moves somewhere.LeafByNiggle:![]()
Yes far more can be done, but this is directionally good and targeted at those most needy.The rest of the article:
Well it’s a fact that Obama didn’t reduce drug prices.Maybe we will find out when we see whether or not this executive order actually lowers drug prices. Then and only then can Trump supporters crow about how Trump did something that Obama couldn’t.
I doubt it was for lack of trying.LeafByNiggle:![]()
Well it’s a fact that Obama didn’t reduce drug prices.Maybe we will find out when we see whether or not this executive order actually lowers drug prices. Then and only then can Trump supporters crow about how Trump did something that Obama couldn’t.
Why do you think that important cost component was overlooked within ACA?
Because the Democrats, like Republicans, serve capital. Single payer as always is the only way out of the bipartisan horror of our health care system.Why do you think that important cost component was overlooked within ACA?
It’s very free market when the biggest volume buyer get’s best pricing.How on Earth does “linking [drug costs] to the cost of the same drugs in other nations” avoid the SOCIALISM tag?
ROFL, you’ll never be able to admit Trump does anything useful.Directions to point and targets to aim at don’t actually mean anything unless the arrow moves somewhere.
Yup. They were useful. I have always said that Trump is not a military hawk, which is a good thing.LeafByNiggle:![]()
ROFL, you’ll never be able to admit Trump does anything useful.Directions to point and targets to aim at don’t actually mean anything unless the arrow moves somewhere.
What about those Mid East peace accords, and that one in Afghanistan?
Quite a few members of the GOP are in the pocket of big pharma, and use their talking points.A shockingly similar plan proposed by Nancy Pelosi was called “Socialist” by McConnell last year.
“Socialist price controls will do a lot of left-wing damage to the healthcare system. And of course we’re not going to be calling up a bill like that.”
I don’t know that the outcomes are going to be any different given the influence on Congress that Big Pharma and other large health care entities have. Just as they shut the consumer out of the deliberations over the ACA, they again will shut the consumer out of the single payer deliberations. It is not for nothing that Big Pharma spends the most lobbying dollars in DC. But some insist on believing Big Pharma aren’t about the money. Nothing illegal about what they do, to be sure, it was signed into law by Obama, but the fact that what they do is legal should anger many more of us than it does.Single payer as always is the only way out of the bipartisan horror of our health care system.
I more or less agree with you. I think this plan is broadly a good idea, I’m mostly curious about how people (like McConnell) who have condemned similar plans in the past as “socialist” will justify this one.Calling contracted ‘best pricing’ as price control is dishonest, this clause is included in many purchasing contracts, it’s capitalism.