R
Reformed_Rob
Guest
Hi,
I’m reading this book by Abbot Vonier, called “A Key to the Doctrine of the Eucharist.”
First, let me say this is a great book. Some of it, honestly, is a little hard to grasp. Vonier is a Thomistic theologian, and does a good job of bringing out some of Aquinas’ advanced concepts, and explains them colloquially quite well. But still, some of it hard to get.
The thing I’m wondering about is about Sacraments in general. He says that they are basically in a completely different plane of existence than both the heavenly and earthly realms. This was completely new to me, and he spent just a few pages talking about it and moved on.
Here’s the essence of what he said:
I’m reading this book by Abbot Vonier, called “A Key to the Doctrine of the Eucharist.”
First, let me say this is a great book. Some of it, honestly, is a little hard to grasp. Vonier is a Thomistic theologian, and does a good job of bringing out some of Aquinas’ advanced concepts, and explains them colloquially quite well. But still, some of it hard to get.
The thing I’m wondering about is about Sacraments in general. He says that they are basically in a completely different plane of existence than both the heavenly and earthly realms. This was completely new to me, and he spent just a few pages talking about it and moved on.
Here’s the essence of what he said:
The sacramental world is a new world created by God, entirely different from the world of nature and even from the world of spirits. It would be poor theology to say that in the sacraments we have here on earth modes of spiritual realities which resemble the ways of the angels. We have nothing of the kind. Were we to speak with the tongues of angels it would not help us in the least to express the sacramental realities.They are not veiling anything; they are complete realities in themselves, existing in their own right.The sacramental world is truly a mystical world in the best sense of the word: it is reality without fixity of being.Wow, that was food for thought! I read that chapter two times this week, and while I’m confident that I basically understand what he is saying, I’m wondering can anyone else sort of chip in something you’ve read that can help me understand it better?If a sacrament were a fixed being in its natural condition, radiating forth grace and life, it would not be a sacrament. With all its realism, a sacrament is a power which is transient, and incomplete as a natural being.