Tucson rallies to protect girl's family from Westboro Baptist Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black_Knight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let us just say that the rest of the Baptist tradition in the form of the American Baptist Church,Southern Baptist Church,Baptist World Alliance,etc does not exactly want a bar of these ones in the Westboro Baptist Church.
 
yes it does but they have the right to practice their speech in a public location.

so if they actually protested then nothing should actually happen to them only if they broke the law in someway, attacked someone, or trespassed on private property.

in the pro life movement you have to deal with this all the time becuase sidewalk councilors are seen the same as WBC by the pro choice crowd, and they do what ever they can to shut us up.

again I support WBC right to protest but I don’t support their protest.
I don’t understand how they do, really. If someone says the N word to a bunch of black people in a public place, those people can sue quite successfully for emotional stress/trauma caused. The WBC is causing obvious emotional stress and trauma and from what I can tell, that actually seems to be their purpose to an extent, and yet by contrast they get away with it easily.
 
I don’t understand how they do, really. If someone says the N word to a bunch of black people in a public place, those people can sue quite successfully for emotional stress/trauma caused. The WBC is causing obvious emotional stress and trauma and from what I can tell, that actually seems to be their purpose to an extent, and yet by contrast they get away with it easily.
that’s a different issue,

the Constitution is clear on this, you have a the right to free speech
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
yes it does but they have the right to practice their speech in a public location.

so if they actually protested then nothing should actually happen to them only if they broke the law in someway, attacked someone, or trespassed on private property.

in the pro life movement you have to deal with this all the time becuase sidewalk councilors are seen the same as WBC by the pro choice crowd, and they do what ever they can to shut us up.

again I support WBC right to protest but I don’t support their protest.
At a funeral for a 9 year old girl?

Lord have mercy.
 
At a funeral for a 9 year old girl?

Lord have mercy.
i never said I support what they are doing or what they are doing is good but I support their right (first amendment right) to do it.
 
i never said I support what they are doing or what they are doing is good but I support their right (first amendment right) to do it.
But the first amendment is not absolute either. The Supreme Court has said so. For instance, we can’t yell “Fire” in a movie theatre for the obvious reason even though it would infringe on that person’s right to free speech.

I would also imagine I can’t yell, “There’s a bomb” in any airport without legal repercussions.
 
But the first amendment is not absolute either. The Supreme Court has said so. For instance, we can’t yell “Fire” in a movie theatre for the obvious reason even though it would infringe on that person’s right to free speech.

I would also imagine I can’t yell, “There’s a bomb” in any airport without legal repercussions.
they should have a right to protest if they want to as long as they put noone in danger and as long as they stay on a public side walk that shouldn’t happen.
 
they should have a right to protest if they want to as long as they put noone in danger and as long as they stay on a public side walk that shouldn’t happen.
In the court, of course you would win, but that’s an awfully short sighted view.

Lord have mercy.
 
In the court, of course you would win, but that’s an awfully short sighted view.

Lord have mercy.
i guess my libertarian views are coming out a little bit.

I just think we should stick closer to the constitution, I don’t think someone should be denied their free speech if their protest could be offensive. Keep in mind if we say we can deny free speech becuase it is offensive then lots of pro life groups would get denied their free speech.
 
i guess my libertarian views are coming out a little bit.

I just think we should stick closer to the constitution, I don’t think someone should be denied their free speech if their protest could be offensive. Keep in mind if we say we can deny free speech becuase it is offensive then lots of pro life groups would get denied their free speech.
Offensive yes, but causing deliberate pain and cruelty, no. Saying the truth about abortion can be quite offensive to some people but it isn’t cruelty.
 
Offensive yes, but causing deliberate pain and cruelty, no. Saying the truth about abortion can be quite offensive to some people but it isn’t cruelty.
i see your point here maybe you are right maybe if its emotional damaging to people they shouldn’t have it but IDK.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top