N
Nom_the_Wise
Guest
Lest you and I (kargo27) cause further scandal, here’s a link to an article from the Chicago Tribune:
chicagotribune.com/news/custom/religion/chi-060612-lagoprofile,0,7464548.story
The priest they discuss in the article was on our formation staff (I knew him and never suspected) and his conviction came after both he and I were long gone from the seminary. But Jimmy Lago is heading up as close to a “task force” as you can get in Chicago, the first layman ever to hold the office of Chancellor. His resume is impressive to say the least. I have met Mr. Lago one-on-one and he is a formidible man, and a man of God as well.
And, to be fair, not all homosexuals are pedophiles by default. There are heterosexual pedophiles as well (and women pedophiles, i.e. Mary Kay Letourneau). I attended a Vicariate meeting in Chicago once (back in '92 when I worked in youth ministry and they were giving guidelines of how to minister to youth) where they showed that all professions have a percentage of pedophiles, and that the priesthood actually has the *least *percentage (but that was '92 and I don’t have current numbers). When a pedophile becomes a priest, it’s different of course because the priest acts “in Persona Christi” to the community, and is therefore “Tonight’s Top Story…” It is a reflection on the media that only the Catholic Church ever had so much international publicity when pedophilia itself is a mental disorder which affects every profession. If every instance of pedophilia were given national publicity, news stations wouldn’t be able to broadcast any other news. So they were selective, to the detriment of the Church (and I’m slow to say satan’s hand can be seen in that, but more so the Hand of God. If anyone is going to get nailed to a cross, it might as well be us). I’m going to regret writing that, if only for the fear of someone misinterpreting what I’m trying to say. I thank God that we’re having such a public house cleaning on some levels, and I thank God that our Church is being called to a higher level of culpability (and I thank God for Jimmy Lago). And as someone that witnessed sexual abuse first hand as a child (my best friend) I commiserate with the suffering of those victims.
The other thread in the Vocations Forum “Vocation for repentant homosexuals” is discussing homosexual vocations quite vigorously, so I’ll leave that to them, and invite anyone reading along here to visit that thread and post. I get too worked up when I read it, and so I’ll refrain from posting there.
In the epistles, Paul lumps homosexuality right in with drunkards and people who swear. (I’m getting ready for work so I don’t have time to look it up–I might be incorrect). I think our ministerial attitude toward homosexuals should be on equal par to the others listed, and I do sense your bitterness towards homosexuals in the church (and I confess that I share it) but the best man at my wedding was a homosexual (my *best *friend from the seminary whom “discovered” he was gay when he went to the major seminary and consequently left
) Several of my friends (including him) went to the major seminary and inexplicably left within the first few months of their stay there. They didn’t want to talk about it.
This happened once, and I cannot verify it beyond giving you my word that the person that told me it is an honest man and is now ordained. During his first weeks in the major seminary Cardinal George (newly appointed as Cardinal) came to meet the major seminarians and was challenged by one of them publicly. I have to believe I’m paraphrasing despite my use of quotations, but he said “When will you at last ordain women to the priesthood?” The Cardinal (allegedly) replied “If you think women can be ordained then that means that you do not understand the character of the priesthood, and therefore I cannot ordain you.” (emphasis mine, and it must be considered a paraphrase, and second hand info). That shut him up quick.
To bring this back into the spirit of the thread, yes, this was the major scandal that I had while discerning priesthood; the depth of the misunderstanding, by seminarians, of our deepest held theology, and at times the *willful *desire to misappropriate it.
Again back when I was in seminary, I prayed to God so hard to lift my anger towards my homosexual classmates from me. We had a reconcilliation service there once with visiting priests and I went to one of the priests that was not from our formation staff and began to confess with this preface: “Father, I have so much anger towards some of my brother seminarians. I know of several whom are dating each other and…”
The priest cut me off saying “What? Are you jealous?”

chicagotribune.com/news/custom/religion/chi-060612-lagoprofile,0,7464548.story
The priest they discuss in the article was on our formation staff (I knew him and never suspected) and his conviction came after both he and I were long gone from the seminary. But Jimmy Lago is heading up as close to a “task force” as you can get in Chicago, the first layman ever to hold the office of Chancellor. His resume is impressive to say the least. I have met Mr. Lago one-on-one and he is a formidible man, and a man of God as well.
And, to be fair, not all homosexuals are pedophiles by default. There are heterosexual pedophiles as well (and women pedophiles, i.e. Mary Kay Letourneau). I attended a Vicariate meeting in Chicago once (back in '92 when I worked in youth ministry and they were giving guidelines of how to minister to youth) where they showed that all professions have a percentage of pedophiles, and that the priesthood actually has the *least *percentage (but that was '92 and I don’t have current numbers). When a pedophile becomes a priest, it’s different of course because the priest acts “in Persona Christi” to the community, and is therefore “Tonight’s Top Story…” It is a reflection on the media that only the Catholic Church ever had so much international publicity when pedophilia itself is a mental disorder which affects every profession. If every instance of pedophilia were given national publicity, news stations wouldn’t be able to broadcast any other news. So they were selective, to the detriment of the Church (and I’m slow to say satan’s hand can be seen in that, but more so the Hand of God. If anyone is going to get nailed to a cross, it might as well be us). I’m going to regret writing that, if only for the fear of someone misinterpreting what I’m trying to say. I thank God that we’re having such a public house cleaning on some levels, and I thank God that our Church is being called to a higher level of culpability (and I thank God for Jimmy Lago). And as someone that witnessed sexual abuse first hand as a child (my best friend) I commiserate with the suffering of those victims.
The other thread in the Vocations Forum “Vocation for repentant homosexuals” is discussing homosexual vocations quite vigorously, so I’ll leave that to them, and invite anyone reading along here to visit that thread and post. I get too worked up when I read it, and so I’ll refrain from posting there.
In the epistles, Paul lumps homosexuality right in with drunkards and people who swear. (I’m getting ready for work so I don’t have time to look it up–I might be incorrect). I think our ministerial attitude toward homosexuals should be on equal par to the others listed, and I do sense your bitterness towards homosexuals in the church (and I confess that I share it) but the best man at my wedding was a homosexual (my *best *friend from the seminary whom “discovered” he was gay when he went to the major seminary and consequently left
This happened once, and I cannot verify it beyond giving you my word that the person that told me it is an honest man and is now ordained. During his first weeks in the major seminary Cardinal George (newly appointed as Cardinal) came to meet the major seminarians and was challenged by one of them publicly. I have to believe I’m paraphrasing despite my use of quotations, but he said “When will you at last ordain women to the priesthood?” The Cardinal (allegedly) replied “If you think women can be ordained then that means that you do not understand the character of the priesthood, and therefore I cannot ordain you.” (emphasis mine, and it must be considered a paraphrase, and second hand info). That shut him up quick.
To bring this back into the spirit of the thread, yes, this was the major scandal that I had while discerning priesthood; the depth of the misunderstanding, by seminarians, of our deepest held theology, and at times the *willful *desire to misappropriate it.
Again back when I was in seminary, I prayed to God so hard to lift my anger towards my homosexual classmates from me. We had a reconcilliation service there once with visiting priests and I went to one of the priests that was not from our formation staff and began to confess with this preface: “Father, I have so much anger towards some of my brother seminarians. I know of several whom are dating each other and…”
The priest cut me off saying “What? Are you jealous?”
