Two witnesses or half a dozen

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob_Crowley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bob_Crowley

Guest
I’ve started a blog, but at this stage it’s hardly worth reading. However I did put in this item, and I thought it might be worth repeating here. It is based on Scripture, but I’m not sure if it shouldn’t be under “spirituality”.

Here goes -

Revelation 11:1-14 Then I was given a measuring rod like a staff, and I was told, “Come and measure the temple of God and the altar and those who worship there, but do not measure the court outside the temple; leave that out, for it is given over to the nations, and they will trample over the holy city for forty-two months. And I will grant my two witnesses authority to prophesy for one thousand two hundred sixty days, wearing sackcloth.”

These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands that stand before the Lord of the earth. And if anyone wants to harm them, fire pours out from their mouth and consumes their foes; anyone who wants to harm them must be killed in this manner. They have authority to shut the sky, so that no rain may fall during the days of their prophesying, and they have authority over the waters to turn them into blood, and to strike the earth with every kind of plague, as often as they desire.

When they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up from the bottomless pit will make war on them and conquer them and kill them, and their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city that is prophetically called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified. For three and a half days members of the peoples and tribes and languages and nations will gaze at their dead bodies and refuse to allow them to be placed in a tomb; and the inhabitants of the earth will gloat over them and celebrate and exchange presents, because these two prophets had been a torment to the inhabitants of the earth.

But after the three and a half days, the breath of life from God entered them and they stood on their feet, and those who saw them were terrified. Then they heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Come up here!” And they went up to heaven while their enemies watched them. At that moment there was a great earthquake, and a tenth of the city fell; seven thousand people were killed in the earthquake, and the rest were terrified and gave glory to the God of heaven.

The second woe has passed. The third woe is coming very soon.

I don’t think anyone has adequately identified who these two witnesses are supposed to be . I’ve heard arguments ranging from the Scripture and the Church, Enoch and Elijah (who did not die, but were taken straight to heaven), down to two individuals, who would need to be “men of iron”.

The Collegeville Bible Commentary simply says, “The dominion of the gentiles is matched by the sign of the two witnesses. Two probably refers to the number of witnesses required by law. It is difficult to determine who the witnesseses are.”

The article goes on, but also mentions that “Refusal to bury a corpse was the worst punishment antiquity could imagine. An unburied corpse would render the whole city polluted. Yet Revelation shows us people staring at and even celebrating around the two corpses in the street. All the world is involved. The corpses lie there for the symbolic three and half days.”

A world which could stare at two corpses and gloat over them would necessarily be a televised world.

My own opinion is that the two witnesses are supernatural beings, who take on the form of men for the purpose of giving a drastic warning. Arguments in favour of this are that they are the two olive trees and candlesticks who stand in front of the Lord of the earth (representative of life and light); that men simply cannot hurt them, and they are easily able to destroy human enemies; the ability to consume their enemies with fire; their immense power to shut up sky and render water useless; their lack of humanitarian feeling for all the suffering they are imposing – as inhuman angels they would simply be doing their job; and the fact it takes an all-out brawl with another supernatural being, the devil, to destroy them.

That’s my opinion, for what it’s worth.

However I will tell you of the peculiar, slight embarrassing and mildly humorous twist to this chapter in my own life.

As a new Christian, starting in 1982, I became aware of direct spiritual influences rather early one, having my first “double whammy” a little over a year later. However one of the things which influenced me rather heavily in the early stages was the rise of Creation Science. I had long wondered how one reconciled Genesis with evolution.

One day I was at a Creation Science seminar at Mt. Gravatt, in Brisbane. But as I listened to one of the speakers, whom we will call “Max” (not his real name), I became aware that his voice was rather unpleasant and there was a demonic cast to his eyes. At some stages he looked at me with distaste, which was odd, since neither he nor I knew each other from a bar of soap.

Anyway it was soon over, but as I was poking around amongst the literature for sale, I became aware of a oppressive presence. But I shrugged it off.

(To be continued)
 
(Continuation of “Two witnesses or half a dozen” - due to 6000 character limit)

As a new Protestant at the time I was also rapidly becoming aware of the “Last Days” thinking which permeates Protestant culture to some extent. One day I was in a Christian book shop when I picked up a book on eschatological happenings (I think that’s the word), and the business of the “two witnesses” was mentioned. As I read it, a series of “tingles” started up. Having earlier become aware of spiritual reality and the presence of spiritual beings, I recognized this as a spiritual tag.

The “tingles” started to get quite strong, and I got to the stage where I was starting to wonder whether I might be one of the “two witnesses”!! Silly as it sounds, I wasn’t the only one. Fortunately I never really believed it, and when I was talking to one counselor, he commented, “I’m starting to wonder what’s going on! You’re the sixth witness I’ve seen in a month!”

Hence the title, “Two witnesses or half a dozen?”

A year or so later, when it had all died down and fallen away, I was talking to my pastor. He told me that “Max”, the speaker above, had nearly wrecked the Creationist ministry for which he worked. He’d been asked, regretfully, to resign.

It seemed he had written to quite a number of pastors claiming he and another fellow in their Creationist ministry were the two witnesses, and that they should be supported. The other bloke knew nothing about it. This caused great embarrassment and a lot of heartache for the ministry.

This ministry now has a Creationist museum in Kentucky. The other fellow runs it.

With hindsight then, “Max” was clearly under the delusion he was one of the “Two Witnesses” even while he was speaking at the seminar. That was the cause of the demonic appearance. At the same time the guilty spirit spotted me amongst the audience and must have thought to itself, “Well, here’s another idiot I can try it on.”

The rest is personal history, as they say. My ambitions of being a personal olive tree and candlelight to the Lord of all the earth have taken a back seat.

I think I’ll just stick to writing a blog, when I get around to it.
 
Here’s the commentary from a Catholic source, Haydock’s Catholic Bible Commentary, 1859 edition haydock1859.tripod.com/id297.html

Ver. 3. My two witnesses…shall prophesy twelve hundred and sixty days. It is a very common interpretation, that by these two witnesses must be understood Henoch[Enoch] and Elias[Elijah], who are to come before the end of the world. It is true this is what we read in several of the ancient Fathers, insomuch, that Dr. Wells, in his paraphrase, calls it the “consent of the primitive fathers,” and in his notes says, it is of “unexceptionable authority.” This opinion (at least as to Elias) is grounded on those words of the prophet Malachy, (Malachias iv. 5.) behold, I will send you Elias, the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord; and also on the words of our Saviour, Christ, (Matthew xvii. 11.) where he tells his disciples: Elias indeed shall come, and restore all things. But I cannot say that the consent of the fathers is so unanimous as to Henoch: for we find by St. Hilary, that some thought Jeremy[Jeremiah] was to come with Elias, and he himself thought that with Elias would come Moses. See his commentary on Matt., p. 710, Nov. edit. Secondly, allowing it a received opinion that Henoch and Elias are again to come before the day of judgment, yet it is not the constant doctrine of the ancient fathers, that by these two witnesses in this place of the Apocalypse, must be understood Henoch and Elias. St. Cyprian expounds it of two sorts of martyrs for the Catholic faith; to wit, they who suffer death, and others who only suffered imprisonment, loss of goods, and the like. Others expound it of the testimonies concerning Christ and his Church, of which some are in the Old Testament, some in the New. To these we must join all those interpreters who expound all the visions and predictions in the Apocalypse, till the 20th chapter, of the persecutions raised by the Jews: or by the heathens against the Church, which have already happened. Of these, both as to ancient fathers and later interpreters, see Alcazar in his Prologomena, note 6, p. 33, and note 12, p. 48. (Witham) — Two witnesses. It is commonly understood of Henoch and Elias. (Challoner)

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, Ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark
 
Hello, Bob, and welcome to the Church!

We humans live by time. We live in a line from birth to death. God lives all around that line, so that He is present at my birth now, though I was born umpty-ump years ago. He is present in my “now.” He is already present at my death, though I am still alive. He does not progress through time like we do. (He’s the one that created time.) His name is I AM. (Ex. 3:14)

The “two messengers” passage in Revelation jumps around from the future, to the present, to the past tense. Thus, I think that we can’t tell whether the two witnesses are in the past, the present, or the future - they are in God’s time.

Be careful around the Creationists. They use some bad science, and reject some good science. Some of them manage to make idiots of themselves by ignoring mountains of evidence that contradicts their ideas. And most of them would be very happy to see you leave the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

God bless you,

Ruthie (Catholic since '06.)
 
Revelation 11:1-14
You have picked up in the middle of the narrative.
eg: look at Revelation 6:12 – the black sun – and the bloody moon.
Acts 2:15 For these are not drunk, as you suppose…
Acts 2:16 But this is that which was spoken of by the prophet Joel:
Acts 2:17 And it shall come to pass, … I will pour out of my Spirit … and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy:
…
Acts 2:19 And I will shew wonders …
Acts 2:20 The sun shall be turned into darkness and the moon into blood, before the great and manifest day of the Lord to come.
Hmm … alcohol, fire, …

These signs had already happened as Peter SAYS in reference to the prophet Joel. The sign is even repeated now…
youtube.com/watch?v=NlPHHl0AjZk

But, the point of the sign is found in the prophet Joel.
I have some small suggestions:
These are the two olive trees and the two lamp-stands that stand before the Lord of the earth. … fire pours out from their mouth and consumes their foes; anyone who wants to harm them must be killed in this manner. They have authority to shut the sky, …, and … over the waters to turn them into blood, and … every kind of plague, as often as they desire.
That is, these lamp-stands have the powers of the prophets of old – Moses (AAron), Elijah; But without understanding what it meant that Moses could turn the rivers into blood – Or Elijah shut up the waters of the sky – this passage of revelation is way too obscure.

So, let me speak in general:
Olives were used to make oil – the oil was used in the lamp-stands .
Such was the intention of the minorah (the many oil burning lamp-stand) in the Jerusalem temple up high on a hill – light to the world.

Fire is a sign of sight (light) AND purification; eg: one may clean things by burning as was Isaiah whose lips are touched by a burning altar coal.

The lamp-stands before the LORD, earlier in Revelation, referred to Churches.
These Churches did die as John warned.
 
Note: Elijah’s first coming – was John the baptist; but John was NOT Elijah the PERSON, but rather he was the Elijah the WORK.
When they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up from the bottomless pit will make war on them and … kill them, and their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city that is prophetically called Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified.
Egypt tried to destroy God’s son after being saved by him in the form of Joseph – the Israelite, Egypt repaid good with evil – so that Israelite women would be forced enter pagan LORD HUSBAND marriages.

Sodom refused to acknowledge that God SAVED them from the hands of their enemies and then, to God’s messengers, not a “thank you”, butt a f**k you.

It is in these, and other common issues between Egypt and Sodom that John the Evangelist wishes to draw one’s attention. The historical lesson of these cities;

And again, in accord with the prophecy of the sun and moon at the time of Pentecost; the city is the one where Jesus (their LORD) was crucified.

In Jerusalem, there was a Christian church and a Jewish temple. The temple of Jerusalem was destroyed with it’s lamp (which was taken as a trophy) in 70AD by the Romans, eg: the senders of Pontius pilate – the same who sentenced Jesus to death out of cowardice. So, The Evangelist is showing the theme that the fate of Jerusalem is/was known by her fruits – the inhabitants killed the son of God and then tried to force God to do things their way rather than repent – the Zealous Jews took over Jerusalem, EXPECTING a military messiah to arrive – ( And, no surprise!, Rome did burn too under Nero… )

These are some themes of this passage.

I think it a mistake to let ANYONE lead you to believe that the lamps are two individual people. There were in Jerusalem the Jews who were the light of the world through the temple, and there were Christians who Christ made the Light of the world by their way of life. Two lights in and of themselves. There may be others.
For three and a half days members of the peoples and tribes and languages and nations will gaze at their dead bodies and refuse to allow them to be placed in a tomb; and the inhabitants of the earth will gloat over them and celebrate and exchange presents, because these two prophets had been a torment to the inhabitants of the earth.
Cut an oath in half, break 7, = 3 1/2. = evil.
“the peoples, and tribes, and languages will gaze” Note :that Peter speaks to these very groups in tongues of Fire on Pentecost.
The fire burned them up – not physically – but argument wise.
Some 3000 were converted that day.
I don’t think anyone has adequately identified who these two witnesses are supposed to be . I’ve heard arguments …
… “The dominion of the gentiles is matched by the sign of the two witnesses. Two probably refers to the number of witnesses required by law. …
Two witnesses are all that are required to sentence a person to death under the law of Moses; But generally that is “Two or Three”; Two not being preferred – but GENTILES didn’t use that law. As Christians we are taught: When two or three pray in my name, there I am in their midst.
The article goes on, but also mentions that “Refusal to bury a corpse was the worst punishment antiquity could imagine. … . All the world is involved. The corpses lie there for the symbolic three and half days.”
Hmmm, I thought it was letting the dogs lick the blood up. Some other cultures burned the dead, and just left the bones piled up, Sent them to sea in an empty ship, etc…
A world which could stare at two corpses and gloat over them would necessarily be a televised world.
I think you might live in your own world – no offense. I generally Don’t watch television. There are many worlds, Internet, imaginary, physical, Roman, Jewish, … etc.
My own opinion is that the two witnesses are supernatural beings … it takes an all-out brawl with another supernatural being, the devil, to destroy them.
It takes God to allow them to die. Elijah was just a man; a just man. They who die are Martyrs. Their blood is evidence for the day of Judgment.
That’s my opinion, for what it’s worth.
O.K. Is it growing yet? :newidea:

P.S. I don’t know much, just a little – but I am learning.
B.T.W. Did max get killed?
 
Along with what others have said I would say check out Zechariah 4 for information about the two witnesses

Revelation 11:3 “And I will grant authority to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for twelve hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.” 4 These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands that stand before the Lord of the earth. NASB

Zechariah 4:11 Then I said to him, “What are these two olive trees on the right of the lampstand and on its left?” 12 And I answered the second time and said to him, “**What are the two olive branches **which are beside the two golden pipes, which empty the golden oil from themselves?” 13 So he answered me, saying, “Do you not know what these are?” And I said, “No, my lord.” 14 Then he said, “These are the two anointed ones who are standing by the Lord of the whole earth.” NASB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top