Typology and the sacraments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seamus_Sully
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Seamus_Sully

Guest
I am in need of the Biblical types and the sacraments.

Might some great saint out there give a list of the types in the Old Testament and corresponding sacraments?

Thanks!
 
No great saint…sorry it’s just me. Anyway, I’ll give a quick shot.

Baptism–

Noah and the Ark…this is seen in 1 PETER 3:21
Moses leading the people through the red sea.
Ritual baptismal washings in the OT.

Ezk 36:25-28 OT prefiguring:
I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleannesses, and from all your idols I will cleanse you. A new heart I will give you, and a new spirit I will put within you; and I will remove from your body the heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. I will put my spirit within you, and make you follow my statutes and be careful to observe my ordinances. Then you shall live in the land that I gave to your ancestors; and you shall be my people, and I will be your God.

Compare this to ACTS 2:37-38

Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other apostles, “Brothers, what should we do?” Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Confession–

Genesis:
God asking Adam and Eve what they had done and why they clothed themselves.

God asks Cain where is brother was and he asks Cain what he had done?

Leviticus 5:5 Priestly confession and the priest making atonement for the sinner.

Confirmation–
Presentation in the temple

Eucharist–
The show bread
The manna

Matrimony
Adam and Eve…what God has brought together let no man put asunder.
Jewish betrothol, weddings and marriage feasts.

Holy Orders
The priesthood of Aaron, the Levitical priesthood, the hierarchy of the Sanhedrin which included the laying on of hands.

Sacrament of the sick/dying.
Jews always prayed for those that were ill. I would have to do more research to see just how this played out but I don’t think they would leave out visits from the Levites.
 
Baptism–

Noah and the Ark…this is seen in 1 PETER 3:21
Not sure how this works, Noah built the ark on faith! furthermore it was the ark that saved him not the flood water…

“For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, in order that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit; 19 in which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison, 20 who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water. 21 And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you—not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience — through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who is at the right hand of God, having gone into heaven, after angels and authorities and powers had been subjected to Him,” 1 Pet. 3:18-22, NASB
**
Obedience to be baptized coming from faith!**
 
Heb 11:7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.
 
As usual you fail to see the both/and in favor of the either/or approach.

In authentic Christianity, one is baptized when he comes to faith. In the case of infants, their faith is on behalf of their parents.

👍
 
Thanks!

I am unable to see the disagreement, that is, if there is a disagreement.

Again, thanks!
 
Not sure how this works, Noah built the ark on faith! furthermore it was the ark that saved him not the flood water…

“For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, in order that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit; 19 in which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison, 20 who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water. 21 And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you—not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience — through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who is at the right hand of God, having gone into heaven, after angels and authorities and powers had been subjected to Him,” 1 Pet. 3:18-22, NASB
**
Obedience to be baptized coming from faith!**
Soooo, lemme get this straight…:rolleyes:

When Peter says “baptism now saves you” he is talking about the ark, rather than the water?:hmmm:

For one thing, this violates all rules of grammar, since “baptism now saves you” should modify the closest noun to it in the sentence, which happens to be “the water.”:ehh:

No matter. If this is your so-called “reasoning,” then maybe, instead of being baptized with water, we should be baptized by riding around in a little replica of the Noah’s Ark? :hypno:
 
I am in need of the Biblical types and the sacraments.

Might some great saint out there give a list of the types in the Old Testament and corresponding sacraments?

Thanks!
I recommend Tim Gray’s short book, Sacraments in Scripture; Salvation History Made Present
 
I’m not a saint either, but here is what I suggest:

The most plain imagery of the feeding of the multitudes suggets the analogy of sacraments, for, how does Christ ultimately feed us? With sanctifying grace. And what the primary sources of this grace? The Seven Sacraments.

But also, already there is predestined the two forms of separation in the Body of Christ, schism and heresy, respectively. That is, the schismatic will stand apart from Peter and yet retain the validity of a general Apostolic Successor. Hence, in Schism, because there resides still the sense of the priesthood, therefore the seven sacraments remain.

But, of course, the other form is far worse, that is, the person or community which stands apart not only from Peter, but from the whole general collection of the glorious successors of the Apostles, is the far worse tragedy of HERESY.

But, then we come back to, seeing as all the five sacraments after Baptism and Marriage require the episcopate, the heretic must lose intrinsically these five, and retain, as we have seen, merely two, two that, incidentally, very much form the species to be twisted in such a manner that, after twisting, they become a sign of the foundational lies of all sin, sin appropriately being a “taking” of the Creation from God, in as much as “heresy” is synonymous with “to take.”

But wherein have we seen the numbers five and two? Or seven? A-ha, in the feeding of the multitudes! For behold, in all four Gospels, there is the story of how Christ feeds the 5,000 with 5 loaves and 2 fish, and in two of the four, he feeds 4,000 people with 7 loaves and a few fish.

So then I propose the following: just as schism and heresy are predetermined in any Creation, and since this very ecclesiology must be intimately connected with the sacramental life itself, so then the Scriptures are in fact communicating these two primary forms of separation precisely in the parallel stories.

Hence, in schism, there are 7 loaves, and a few fish, in as much as loaves come from the earth, and the earth is the foundation of truth (see 1 Tim. 3:15), that is, the Church is. Hence, though the Orthodox are separated from the West, nevertheless, they are less prone to error, for they have the general foundation of the earth that is Oral Tradition. For if I approach an Eastern Bishop and say, what think you of this doctrine, he shall listen to argumentation not only from Scripture but also the Tradition, at least that which came in the millennium before the Great Schism.

But behold, the five loaves and two fish then reference heresy, for the heretics reject the fruit that would come from the earth, they separate from that foundation of Oral Tradition, of the Bishops in general, and hence, they are ‘tossed to and fro by every wave of doctrine.’ But behold, even in the chaos of the sea, Christ does not leave them orphans. Rather, he can still feed them with the two fish, Baptism and Marriage, which do not require a priest, for behold, “the baptism of heretics is valid (assuming proper form and matter)”. And even those who do not use proper form might still get the sanctifying power implicitly, provided they are not culpable in the rejection of the form or do not intend to cleanse. Also, the priest does not confer marriage (in the Roman Rite). The man and the woman confer the sacrament upon each other, and the sign thereof is precisely their BODIES!

…continued below…
 
…continued from above…

And finally, consider an interesting detail: remember, there were twelve tribes of Israel, fulfilled by the Twelve Apostles. And in the OT, there was indeed a great schism, between the North and the South, and the North took most, that is, 10, of the 12 tribes, and yet the true ultimate kingship remained in Judah, that is the South, the 2 remnant tribes.

So then, in the NT, similarly, the East broke from the West and took 4 of the 5 Apostolic Sees with it, leaving behind merely Peter, who yet retains the ultimate kingship. Coincidence? Perhaps. But let us continue: so then Christ fed 4 thousand with 7 loaves and a few fish (the primary separation in the** East** has been Schism, with 4 Apostolic Sees) and Christ fed 5 thousand with 5 loaves and 2 fish (the primary division in the West has been Heresy, which, even though it contains only 1 Apostolic See, nevertheless has the fullness of all 5 because it is the Peter, the ultimate foundation, the Rock, that is, even more solid than the general earth.)
 
I could not find this yesterday, but this is helpful.

Any further help?
 
I could not find this yesterday, but this is helpful.

Any further help?
“Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brothers; and the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward.” 1 Sm 16:13
OT typology for…Confirmation?
 
Thanks banjo
de nada….I found another perspective on 1 Sm 16:13 taken from the Navarre Bible commentary. “David is a type of those who in the Christian dispensation are called to offices in the Church: what matters is not background, personal qualities or material resources but the realization that one is called by God.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top