P
Peter_J
Guest
I certainly don’t agree with them, if that’s what you’re wondering!So this was the opinion of those people, right?
I certainly don’t agree with them, if that’s what you’re wondering!So this was the opinion of those people, right?
Did anyone notice the subject of the Icon? It is of Our Lord being baptized by immersion.There are also apparently lots of Baptists in Georgia who carry on with Orthodox-like trappings, including icons, bearded priests and bishops, liturgical dress, etc. Here is one of their “bishops”, Malkhaz Songulashvili:
http://www.pullen.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/international4-169x300.jpg
It has been reported to me by Orthodox Tewahedo friends more than once that back at home in Ethiopia, it is known that Protestants will sometimes dress up in the garb of Orthodox monks to preach publicly about the “errors” of Orthodoxy, thereby giving their criticism an air of authority and knowledge that none of these people actually have. It’s disgusting.
But don’t Greek Catholics and Eastern Orthodox wear the exact same vestments?To win converts I would say. Sadly, it is an old story – even Catholics used to engage in it.![]()
Yes, as far as I know.But don’t Greek Catholics and Eastern Orthodox wear the exact same vestments?
Maybe it’s a lead in to a nice rant against Latin Catholics and others who don’t use immersion.Did anyone notice the subject of the Icon? It is of Our Lord being baptized by immersion.
Kind of right for Baptists.
But Orthodox use immersion as well, just usually babies. They aren’t really making any point there.
As far as nominal…facts are facts. 73.6% of those in Brazil who claim to be Catholic only attend mass on certain holidays, i.e., Christmas, Easter, etc. The source comes for the CIA website. Other sources have it as low as ~64%, with only 20% actually attending mass on a regular basis.Well, it’s a good thing I can copy and paste:
I did not see any qualifiers, i.e., RC (nominal) 73.6%.
Yes, Brazil was the most Catholic nation in the world at one point in time, with 98% of its population identifying as Catholic. You can google it.
Yes, I do recognize the sarcasm. But, it is very ironic. Like you, many Catholics are offended that Protestants state that Catholics believe in salvation by works. Then when I ask what must one do to be saved, I get a list of things “I” must do. There are numerous threads on this site that state just that. If you like I would be more than happy to point you to threads that list out multiple steps that are required to achieve salvation.Don’t you recognise sarcasm when you see it Scitor? That is what the rolling eyes icon meant.
NO ZERO Catholic or Orthodox believes in salvation by works, that is a lie based solely on predjudice. How old are you Scitor?
I could as easily say “it’s easy to be Baptist, all you have to do is 'git saved and do as you will”. But I know better. You see predjudice, and ignorance goes two ways.
Nope…I am still here. As much as I would like to reply immediately to all post, life sometimes dictates otherwise.I suspect that Scitor has left the building. :sad_yes:
Really, andrewstx? Are you really asking how old I am? My guess is I am probably the same age as you give or take 10 years.How old are you Scitor?
Looks like rfournier has left the building. But just in case he/she is still around, I am still waiting for an answer. See bolded below. My guess is I will never get an answer.I do believe I said THE VAST MAJORITY went to countries that were already Christian. I did in no way intend to include ALL.
The work of those who spread the Gospel in ANY country that doesn’t already have it is a very admirable thing. But to go to a Christian country and try to “convert” them sounds like a mission from the the DRD (Department of Redundancy Department).
There’s a high profile missionary, (whose son is a high profile prefessional football player who can’t seem to get a job in the NFL), that has invested YEARS of his life in the Philippines trying to convert the native people. According to a quick web-search of mine; 80% of the people are Catholic, and another 15% are Protestant. Who is he trying to convert? The remaining 5%?
Well, considering that the Chaldean Catholic church is historically from iraq that kind of mutes that point entirely. Iraq was apostolic up until Islam. Pakistan has many catholics and orthodox, afghanistan i am not so sure. Both protestants and catholics have martyrs, and I dont think getting drawn into an arguement over who has more is good, nor beneficial. Besides, being a martyr in an of itself isnt nessessarily a good thing, as many have died for false beliefs as well.Looks like rfournier has left the building. But just in case he/she is still around, I am still waiting for an answer. See bolded below. My guess is I will never get an answer.![]()
Second, as far as Protestant missionaries in hostile countries such as Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc., you are once again very misinformed. We have very high conviction in our faith and more than willing to put our money where our mouth is…ARE YOU! Please tell me, how many Catholic missionaries are in Iraq/Pakistan/Afghanistan. Do you know?
If 73.6% is meant to convey the Catholic population in toto in Brazil, than how can EVERY single Catholic in Brazil be only a nominal Catholic (you realize this would also include bishops, priests, religious and devoted Catholics as being nominal too, right)? And I looked up the CIA factbook, it’s a little bizarre, i.e., Catholics in Brazil are categorically stated as being nominal, yet almost every other country, including Canada, has NO nominal Catholics, really? Moreover, your other source cites that 20% go to church regularly, so according to the CIA would these Catholics be nominal too?As far as nominal…facts are facts. 73.6% of those in Brazil who claim to be Catholic only attend mass on certain holidays, i.e., Christmas, Easter, etc. The source comes for the CIA website. Other sources have it as low as ~64%, with only 20% actually attending mass on a regular basis.
Loaded question, moreover, there are many issues within evangelicalism that you are not broaching:So, yes, there are many self-declared Catholics that may be approached by Protestant missionaries. You may also be surprised how many Catholics actually do the approaching. Given the view of Catholics that salvation is faith + works, would you rather “inactive” Catholics stay inactive and risk eternity separated from God or hear the gospel from a Protestant and potentially grown in relationship with Christ and live eternity in heaven.
When Paulo Romeiro wrote Evangelicals in Crisis in the mid-1990s, a book that has remained a bestseller among Brazilian evangelicals, he addressed just one of the many ways in which evangelicalism had collapsed in Brazil: **its inability to halt the spread of prosperity theology. **It is increasingly clear that evangelicals in Brazil are today in the midst of a much larger crisis, starting with the difficulty—not to mention the impossibility—to define what it means to be evangelical.
According to the latest official census, evangelicals represent almost one-quarter of the total population of Brazil (22.5 percent).** It is a phenomenal growth, seeing that just 40 years ago they were only 2.5 percent.** In spite of their constant official growth, hailed to the world as a success story of missions and evangelism, evangelicals in Brazil face today several challenges. I’ll mention a few:
•uncertainty about their own future theological direction
•multiplicity of divergent theologies
•lack of a leadership with moral and spiritual authority
•doctrinal and moral downfall of once-respectable leaders
•rise of totalitarian leaders who call themselves not only pastors but also self-proclaimed bishops and apostles
•gradual conquest of the schools of theology by theological liberalism
•lack of moral standards that can function as a starting point for ecclesiastical discipline
•depreciation of doctrine and exaltation of experience alone
thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/08/01/the-growing-crisis-behind-brazils-evangelical-success-story/As a result, more Brazilians are looking for churches just to feel good, to seek immediate solutions for their material problems without even reflecting on deeper questions about the existence of eternity, and moving from one community to another without any commitment or engagement in real Christian life and testimony. Incidentally, the number of people who profess to be evangelicals but rarely attend church has grown from 6 percent to 16 percent of all evangelicals in the last few years.
No, 98% was what the Catholic population was some decades ago. Here is a Pew research study that gives stats from 1970 and onwards:As far as the 98%, I did not post the stat…you did. By saying I can google it, it leads me to believe you are unable to provide a source.![]()
On the authority of Michael the Syrian, Patriarch of the Syriac Orthodox Church from 1166 to 1199, who compiled a list of dioceses in Central Asia that were known in his time, we know that the Syriac Orthodox Church once had dioceses in Herat, Khorasan (not to be confused with the modern Iranian province; this historical region was mostly in Afghanistan), and Aprah, as well as other places. In Zaranj (SW Afghanistan, near the border with Iran), the SOC diocese lasted until the 13th century.Pakistan has many catholics and orthodox, afghanistan i am not so sure.
You’ve been given clear answers, and I’ll chip in with:Looks like rfournier has left the building. But just in case he/she is still around, I am still waiting for an answer. See bolded below. My guess is I will never get an answer.![]()
Second, as far as Protestant missionaries in hostile countries such as Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc., you are once again very misinformed. We have very high conviction in our faith and more than willing to put our money where our mouth is…ARE YOU! Please tell me, how many Catholic missionaries are in Iraq/Pakistan/Afghanistan. Do you know?
Yes. If I recall correctly, in addition to the East Syriac presence there, there is also something in Syriac Orthodox writings of the same period (perhaps also in HH Mor Michael’s lists? It’s been a while) about a diocese in “Beth Persaye” (lit. House/Land of the Persians) which was apparently in Eastern Iran, and in Western Iran in Tabriz. Today the only Orthodox that I know of in that country that are not recently established (the Russians have something over there, don’t they? Any EO know about that?) are the country’s sizable Armenian community. From what I’ve read, most Catholics there are expats from various countries, with only a few thousand Chaldeans making up the ‘regional’ representation there. There is a very interesting film out there called “A Cry From Iran” that I have recommended on here several times about the growth of Assemblies of God/Pentecostal house churches (known in Farsi as Jama’at-e-Rabbani) in the modern era, which are somewhat notorious for being composed of many ex-Muslim converts who are often imprisoned, murdered, etc. It is interesting, though, in that the protagonist of the film, the martyred leader of the AOG/J-E-R Haik Hovsepian, was not exactly a “missionary” in the sense that many have been using it in this thread, as he was a native Armenian-Iranian Christian who had at some point had converted to Pentecostalism apparently of his own accord according to his own family. It takes all kinds, I suppose.Iran has also had a large apostolic christian presence.
Yes and no. The issue is not evangelization as such … A better question would have been “Do Catholics evangelize places like Ukraine, trying to get Orthodox to join the Roman Communion?” Catholics did do that (quite a lot actually) in the past, but now our official position is completely against it. To look at it another way, we are very desirous that those who are Eastern Catholic will stay EC, but not that more EOs will become EC.I am confused.
Is this not what Catholics do, too? Evangelize?
Are there not Catholic missionaries who have gone and still go into other countries in hopes of converting people?
.
Truth be told, there’s the difference between the official policy and the way the faithful act, as well.Yes and no. The issue is not evangelization as such … A better question would have been “Do Catholics evangelize places like Ukraine, trying to get Orthodox to join the Roman Communion?” Catholics did do that (quite a lot actually) in the past, but now our official position is completely against it. To look at it another way, we are very desirous that those who are Eastern Catholic will stay EC, but not that more EOs will become EC.