Ukrainian Catholic Patriarch on Pope/RussianPatriarch Meeting : Feels "betrayed" by "halftruths"

  • Thread starter Thread starter SyroMalankara
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SyroMalankara

Guest
Ukrainian Greek Catholics: “betrayed” by “half-truths” in Francis and Kirill’s Joint Declaration

Marta Allevato
15 February 2016
AsiaNews.it/news-en/Ukrainian-Greek-Catholics:-betrayed-by-half-truths-in-Francis-and-Kirill%E2%80%99s-Joint-Declaration–36684.html

The major archbishop of Kiev speaks of Cuba encounter: a meeting of “two parallel worlds”. The Joint Declaration “generally positive” for future cooperation. Points which concern Ukraine “controversial”: the Vatican is being exploited by Russian Orthodox diplomacy. Shevchuk reiterates: the Greek-Catholic Church has never supported the war, provoked by “Russian aggression”.

Moscow (AsiaNews) - The Ukrainian Greek Catholic church feels “betrayed” by the Vatican after the meeting between Pope Francis and the Patriarch of Moscow Kirill, on February 12 in Cuba.

According to the head of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church, the major Archbishop of Kiev, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, it was an encounter of “two parallel worlds.”

“This was especially evident in the comments that followed; the two sides are on two different wavelengths, and have set different goals,” Shevchuk said in an interview published on the news website of the Greek-Catholic Church.

The Moscow Patriarchate also reiterated before the historic meeting that the Greek-Catholic Church is the biggest obstacle to the rapprochement of the Russian-Orthodox and Catholics. “No common prayer, the airport as a neutral and non-ecclesiastical environment. The impression - said Shevchuk - is that there are two parallel worlds; I do not know if these two realities have intersected at all during this meeting, but according to mathematical rules two parallel lines never intersect”.

The Archbishop of Kiev said he admired the Pope’s “humility”, in so far as he “seeks only one thing: to witness to the Gospel of Christ to humanity today.” He then urged people "not to make any rushed judgements, to avoid reading this encounter only at a political level like those who hope to exploit a humble Pope for their human plans”. “If we do not enter into the spiritual reality of the Holy Father and we do not perceive with him the actions of the Holy Spirit, we will remain trapped in the principles of this world and its followers,” he added, warning that in this way “this will become a meeting that took place but never happened”.

The archbishop was much harsher in his judgment of the Joint Declaration. While it is admitting that it is a “generally positive text”, which “raises issues that concern both Catholic and Orthodox, and opens new prospects for cooperation”, he also stressed that the points relating to Ukraine and in particular to the Greek-Catholic Church “create more questions than answers”. The Joint Declaration signed in Cuba suggests that the former Soviet republic is experiencing “civil conflict and not the aggression of a neighboring country”. “For a document that was supposed to be non-theological, but essentially socio-political, it is hard to imagine a theme, weaker than the one drafted in this text,” denounced the Archbishop, referring explicitly to the Head of the Department for External Church Relations of the Russian Patriarchate Orthodox Metropolitan Hilarion and Cardinal Koch, of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian unity. The latter, he noted, “is competent regarding the theological issues in relations with the various Churches and Christian communities, but is not an expert in international political issues, especially in sensitive issues such as the Russian aggression in Ukraine.” “This has been exploited by the Department for external relations which is, first of all, the diplomatic tool of the Moscow Patriarchate,” denounced Shevchuk, who then pointed out that while he is a member of the Pontifical Council for the Unity of Christians, appointed by Pope Benedict, “no one asked me to express my thoughts and, as has happened in the past, talk about us without us, without giving us a voice”.

At the same time, paragraph 25 of the Joint Declaration speaks with respect of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic church recognized as a subject of relations between the Catholic Church and Orthodox. “It seems that most have no objection to our right to exist,” said the Archbishop of Kiev. “In fact in order to exist and act we are not obliged to ask anyone’s permission,” he added. “In the past we have been accused of expansion in the canonical territory of the Moscow Patriarchate - he said - and now our rights to take care of our people wherever they need is recognized. I assume that this applies also to the Russian Federation, where today we have the opportunity to freely and legally exist, or on the territory of the annexed Crimea, where we have been ‘re-registered’ according to Russian legislation but in reality almost totally liquidated”.
 
Shevchuk is most critical of the point where the joint declaration invites, “our Churches in Ukraine to work to achieve social harmony, to abstain from taking part in the conflict and not to support further development of the conflict”. “Point 26 is the most controversial,” he states. “One gets the impression that the Patriarchate of Moscow refuses to recognize that it is part of the conflict, which openly supports the aggression of Russia against Ukraine and blesses the military actions of Russia in Syria as a ‘holy war’”, he denounces. “The very expression ‘conflict’ here is dark and seems to suggest to the reader that there is a ‘civil war’, rather than an aggression by a neighboring state.” “The Churches and religious organizations in Ukraine have never supported the war and have worked constantly for peace and social harmony,” he added, raising: "Undoubtedly this has aroused deep disappointment among many of the faithful of our Church and between conscientious citizens of Ukraine ". “I have been contacted by many who tell me that they felt betrayed by the Vatican, let down by half-truths of the text and the indirect support of the Holy See for the aggression against Ukraine,” he said. “Anyway, I encourage our faithful not to dramatize this statement and not exaggerate its importance in the life of the Church - concludes the Archbishop - We have lived through several statements and will survive even this”. “The union and communion with the Holy Father, the Successor of Peter, is not the result of a political agreement or a diplomatic compromise, but it is a matter of our faith.”
 
I agree with the Catholic Herald.

Pope Francis has greatly disappointed me over this issue. 😦

The Joint Document appears to tacitly approve the Russian occupation of Ukraine and the oppression directed towards the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church by the Moscow Patriarchate.

I apologize for saying this but history will not judge the Vatican kindly. It has made a colossal diplomatic miscalculation.

Future historians will have a field day, it might even be worse than the “Hitler’s Pope” allegations since this time around there is actual evidence of complicity with an expansionist regime threatening the territorial sovereignty of its neighbours, without so much as a whiff of condemnation by the Church in defence of the victimized Catholics of Ukraine… 😦

How will this make Catholics in Lithuania and Poland feel?

Consider the Lithuanian archbishop’s view of Putin:

catholicherald.co.uk/news/2014/12/16/lithuanian-archbishop-fears-russian-will-attack-baltic-states/

**Lithuanian archbishop fears Russia attack on Baltic states
**

I thought that Pope Francis was intending to bring more transparency and decentralization to Church, so why were Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk and Archbishop Gintaras Grusas not consulted over their apprehensions?
 
The Archbishop of Kiev said he admired the Pope’s “humility”, in so far as he “seeks only one thing: to witness to the Gospel of Christ to humanity today.” He then urged people "not to make any rushed judgements, to avoid reading this encounter only at a political level like those who hope to exploit a humble Pope for their human plans”. “If we do not enter into the spiritual reality of the Holy Father and we do not perceive with him the actions of the Holy Spirit, we will remain trapped in the principles of this world and its followers,” he added, warning that in this way “this will become a meeting that took place but never happened”.
I don’t claim any side is perfect, of course, but I would like to praise His Beatitude for not engaging in the kind of shrill criticism of the Pope that I have heard (too) often in certain traditionalist Catholic circles.
 
Pope Francis has greatly disappointed me over this issue.



I thought that Pope Francis was intending to bring more transparency and decentralization to Church, so why were Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk and Archbishop Gintaras Grusas not consulted over their apprehensions?
Alright, but why do you believe that they haven’t been consulted?
 
Alright, but why do you believe that they haven’t been consulted?
Because His Beatitude Archbishop Shevchuk said so himself in that same interview:
I would note that, as the Head of our Church, I am an official member of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, nominated already by Pope Benedict. However, no one invited me to express my thoughts and so, essentially, as had already happened previously, they spoke about us without us, without giving us a voice.
.

By the way, I am no traditionalist. Ecclesiastically, I am with His Holiness Pope Francis 100% on where he is leading Holy Mother Church. Yet I am genuinely upset by his foreign policy in this respect. And yes, while the Holy Father may only be thinking spiritually, his actions here have diplomatic ramifications for Russian revachism in Eastern Europe. As a European, I’m aghast at the terrible timing of this meeting.
 
I think, though, that I interpret this
However, no one invited me to express my thoughts
a little bit differently than you do. I’m sure the Vatican has consulted him, well, however many times in the last three years. (And however many times during the reigns of the other recent Popes.) I think what he is saying is that he hasn’t been consulted *since *the Vatican discovered that it would be possible to have this meeting with the MP.
 
By the way, I am no traditionalist.
Me neither … well, I did have a phase; but even then I didn’t exactly fit the mold of what people think of as traditionalist Catholics. Ultimately I decided that calling myself “traditionalist” was confusing people more than anything else. :cool:
 
I think, though, that I interpret this

a little bit differently than you do. I’m sure the Vatican has consulted him, well, however many times in the last three years. (And however many times during the reigns of the other recent Popes.) I think what he is saying is that he hasn’t been consulted *since *the Vatican discovered that it would be possible to have this meeting with the MP.
Perhaps, but the point still remains that the Holy Father and the Patriarch are deliberating on a matter that is very sensitive for the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church without the direct involvement of the UGCC. That cannot be right, surely, regardless of the timeframe.
 
Ukrainian Greek Catholics: “betrayed” by “half-truths” in Francis and Kirill’s Joint Declaration.
Pope Francis has declared that he and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill are brothers and yet, sadly, it appears from these statements that there are some in the Greek Catholic community who apparently refuse to accept that. The time has come for the Greek Catholics of Ukraine to join with the Holy Father and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch and work together to promote democracy, peace and good will toward the Russian minority in Ukraine.
 
Pope Francis has declared that he and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill are brothers
👍
and yet, sadly, it appears from these statements that there are some in the Greek Catholic community who apparently refuse to accept that. The time has come for the Greek Catholics of Ukraine to join with the Holy Father and the Russian Orthodox Patriarch and work together to promote democracy, peace and good will toward the Russian minority in Ukraine.
I’m sure it isn’t easy to live in Ukraine, whether one is Catholic *or *Orthodox. Hopefully the Orthodox will be sympathetic toward the “many who … felt betrayed” that His Beatitude mentioned. And, likewise, I hope that we Catholics can be sympathetic toward those who are equally touchy but in the opposite direction.
 
As far as the lack of “direct involvement of the UGCC”, I would say no question, His Holiness had every right to invite His Beatitude, if he had chosen to do so.

My fear, though, is that commentators are going to spin it to sound like the Pope was **wrong **to go to the meeting alone, as if he needed a chaperone.
 
As far as the lack of “direct involvement of the UGCC”, I would say no question, His Holiness had every right to invite His Beatitude, if he had chosen to do so.

My fear, though, is that commentators are going to spin it to sound like the Pope was **wrong **to go to the meeting alone, as if he needed a chaperone.
I don’t think that anyone is suggestung the Pope needed a chaperone, only that the Vatican could have given the UGCC an opportunity to take part in the consultation phase for the Joint Statement, instead of apparently going over the head of His Beatitude Shevchuk and seemingly conceding significant ground to the Moscow Patriarchate that may have ramifications for the UGCC, without the UGCC having had any say in the deliberations.

There would appear to be a lack of communication somewhere here.
 
I think the Pope approached this situation much the same way he agreed to meet the Lutherans for the 500 year anniversary of the Reformation.

He is looking at the big picture, trying to find common ground between different Christian faiths. (Though I do get tired of the ‘moving towards unity’ talk.) Of course I sympathize with localized conflicts in Ukraine, etc., the plight of the Eastern Catholics, etc. but I don’t think we should view this effort by the Vatican as dismissive of these concerns. Just because the Pope is talking to the LWF doesn’t mean he supports women priests.

Let’s not let perfection get in the way of good.
 
Give it time. Give it time.

That’s what I’m saying (if you stop right there, which I realize you won’t ;)).
I will take your word for it. 🙂 I have my doubts about the prudence of this document, however. I am encouraged and heartened by ecumenism but not at the expense of others, least of all other Catholics. The Moscow Patriarchate is so closely bound to the present Russian government that one has sufficient reason to have some grave doubts.
 
I am encouraged and heartened by ecumenism but not at the expense of others, least of all other Catholics.
Oh absolutely. This was one of the concerns of the authors too:
It is today clear that the past method of “uniatism”, understood as the union of one community to the other, separating it from its Church, is not the way to re–establish unity.
(echoing the 1993 document, “Uniatism, method of union of the past, and the present search for full communion”).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top