R
Ridgerunner
Guest
I congratulate you for having a university that’s different. But your experience is not reflective of most.It strikes me as interesting – and a bit unnerving – to hear the old and tired trope that American education fails to discuss central historical topics because it’s weak and/or run by those who favor socialism/communism/totalitarianism (all three seem to be one in the same in some posts here). I don’t know any professors (or college administrators, for that matter) who don’t “want to report it or teach about it to this very day lest people realize just how vicious and totalitarian leftism has been historically, and how base are the motivations of so many of its leaders.”At my institution, there are at least thirty faculty members who regularly teach about the Holocaust, the Holodomor, Armenia, Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, and on and on (plus at least twenty more who engage with these topics every 1-3 years in rotation with other human rights abuses). Our efforts have been institutionalized and given primacy in the college’s strategic plans. And we’re not alone – I can think of at least thirty other post-secondary institutions in the U.S. which have a formal endowment and/or program for this kind of work, and *dozens *more that engage with these topics in various courses and co-curricular programming. I can’t say that we’re the majority, but if we exist, best not to paint with too broad a brush by claiming that those lefty educators won’t ever confront totalitarianism.
I’d like to interject that we know far more about the atrocities of the USSR post-its collapse. There were certainly public attempts prior to this period to draw attention to the Holodomor, which were roundly quashed. But the extent of western knowledge is certainly impacted by increased access to this region.
Some other recommended reading, if anyone’s interested:
Execution by Hunger, by Miron Dolot
Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, by Timothy Snyder
It may be noted in passing that both “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” and the “Gulag” series were all published BEFORE the Soviet Union collapsed. Possibly, due to Solhenitsyn’s stature in the literary world (Nobel Prize) and his experiential credentials, his works had a great deal to do with that collapse and with the disenchantment with leftism generally.