A
Aramis
Guest
The Ruthenian was/is, as well.
Interesting. Were all the unions “covenants of communion”?
I know that the Union of Brest (1596) was a “covenant of communion”. I wonder about the Union of Uzhhorod (1646)…was that a “covenant of communion too”?
The Melkites’ union is, too.
Each came in to the union by treaty, with specific restrictions on the filioque: have to accept the HS’s transmission via the Son, but need not confess it during the creed. Each called to retain their faith.