D
DarkLight
Guest
I think my objections are rooted more in psychology and epistemology. I think the “free will” arguments get rather shaky when compared against the existence of traumatic disorders. I would wonder how to do them without essentially succumbing to the temptation to place moral blame on people who develop trauma symptoms. I am a bit wary of writings on things like despair for this reason. It’s not been that long in history where PTSD was seen as evidence of cowardice.In the example I am thinking of is prisoners of war. They are certainly being deprived of the use of their free will, but some choose to survive and not give in to despair and give up, but remain hopeful. They may withdraw into that part of themselves - in their thoughts, in which to cope. I’m also thinking of a man (can’t remember who, sorry), who was imprisoned and tortured, but he survived because he said whilst they could imprison the body, the mind was free to go where he willed.
The other concern is epistemic. Especially in the case of a child, a person’s options are effectively limited by the information they have. Someone who has not at any point had a proper grounding in faith and morals and the ability to develop those appropriately will not have the ability to accept and hope and pray. How can they, unless they are somehow from the outside given the knowledge to do so? It’s common, for example, with children, for a prayer to look more like “God help me stop being so bad” because for all the child knows they are just hopelessly bad.