Unbaptized Christians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlwaysCurious
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Evidentlty I will have to work on my delivery.🙂
Nothing wrong with your delivery you are just debating with what Jim Rome calls the “likes to fight” bunch. The players on a sports team who are always ready to drop the gloves in hockey terms.
 
I’d rather be on the “Like to Make Sure We’re All on the Same Page About What We’re Actually Talking About” team. It might not fit on our jerseys, but we’re a determined squad just the same…
 
=AlwaysCurious;7908310]My family is composed largely of Quakers, who see the sacraments as mere disposable symbols. As such, most of them have never been baptized. However, they also consider themselves staunch Christians, and in most other respects would identify with typical evangelical Protestant theology and practice. They believe in a conversion experience, a personal relationship with God, moral living, (their own interpretation of) the Bible, and so forth. Some are involved in formal ministry and missions work, and seem to be every bit as faithful and fruitful as many baptized Christians.
So my question: how does this fit into the Catholic, sacramental understanding of baptism as the beginning of Christian life? Does it fall under baptism by desire (if only they knew what baptism was, they’d go through with it)? Can a person be a Christian and yet purposefully unbaptized as a result of sheer ignorance?
And finally: does it fall to me, the lone Catholic of the bunch, to direct them toward a better understanding of the sacraments so that they will at least get baptized? Thanks for any advice!
Replying to your last question first. Ina perfect world; absolutely:) But we don’t live in a perfect world. Faith is and MUST come from God Himself.

You should live your [our] fait fully and publically; teach and answer questions when they arrive. And pray that is God time and God’s WAY; you’ll be guided by the HS to do what God would have you do His Will.

If memory serves from my time in YORK Pa., Quakers do not avail themselves of modern means of communication; which GREATLY limits their access to the TRUTH. I could envision them not knowing because they have NOT had an opportunity to know Christ and HIS Church /Faith. Thus BOD is a possibility.

However IF they have a REAL Bible; they are likely at risk. Sacraments Like Baptism from John 3:5; Penance from John 20:19-23; Eucharist from FIVE different NT Authors and Christ Himself; notably in John chapter six; Confirmation from the Pentocost account of John 20, and the last Rites from James 5:14 are clear enougn to at least raise reasonable questions. THIS IS A HIGH RISK factor.

BUT it’s God’s judgment call. Holy He can determine and judge motive and compare it to REAL Opportunity for the truth.

Keep praying for them and be ready if and when an opportunity presents itself.

God Bless you and them!
Pat
 
Finally…the truth. You are on a Catholic forum denying one of the main staples of their faith. You are given multitudes of Scriptural and patristic discourse which supports the apostolic understanding of holy Sacraments (Mysteries) and yet you insist on calling them “outward rituals.”
This is evident. I think the OP knows what the Quakers believe.

Yes. And your posts are condescending. 😦
As a Friend, it is MY responsibility to insure that I speak the Truth at all times…it is also my responsibility that I preserve the dignity of those with whom I am speaking to.

One of our Queries asks “Do you speak the Truth in love, do you seek to embody peace…do you seek to preserve the dignity of those with whom you speak?”

If the members who have responded here take umbrage at my “delivery”, then it is my responsibility…not theirs to seek to find a way to express myself in a way consistent with Truth yet not offend them…being a peacemaker as we are called to be has difficult tasks attached to it…and to live the testimonies of Friends is not always easily done especially in a diverse religious forum…even a “non-catholic religious” forum such as this.

Peace to you friend.
 
Publisher, I was born and raised Quaker and remained one for 27 years, so I understand completely where you’re coming from. However, based on some of your posts in other threads, I can safely say the meeting in which I was raised would differ with your theology quite a bit in some regards. (As you probably know, this is not uncommon in Quakerism. My cousin, who has been an administrator in my state’s yearly meeting for several years, went to a worldwide gathering of Quakers and came back saying they probably couldn’t have agreed on a single doctrinal statement. That’s one reason I’m now a Catholic.)

Anyway, I say this because my family is firmly committed to their identity as Christians, above and beyond their Quakerism. They hold to the Trinity, for instance, as a matter of fact. That we so readily (and radically) dismissed or redefined other integral aspects of the traditional Christian faith strikes me as an inconsistency.
Friend no doubt…you were a member I assume of a programmed meeting with a paid pastor? They probably are part of Evangelical Friends International.

The single doctrine I beleive most Friends would accept is that “there is that of God” in each of us…and it is the task of Friends to learn to “speak to that of God” in others without causing difficulty…which I obviously have done by not being sensitive enough to my Catholic and Orthodox brethren…the great diversity in belief and the call to live at peace with one another…is what has kept me a Friend for over 37 years.

I wish you well on your Journey friend…peace to you.
 
Replying to your last question first. Ina perfect world; absolutely:) But we don’t live in a perfect world. Faith is and MUST come from God Himself.

You should live your [our] fait fully and publically; teach and answer questions when they arrive. And pray that is God time and God’s WAY; you’ll be guided by the HS to do what God would have you do His Will.

If memory serves from my time in YORK Pa., Quakers do not avail themselves of modern means of communication; which GREATLY limits their access to the TRUTH. I could envision them not knowing because they have NOT had an opportunity to know Christ and HIS Church /Faith. Thus BOD is a possibility.

However IF they have a REAL Bible; they are likely at risk. Sacraments Like Baptism from John 3:5; Penance from John 20:19-23; Eucharist from FIVE different NT Authors and Christ Himself; notably in John chapter six; Confirmation from the Pentocost account of John 20, and the last Rites from James 5:14 are clear enougn to at least raise reasonable questions. THIS IS A HIGH RISK factor.

BUT it’s God’s judgment call. Holy He can determine and judge motive and compare it to REAL Opportunity for the truth.

Keep praying for them and be ready if and when an opportunity presents itself.

God Bless you and them!
Pat
Friend, you may have us confused with the Amish…unless the specific Friend is a “Luddite” of some sort…Friends do not withdraw from information on the web…I avial myself to as much “technology” as I am comfortable with…but most of us of my particular tradition seek to live simply…and if “simply” means living without computer…some of us do…but it is a personal choice among us…not an official dictate of the Meeting.
 
Nothing wrong with your delivery you are just debating with what Jim Rome calls the “likes to fight” bunch. The players on a sports team who are always ready to drop the gloves in hockey terms.
Thank you friend…but as I wrote above…IT IS MY responsibility to preserve tender consciences and seek to speak the Truth in love and not offend by doing so…a difficult task to be sure…but thank you for your words just the same.
 
As a Friend, it is MY responsibility to insure that I speak the Truth at all times…
Excellent. Then I would suggest that you do not denigrate the apostolic faith–whether you think it is merely your “delivery”—or “preserving tender consciences”—or whatever.
 
Honestly, you know my problem with this. You are welcome to believe whatever it is you chose, be it VooDoo.

Hey, its your Soul, your Free-Will and your eternity.

My problem is when your thinking sways others, who may be nothing more than followers. Involved in peer pressure, or just have that large need to be accepted like so many humans have. These are where I see the biggest numbers lead astray. Well look at Jim Jones? Not the best example. But nonetheless. Give someone the ability to speak and look out.

Here is where I see the tragedy. No different than Christ said on scripture. “Woe to those who cause my followers to Sin”.

See, me if I do wrong I’m gonna do wrong alone, I don’t want any responsibility for you doing wrong or your Soul. 😉

I may not be the best example as a sinner, but I will surely give you the best advice. 😃

God Bless, Gary
 
Hello All,
I almost didn’t want to wade into this discussion. But, I felt it was important to do so to help clear something up. One or two here gave me the impression that they were offended by Publisher’s use of the term Ritual.
Code:
 I think it should be noted that word isn't derogatory and is in fact quite accurate.  So accurate that the Catholic Church uses it to describe itself as compromised of 23 suri iuris or Ritual Churches 1 Western (Latin)the Largest and 22 distinct Eastern Churches.  Note this is a fact.  It isn't derogatory just informative.

 Please don't be offended by the term Ritual.  After all every religious group has them whether they are Catholic, Reformation, or any of the countless other groups out there we all cling to rituals to help define ourselves and how we all practice our respective faiths.

 The danger lies in if one puts so much emphasis on ritual and nothing on the one whom the ritual is meant to appeal too or glorify ie God.  That's why Jesus called the Pharasees White washed tombs.  There was nothing within them but ritual.  

 Friends  from what I learned from Publisher I believe, don't dwell as much on ritual as say the Catholic or  Reformation churches, yet their meeting in a certain place at a prescribed time is in essence a ritual even if all they do is sit in silence or have a verbal discussion or hymn along.
Peace be with you
 
As one of the ones slightly offended, it wasn’t the word “ritual” that did it. It was more the phraseology and context. The quote I referred to was the following: If you believe you are required to perform these rituals to find favor with God…Friends have no problem with that…for us…We have experienced that spiritual baptism…experientially we have received this New Life in Christ without the outward perfromance of ritual requirements.

when I read it, it was akin to saying: Look, we have a spiritual connection and relationship with God, but if you believe you have to do these rituals to make him favor you, then go ahead. We’ll take the spiritual, you can have the physical

Again, I don’t believe Publisher intended it to be read this way, and maybe I read to much into it…but I just felt he should know that his wording could be read that way, and it could cause friction in a discussion.

Seeing later posts from him, I am relatively convinced that his heart was/is in the right place.
 
As one of the ones slightly offended, it wasn’t the word “ritual” that did it. It was more the phraseology and context. The quote I referred to was the following: If you believe you are required to perform these rituals to find favor with God…Friends have no problem with that…for us…We have experienced that spiritual baptism…experientially we have received this New Life in Christ without the outward perfromance of ritual requirements.

when I read it, it was akin to saying: Look, we have a spiritual connection and relationship with God, but if you believe you have to do these rituals to make him favor you, then go ahead. We’ll take the spiritual, you can have the physical

Again, I don’t believe Publisher intended it to be read this way, and maybe I read to much into it…but I just felt he should know that his wording could be read that way, and it could cause friction in a discussion.

Seeing later posts from him, I am relatively convinced that his heart was/is in the right place.
Whew! “relatively convinced” is better than “not convinced”…I’ll take it!🙂
 
I’ll give ya a straight up “convinced”. But I’m watchin’ you, mister. 😉
 
I had a miscarrage with my second child. Very early on in my pregnancy. Due to the emergency medical situation, there wasn’t time for a baptism. I asked my Priest about this. He told me it wasn’t necessary. My child went right back to God.
 
I think it should be noted that word isn’t derogatory and is in fact quite accurate.
According to the CCC of the Catholic Church—the Sacraments are:

1116 Sacraments are “powers that comes forth” from the Body of Christ,33 which is ever-living and life-giving. They are actions of the Holy Spirit at work in his Body, the Church. They are “the masterworks of God” in the new and everlasting covenant.

Publisher sets forth another definition and people should not be confused by his interpretations.

Furthermore, he says that he believes that the Sacraments are not instituted by Jesus Christ.

The CCC says:

1114 “Adhering to the teaching of the Holy Scriptures, to the apostolic traditions, and to the consensus . . . of the Fathers,” we profess that "the sacraments of the new law were . . . all instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord."31

You are welcome to give him a free pass if you like–but I feel he is misleading–perhaps intentionally…perhaps not.
 
I had a miscarrage with my second child. Very early on in my pregnancy. Due to the emergency medical situation, there wasn’t time for a baptism. I asked my Priest about this. He told me it wasn’t necessary. My child went right back to God.
God’s mercy is boundless! 🙂
 
Friends don’t view them as “disposable symbols”…we don’t accept any “outward” ritual performed for us…or on our behalf as necessary for our salvation…we are baptized…Christ Himself is our Baptizer…in His Spirit…“I baptize you with water…BUT there is one among you who will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.”

As a Friend I have a very sacramental view of my world…life is sacramental…the “sacred” and the “secular” are not separated…each act of mercy and love…each cup of water given in His name carries with it “sacramental meaning”…each meal is an opportunity to share in the Light.

Your Quaker relatives are Baptized…just not with water.🙂
The notion that all aspects of life are sacramental, the intermingling of the sacred and the secular, such as at mealtime, is a very Hasidic Jewish concept. Interesting connection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top