S
STT
Guest
Well, let’s summarize things which we discussed so far.You did it again.
First, I didn’t say that people do not have free will. I said something which its very existence depends on something else does not have free will since his existence depends on something else.You have the burden of proof. You introduced the claim that people don’t have free will and that God is pantheism. We are still waiting for you to prove these things. So far, all your attempts at proofs have failed to hold.
Second, I already argue that a pair of thing can sustain each other, A and B for example. They are not necessary beings but possible beings.
Third, let’s discuss the first comment from another point of view. Let’s accept that God sustain things/beings. Beings have free will so knowledge of their decision is needed. God has the knowledge of our decision eternally. So far so good. The problem arises when someone become aware what is going to decide through revelation. He can of course do opposite otherwise he is not free. This means that God knows that the person does two things opposite of each other which is problematic.
Finally, I think the question that I raised is part of your system of belief so you could prove them.
Last edited: