Maybe not. If the reduction of some services led to businesses having to pay higher wages in order to acquire good employeesBut I can see how the billionaires would be better off if we cut government services.
Maybe not. If the reduction of some services led to businesses having to pay higher wages in order to acquire good employeesBut I can see how the billionaires would be better off if we cut government services.
The key is to offer an alternative. State and local government, the Church and charities. We must find a way to overcome the false narrative that the central government can and should provide the needs of individuals. It effectively can’t and morally shouldn’t.You can’t reason with statists. They will do whatever it takes to get your money. They know how to spend it better than you do.
Then you would have no problem if a future Congress exempted everyone from, say, the first $100,000 in income earned? No withholding fed tax, no 1040 form to file, no Turbo Tax. I mean as long as we don’t care about the massive interest payments ($266 billion annually) that we are already on the hook for, what’s another few trillion in debt?Either way, people getting to keep what is theirs is not a sacrifice on anyone else’s part.
Except that government had to fulfill its obligations.Either way, people getting to keep what is theirs is not a sacrifice on anyone else’s part.
Then you would have no problem if a future Congress exempted everyone from, say, the first $100,000 in income earned? No withholding fed tax, no 1040 form to file, no Turbo Tax. I mean as long as we don’t care about the massive interest payments ($266 billion annually) that we are already on the hook for, what’s another few trillion in debt?
That’s what I’d campaign on.
I don’t think the government should be selling off land that it doesn’t legally own. It should go back to the states or the people from whom it was confiscated. The Constitution is very clear on what land the government can own.One way is to sell off assets it doesn’t need- land, mineral rights,etc.
Well, I certainly don’t want California to get it back if they try to secedeI don’t think the government should be selling off land that it doesn’t legally own. It should go back to the states or the people from whom it was confiscated. The Constitution is very clear on what land the government can own.
California should get back what is rightfully theirs.Well, I certainly don’t want California to get it back if they try to secede
I’d be happy with the progressive tax of the Eisenhower years.The current one.
It might increase collections or it might not. The problem is that few people are willing to do the hard work necessary to determine the true behavioral effects of tax law changes.We COULD INCREASE the corporate income tax rate.
Would that INCREASE the amount of corporate tax collected?
OR would that increase the number of American corporations encouraged to move to Ireland or other low tax countries?
[How many foreign countries are there that have LOWER corporate income tax rates than the United States?]
If you don’t cut the big programs, defense, SS and medicare, you cannot balance the budget. It proves those who claim to be worried about their grandchildren’s welfare to be totally disingenuous. They want smaller debt for their grandchildren as long as they don’t have to sacrifice their pet programs.Biggest spending items curently:
SS benefits $948 billion
Military $773 billion
Medicare $592 billion
Medicaid $385 billion
Interest on debt $266 billion (none charged to SS, btw)
As Trump promised not to cut SS, Medicare, and Medicaid, what do you cut?
Seeing the projections on the interest side to almost $600 billion by 2022 and $800 billion by 2026, does any one else not think a default on the interest is not on the horizon? Just asking…
Yet they (foreigners and others) are still buying Treasuries. Go figure.
Liar Liar Pants on Fire…That belongs to Roy Molester.Five acres in Alabama. It has a buried treasure worth at least $10 million. I’m letting it go for $2 million.