Understanding a condemnation in the Syllabus of Errors

[CrossofChrist]

Any truth pertaining to divine revelation, yes.

I’m not sure, but possibly. The Christian faith isn’t rational in the sense that we can prove on step-by-step reasoning that it is correct, like St. Thomas and the Scholastics do to prove various things, such as God’s existence. It can be a conclusion of reason in that it makes a convincing case for why it is true (otherwise why would anyone believe in Christ?), ** but not because it doesn’t make any sense for it not to be true**.

I retract this post, particularly the bold.

 

[Birdmanman]

I retract this post, particularly the bold.

Haha after 2 years I have to ask, why?

[My views on this matter have grown a lot in the past 2 years and I do not see them as conflicting with the Syllabus of Errors.]