Universal health insurance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Homerun40968
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because some people cannot afford it and appenicitis is a life threatening disorder.
But of course it is better for them die than to make it from people.
Vern’s statement was that people should have to pay what they can afford-

your statement was that people cannot afford it…

are you saying that people cannot afford what they can afford??

Wow, I never thought about it that way…I think I am beginning to understand the mindset of the able-bodied welfare recipient.
 
So then if they can’t pay later on should we go back and undo it and let them die. Let’s get off the money kick for a change and just treat people to prevent them from dying. If they are unable to pay so what?
well, like you said before, if they can’t pay then the whole system falls apart. At least, that was your rationale for why the government needs to pay.

You’re going in circles.
 
Then who will pay for all these stupid wars we keep getting ourselves into.
In a voluntary society, if you want to pay for a war, you are free to do so.

You are also free to NOT pay for a war, if you choose not to.
 
But that’s not the choice we’re offered.

The choice is between the government seriously reducing everyones income and letting a certain number of people die through lack of treatment, or leaving us enough to help people who need it.
Exactly-

Why can’t people get past the idea that government health care is the ONLY response to the needs of the sick.

The government is not the answer to any problems, the government IS the problem.

Where is Ronald Reagan when you need him?
 
well, like you said before, if they can’t pay then the whole system falls apart. At least, that was your rationale for why the government needs to pay.

You’re going in circles.
And you just repeat the same old rhetoric over and over again. Well guess what-it doesn’t work? It is apparent to me that the systme is going to collpase no matter what direction we go in. And if we continue in yours the rich will get richer and the disabled will be left behind to be poorer and poorer. Oh that’s right, that’s because they don’t work hard enough.:rolleyes: Another false accusation.
 
Which is what it really comes down to. Government funding for healthcare reduces *my income. *If it were a choice between the government marginally reducing everyones income or letting a certain number of people die through lack of treatment, you would prefer the later.
No, it comes down to an understanding of the difference between basic human rights, basic human responsibilities, and how government programs like socialized medicine are a violation of both.

If you want to make it a petty argument about money, then go ahead, but you’re avoiding the real issues at hand.

When you get robbed, it isn’t about the money you lost-it is about the violation of your rights.
 
And you just repeat the same old rhetoric over and over again. Well guess what-it doesn’t work? It is apparent to me that the systme is going to collpase no matter what direction we go in. And if we continue in yours the rich will get richer and the disabled will be left behind to be poorer and poorer. Oh that’s right, that’s because they don’t work hard enough.:rolleyes: Another false accusation.
I never said they don’t work hard enough. I said they were sick, and poor, and deserving of our concern and charity.

All I have ever said is the government is not the solution. You seem to keep missing that point.
 
But that’s not the choice we’re offered.

The choice is between the government seriously reducing everyones income and letting a certain number of people die through lack of treatment, or leaving us enough to help people who need it.
Then why can’t this charity everyone here talks about begin by the hospitals writing off the debts of those who can’t afford them? I see everyone talking about charity but I haven’t seen the socalled charitable solutions. Always the same old “work harder”. Well I work hard and for you to say I don’t is a bold faced lie.
 
I never said they don’t work hard enough. I said they were sick, and poor, and deserving of our concern and charity.

All I have ever said is the government is not the solution. You seem to keep missing that point.
Sorry Vern keeps making those ridiculous accusations. Apparently everyone has to meet his standards or they don’t work hard.
 
Well if they have the right to tax I have a say in how my taxes are spent and I have the right to vote in favor of them being spent on health insurance.
So, you want the freedom to choose to spend your tax dollars on health insurance?

Can everyone else exercise that right too? After all, if you and I both agree that we should be free to spend our income as we see fit, then maybe there are other people out there just like us!

If there are enough people like us, who want to help people directly, without involving the government, then maybe we don’t need the government to be involved at all?
 
Then why can’t this charity everyone here talks about begin by the hospitals writing off the debts of those who can’t afford them? I see everyone talking about charity but I haven’t seen the socalled charitable solutions. Always the same old “work harder”. Well I work hard and for you to say I don’t is a bold faced lie.
People don’t think that healthcare is a charity in need of their support precisely because they believe the government either is or should be managing it.
 
People don’t think that healthcare is a charity in need of their support precisely because they believe the government either is or should be managing it.
Even if the government didn’t manage it I seriously doubt whether a hospital would write off someone’s bill. They would send it to a collections agency until it gets paid.
 
Even if the government didn’t manage it I seriously doubt whether a hospital would write off someone’s bill. They would send it to a collections agency until it gets paid.
yes, that is probably true of some hospitals.
In fact, it is true of some hospitals in my area. But you know what? I took the time to find out which hospitals in my area were like that, and I don’t go to them, or to their doctors because I don’t want to deal with businesses that treat their customers that way. Instead, I choose to go to healthcare institutions that engage in fundraising and sliding scale pricing which helps to offset the bills some people can’t pay- and any time I see a little comment card in that hospital, I write that down.

Therefore, at least in regard to my business, that hospital is losing money because of a bad business practice.

That is the beauty of the free market and competition.

If enough consumers take the time to be responsible consumers, then businesses have to take notice. People will not become MORE responsible consumers if the government gets involved-
in fact, under your system, I would not have the freedom to choose one hospital over the other like that, because they would all operate the same way.
 
Even if the government didn’t manage it I seriously doubt whether a hospital would write off someone’s bill. They would send it to a collections agency until it gets paid.
And hospitals write off bills and portions of bills RIGHT NOW-it happens all the time

Hospitals know that they lose money when sending bills to collections-they typically collect 15-30 cents on the dollar. If they settle with a person for 30-50 cents on the dollar, they are still making more than if they send it to collections.
 
But that’s not the choice we’re offered.

The choice is between the government seriously reducing everyones income and letting a certain number of people die through lack of treatment,.
There are people here who would hate it if the government took as little as $15 out of their weekly pay cheque earmarked for health spending. Even if it was simply subsidising private treatement - not ‘socialized’ healthcare - they would still resent it, because the outcome does not matter, only that what’s mine remains mine - and I’ll give on my terms.
or leaving us enough to help people who need it.
That help will depend on whether people feel like consistently donating part of their incomes away. It has to be consistent and it has to be enough to make sure everyone who cannot pay gets treatment. Dread to think what would happen in a recession.
 
Then on that basis big corporations have no rights either but they buy their way into them because the dollar is worshipped over everything else. And the government has no right to tax my wages but they seem to get away with that.
And people can take visits to the ER on the hospital’s bill for the common cold. And doctors can choose not to see Medicaid patients because the government pays significantly less. They don’t have a fundamental right to do any of these things, they are just a product of how society works. We permit big businesses to thrive, not because they have a right to, but because they are the heart of the economy and can sell products more cheaply and efficiently.

Healthcare is not a right either. It is, however, a very useful tool in improving quality of life in society, and thus it is imperative that the U.S. address the current healthcare crisis. However, if you attack it on the assumption that healthcare is a right, then you worry more about covering everybody as opposed to covering each individual according to his needs and merits.

I think we should just throw money at the problem and reduce governmental involvement. As contrary to common knowledge as that sounds, I think that would destroy the problem. If we only simplified the system and just gave a monetary boost to those in NEED we could let economic growth take care of the rest. The government can’t ensure everyone get good healthcare; but it can and should ensure everyone have the opportunity to get good healthcare. If that is inadequate, then the problem is with the individual, not the system.
 
And you just repeat the same old rhetoric over and over again. Well guess what-it doesn’t work? It is apparent to me that the systme is going to collpase no matter what direction we go in. And if we continue in yours the rich will get richer and the disabled will be left behind to be poorer and poorer. Oh that’s right, that’s because they don’t work hard enough.:rolleyes: Another false accusation.
Jim, his repetition is in response to you repeating the same old rhetoric over and over again.

You keep advancing the same arguments, you have to expect to get the same rebuttals.😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top