Universal health insurance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Homerun40968
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
On the face of it a government run *insurance *scheme wouldn’t seem to be a bad idea at all. It wouldn’t be run with profit as its ultimate goal but could still make a profit, thus be no burden to the taxpayer, premiums would be low and other insurers would have to compete with it.
We have that here in California for Workers Comp. It operates autonomously and provides some of the best Workers Comp coverage around. It’s called SCIF and most employers want to use it because it has low rates and excellent service. You know…no massive overhead for advertising, to pay shareholders or to give the CEO billions of dollars in stock options and other benefits.
 
I can only speak for myself. My family Doctor, for something kind of serious ( not requiring emergency room) same day.

For something minor, about a week.

We have walk in clinics all over the place, where you walk in, they swipe your health card and you see a Family Doctor in about 45 minutes.

I rarely use walk in clinics, as I have my own Family Doctor.
Funny thing…my wait to see my primary care physician was 2 weeks (diabetes checkup) but once I had major foot pain, it was the next day.

Sounds like it would have worked out better for me in Canada and would have saved me a sleepless night of foot torment. Once I got my meds, I’m doing fine, but beforehand, it was not fun.
 
How about in Canada, people over 50 are denied dialysis because they are ‘too old’? You think rationed health care is the way to go?

What amazes me with the liberals is that they preach universal health care(a.k.a socialized medicine) which is nothing more than a bike tire that pops on its first go. So instead of trying to fix the old system, they continue to put patches on the broken tire hoping that will solve the problem.
:eek:

So, the Canadian system is a failure eh? Care to back that claim up, other than saying ’ Canadians go to American Hospitals all the time’.

Yes, the Canadian Universal Health care system has it’s problems, it is far from perfect, but it does work and every single person in the country has equal access to tax funded health care.

To dismiss the Canadian Health Care system as a complete failure is quite simply wrong.

Lets try and refrain from making such wide sweeping claims about things that we know nothing about.👍
 
How about in Canada, people over 50 are denied dialysis because they are ‘too old’? You think rationed health care is the way to go?

What amazes me with the liberals is that they preach universal health care(a.k.a socialized medicine) which is nothing more than a bike tire that pops on its first go. So instead of trying to fix the old system, they continue to put patches on the broken tire hoping that will solve the problem.
I’m not on these forums to BS anyone…that is simply not true. I know for a fact that that is not true, as I knew a man in his late 60’s who needed regular dialysis.

I would really like you to please cite your source of this information.

Not only did I know of a man in his late 60’s who had regular dialysis…but I have also never ever heard of this…:confused:

I should also add that I have a friend who is a nurse in a hospitals dialysis unit…
 
Whatevergirl,

Sorry about not getting back sooner. I’ve been working crazy hours and haven’t been able to get on the boards lately. Anyway, I don’t know if you checked out any of the documents or organizations that I had posted before but if not I found a good site that gives strait statistics on most countries. You can look but issue or you can look based on nation and create spreadsheets. It seemed like a good general all around site for data.

who.int/whosis/en/
 
I’m not on these forums to BS anyone…that is simply not true. I know for a fact that that is not true, as I knew a man in his late 60’s who needed regular dialysis.

I would really like you to please cite your source of this information.

Not only did I know of a man in his late 60’s who had regular dialysis…but I have also never ever heard of this…:confused:

I should also add that I have a friend who is a nurse in a hospitals dialysis unit…
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Weiner (Savage), FAUXNews, etc.
 
So, I’m curious are any of the neocons ever going to provide any evidence to support their position or should we go ahead and assume its all going to be anecdotes, emotions, paranoia and “type bites” from here on out?
 
So, I’m curious are any of the neocons ever going to provide any evidence to support their position or should we go ahead and assume its all going to be anecdotes, emotions, paranoia and “type bites” from here on out?
What’s a “neocon?”
 
So, I’m curious are any of the neocons ever going to provide any evidence to support their position or should we go ahead and assume its all going to be anecdotes, emotions, paranoia and “type bites” from here on out?
It’s due to repetition. Once something is repeated enough, it is believed without question. Right-wingers hear Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage-Weiner, FAUXNews, et al, repeat the same talking points all day long and no actual critical thinking takes place, only a repetition that leads to unquestioning belief.

Once I started thinking critically about what I was being told on the radio and FAUX News, I started to see that real life around me and what I was being told didn’t match up. In fact, much of the time, reality was the polar opposite.

Interestingly, that’s the same time when I seriously started down my trek from protestantism (which is ideological) to Catholicism (which is reality-based).
 
It’s due to repetition. Once something is repeated enough, it is believed without question. Right-wingers hear Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage-Weiner, FAUXNews, et al, repeat the same talking points all day long and no actual critical thinking takes place, only a repetition that leads to unquestioning belief.

Once I started thinking critically about what I was being told on the radio and FAUX News, I started to see that real life around me and what I was being told didn’t match up. In fact, much of the time, reality was the polar opposite.

Interestingly, that’s the same time when I seriously started down my trek from protestantism (which is ideological) to Catholicism (which is reality-based).
You’re only saying that because you’ve let your mindset be polluted by simplistic, PROTESTANT either/or style thinking. 😉
 
I’m not on these forums to BS anyone…that is simply not true. I know for a fact that that is not true, as I knew a man in his late 60’s who needed regular dialysis.

I would really like you to please cite your source of this information.

Not only did I know of a man in his late 60’s who had regular dialysis…but I have also never ever heard of this…:confused:

I should also add that I have a friend who is a nurse in a hospitals dialysis unit…
Trying to get evidence from right wingers on these things is futile, because, ultimately their strong dislike of socialized medicine has nothing to do with what does or doesn’t work. Thus they’re likely to say anything to back up their arguments.

With socialized medicine nobody gets treated, everyone dies waiting lists, and good honest middle class folk can’t afford any alternatives because they’re all paying 95% tax.

Apparently, anecdotes count as facts, and we must just take their word for it…
 
Trying to get evidence from right wingers on these things is futile, because, ultimately their strong dislike of socialized medicine has nothing to do with what does or doesn’t work. Thus they’re likely to say anything to back up their arguments.

With socialized medicine nobody gets treated, everyone dies waiting lists, and good honest middle class folk can’t afford any alternatives because they’re all paying 95% tax.

Apparently, anecdotes count as facts, and we must just take their word for it…
I noticed that your post is laced with anecdotes that you want us to count as fact.

The kidney dialysis issue is from England, not Canada. It is based on a Walter Williams radio show. Williams had set up calls with officials in various countries to talk about socialized medicine.

At the time, England did cut off dialysis for persons over 54. What shocked me was this dialog:

Williams: “So when a person reaches 54, you just tell him the government has decided it’s too expensive to keep him alive, and has decided to let him die?”

English official (in a shocked tone); “No! We would never do that. We tell him, ‘Medical science holds no hope for you.’”

In other words, they not only let him die to save money, they lied to him, to discourage him from seeking medical care elsewhere.

The conversation with the Canadian official was also interesting – it hinged around a man who needed a CAT scan, but couldn’t get one because the money for CAT scans had run out for the year. The same man had a dog, and the vet prescribed a CAT scan for the dog – and it was done at the hospital, on the idle CAT machine that the man could not use!!

The Canadian official proudly said the problem had been solved. It was now illegal to give dogs CAT scans in hospitals.😉
 
Let me follow up on the previous post. From townhall.com/Columnists/WalterEWilliams/2007/02/14/do_we_want_socialized_medicine

On the English system:
London’s Observer (3/3/02) carried a story saying that an “unpublished report shows some patients are now having to wait more than eight months for treatment, during which time many of their cancers become incurable.” Another story said, “According to a World Health Organisation report to be published later this year, around 10,000 British people die unnecessarily from cancer each year – three times as many as are killed on our roads.”
The Observer (12/16/01) also reported, “A recent academic study showed National Health Service delays in bowel cancer treatment were so great that, in one in five cases, cancer which was curable at the time of diagnosis had become incurable by the time of treatment.”
On the Canadian system:
The Vancouver, British Columbia-based Fraser Institute has a yearly publication titled, “Waiting Your Turn.” Its 2006 edition gives waiting times, by treatments, from a person’s referral by a general practitioner to treatment by a specialist. The shortest waiting time was for oncology (4.9 weeks). The longest waiting time was for orthopedic surgery (40.3 weeks), followed by plastic surgery (35.4 weeks) and neurosurgery (31.7 weeks).
Canadians face significant waiting times for various diagnostics such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scans. The median wait for a CT scan across Canada was 4.3 weeks, but in Prince Edward Island, it’s 9 weeks. A Canadian’s median wait for an MRI was 10.3 weeks, but in Newfoundland, patients waited 28 weeks. Finally, the median wait for an ultrasound was 3.8 weeks across Canada, but in Manitoba and Prince Edward Island it was 8 weeks.
There’s help for some Canadian patients. According to a Canadian Medical Association Journal article, “U.S. Hospitals Use Waiting-List Woes to Woo Canadians” (2/22/2000), “British Columbia patients fed up with sojourns on waiting lists as they await tests or treatment are being wooed by a hospital in Washington state that has begun offering package deals. A second U.S. hospital is also considering marketing its services.” One of the attractions is that an MRI, which can take anywhere from 10 to 28 weeks in Canada, can be had in two days at Olympic Memorial Hospital in Port Angeles, Wash. Already, Cleveland is Canada’s hip-replacement center.
 
I noticed that your post is laced with anecdotes that you want us to count as fact.

The kidney dialysis issue is from England, not Canada. It is based on a Walter Williams radio show. Williams had set up calls with officials in various countries to talk about socialized medicine.

At the time, England did cut off dialysis for persons over 54. What shocked me was this dialog:

Williams: “So when a person reaches 54, you just tell him the government has decided it’s too expensive to keep him alive, and has decided to let him die?”

English official (in a shocked tone); “No! We would never do that. We tell him, ‘Medical science holds no hope for you.’”

In other words, they not only let him die to save money, they lied to him, to discourage him from seeking medical care elsewhere.

The conversation with the Canadian official was also interesting – it hinged around a man who needed a CAT scan, but couldn’t get one because the money for CAT scans had run out for the year. The same man had a dog, and the vet prescribed a CAT scan for the dog – and it was done at the hospital, on the idle CAT machine that the man could not use!!

The Canadian official proudly said the problem had been solved. It was now illegal to give dogs CAT scans in hospitals.😉
Good one Vern, I heard a radio program and ( fill in the blanks).

I don’t believe it for a second, but even if it was true…

we still live longer, have a better infant mortality rate, cheaper prescriptions, we have more nurses, you have 0.2 more doctors per thousand people, the World Health Organization ranks us 30th best in the world, the USA at 37th, spend less money and every single citizen has health coverage.
 
Let me follow up on the previous post. From townhall.com/Columnists/WalterEWilliams/2007/02/14/do_we_want_socialized_medicine

On the English system:

On the Canadian system:
Longer wait times, but we still live longer, have a better infant mortality rate, cheaper prescriptions, we have more nurses, you have 0.2 more doctors per thousand people, the World Health Organization ranks us 30th best in the world, the USA at 37th, spend less money and every single citizen has health coverage.

Also, at the end of those wait times, the Canadian gets medical care.

I wonder how long an American without health insurance has to wait to get a new knee? Once again…

**
But, we still live longer, have a better infant mortality rate, cheaper prescriptions, we have more nurses, you have 0.2 more doctors per thousand people, the World Health Organization ranks us 30th best in the world, the USA at 37th, spend less money and every single citizen has health coverage.**

and Medicinal marijuana is legal and we have way cheaper prescription prices.
 
Longer wait times, but we still live longer, have a better infant mortality rate, cheaper prescriptions, we have more nurses, you have 0.2 more doctors per thousand people, the World Health Organization ranks us 30th best in the world, the USA at 37th, spend less money and every single citizen has health coverage.

Also, at the end of those wait times, the Canadian gets medical care.

I wonder how long an American without health insurance has to wait to get a new knee? Once again…

**
But, we still live longer, have a better infant mortality rate, cheaper prescriptions, we have more nurses, you have 0.2 more doctors per thousand people, the World Health Organization ranks us 30th best in the world, the USA at 37th, spend less money and every single citizen has health coverage.**

and Medicinal marijuana is legal and we have way cheaper prescription prices.
Well, gee, if you get legal marijuana . . .:rolleyes:
 
Vern,

Your sources of non anecdotal information are a radio show you heard, newspaper stories and an annual publication from a right-leaning organization. ‘What we think’:

fraserinstitute.org/aboutus/whatwethink.htm

The only valid info is from the Canadian Medical Association Journal, but there’s no record of such an article that I can find:

cmaj.ca/contents-by-date.2002.shtml

Can anybody prove that people over 50 don’t get dialysis In Canada :
How about in Canada, people over 50 are denied dialysis because they are ‘too old’? You think rationed health care is the way to go?
 
It is in the news a woman in the US waits for 24 hours for emergency care and dies in the waiting room. Great the neocons saved on taxes , she probably didn’t have money. The US for infant mortality, life span and other health factors rates very low compared to other countries. Pharmacy Company profits are up. That is why it is illegal to go to Canada and get the legal drugs one needs. People in Canada can come to the US for treatment, I wish we had the choice and their system. Rush doesn’t care because he gets all the drugs he needs illegally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top