Universal Jursidiction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Randy_Carson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep… you right in that we’re much closer to unity in Christ than in a long time. For our part, we must remain steadfast and not introduce novelties (ordination of women) and I think on your part what remains probably one of the hardest things ever for Pope to do - to counter the previous Papal dogmas of Papal Infallibility and (unbridled) Universal Jurisdiction.
Don’t you think God has the wisdom to give true understanding of the papacy to those to whom the papacy was given?

Or are we to assume that although God gave the papacy to the Roman Catholic Church, it’s actually the Orthodox or Lutherans or Anglicans to whom God gave true understanding of that office?

Ben, I think you need to consider the very real possibility that “non-papal” Christians are still trying to mold the papacy into something they can live with because they concluded long ago that they really would rather live without it.

I know this to be true because some Catholics are doing the same thing!
 
Ben, I think you need to consider the very real possibility that “non-papal” Christians are still trying to mold the papacy into something they can live with because they concluded long ago that they really would rather live without it.

I know this to be true because some Catholics are doing the same thing!
I understand what you’re saying, but the trouble for us is that the Papal office is trending to have ever-increasing power. Remember, this scares the willies out of us poor Lutherans who still have our confessions to remind us what a wayward Pope looks like.

We’ve grown accustomed to saintly Popes who never would abuse their power, but we have seen (our opinion) abuses before. But then again, this secular world could very well drive us beggars back to Rome.
 
I understand what you’re saying, but the trouble for us is that the Papal office is trending to have ever-increasing power. Remember, this scares the willies out of us poor Lutherans who still have our confessions to remind us what a wayward Pope looks like.

We’ve grown accustomed to saintly Popes who never would abuse their power, but we have seen (our opinion) abuses before. But then again, this secular world could very well drive us beggars back to Rome.
Ben-

May I politely suggest that you need to have a little more faith in God’s ability to protect His Church from wayward popes? He has so far.

Additionally, I think you need to consider that Jesus himself spoke of such things and this is recorded in the pages of Sacred Scripture. Take a look:

THE IMPACT OF SIN ON CHURCH AUTHORITY

If a Church leader is guilty of gross immorality, does his sin invalidate his position or authority?

Many, if not most, Protestants would say that it does, and they often use this line of reasoning to justify their denial of the authority of the Catholic Church. They cite historical events such as the Crusades, the Inquisition or reign of the Borgia Popes as evidence that the Church has lost its claim to moral and spiritual authority.

Such a response, however, is unbiblical. For example, Scripture states that Jesus knew “from the beginning” who would betray him – namely Judas, whom Jesus calls a “devil” (cf. John 6:64–71). This fact is significant, since Judas was selected as an apostle even though Jesus knew that he was corrupt.

Another example would be found in Jesus’ teaching on “Moses’ seat” found in the opening verses of Matthew 23: “Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: ‘The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.’” (Matthew 23:1-3)

“Moses’ seat” is a phrase that referred to a position of legitimate teaching authority held by the teachers of the law and the Pharisees. Later, Jesus condemned these men as “hypocrites,” “blind guides,” “blind fools,” “serpents,” and a “brood of vipers.” But in the passage above, Jesus specifically instructed the crowds and his disciples to obey these leaders – despite their corruption – because of the authority of their position. That is sobering stuff.

If it were true that immorality invalidated a religious leader’s authority, then why did Jesus command his followers to “obey and do everything” the scribes and Pharisees tell them? Jesus merely admonished his followers not to follow their hypocritical example. There is not even the slightest hint that their positions had been forfeited or abrogated because of their hypocrisy or immorality. If anything, the reverse is true because Jesus validated these leaders’ office by telling people to obey them. From this, we see that sin and corruption found in the individual office holders has no impact whatsoever on the authority of the office itself.

In the Parable of the Weeds found in Matthew 13, Jesus tells His disciples to anticipate corruption within the Church. He said:

Jesus told them another parable: "The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’ ‘An enemy did this,’ he replied. "The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’ ‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may root up the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’ (Matthew 13:24-30)

Notice it is not the world at large that is being described but rather the “kingdom of heaven” or Church that is portrayed as the field containing both wheat and weeds. Jesus does not indicate that weeds (sinners) should be uprooted from the field (Church) until the separation done at the time of the final harvest.

Of course, sin and corruption in Church leadership should never be condoned but neither should they surprise us. The Church is not a paradise for saints who are already perfected but a hospital for the spiritually sick who are being healed.

Jesus clearly taught that sin would be present in the Church, but He also taught that sins of individual Church leaders do not invalidate the authority of the positions those leaders hold. These sins, whether real or imagined, do not undermine the legitimate authority of the Catholic Church and do not provide an excuse for those who refuse to acknowledge and obey her. The authority given by God to the Church and the office of the Papacy is the same today as it was in the days of Peter, Linus, Anacletus and Clement because God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

Ben, you have nothing to fear and every reason to be obedient to God.
 
I understand what you’re saying, but the trouble for us is that the Papal office is trending to have ever-increasing power. Remember, this scares the willies out of us poor Lutherans who still have our confessions to remind us what a wayward Pope looks like.
This really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.

There has been, are and will be wayward Pastors, Priests, Bishops, Deacons, etc.

Is the Church still here? Yes.

Wayward Popes didn’t win. Christ did and does and will do.

We just don’t want one guy telling us what to do. That’s as old as Adam.
 
I understand what you’re saying, but the trouble for us is that the Papal office is trending to have ever-increasing power. Remember, this scares the willies out of us poor Lutherans who still have our confessions to remind us what a wayward Pope looks like.

We’ve grown accustomed to saintly Popes who never would abuse their power, but we have seen (our opinion) abuses before. But then again, this secular world could very well drive us beggars back to Rome.
Ben-

As a Catholic, I’m in no position to cast stones; however, I can point out an obvious truth: you guys have issues, too.

blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2012/04/minnesota_lutherans_demand_change_following_pastor_sex_scandal.php

So, your argument about scandalous popes rings hollow. In fact, while both of our churches have had bad leaders, I have less to be concerned about than you do.

I KNOW that God is protecting the Catholic Church because He built it and protects it via the charism of infallibility.

I don’t think you have any such assurance, because no matter what name you folks CALL your church, it’s still NOT the CATHOLIC CHURCH. :nope:
 
As a Catholic, I’m in no position to cast stones; however, I can point out an obvious truth: you guys have issues, too.
Oh, we’re even worse - we had to get rid of our fist Bishop in America. A little too in love with fornication and money.

I don’t think Lutherans would have too much issues with God protecting His church as of course we are here by God’s grace as well. May we respond to his Grace as He would have us.

P.S. I’m not sure I like your convincing tone! 🙂
You’re not putting up barriers so I can’t discount your arguments as easily. 👍
 
Ben, you have nothing to fear and every reason to be obedient to God.
But here’s the rub - God has placed me and my family in a place where I can receive the Gospel and the Sacraments. Even if I were persuaded that the Lutheran church was in wrong (and frankly, we’re a mess) I still would need convincing that the Gospel and the Sacraments were not sufficient.

That’s the hard hurdle with us Lutherans. You can convince us that our church is a hot-mess of craziness and we would still cling to the Gospel and Sacraments as a drowning man to a stick of wood. To pry us away, you have to convince us that turning our backs (even for an infinitely small moment) to those Graces is condoned by God.
 
But here’s the rub - God has placed me and my family in a place where I can receive the Gospel and the Sacraments. Even if I were persuaded that the Lutheran church was in wrong (and frankly, we’re a mess) I still would need convincing that the Gospel and the Sacraments were not sufficient.

That’s the hard hurdle with us Lutherans. You can convince us that our church is a hot-mess of craziness and we would still cling to the Gospel and Sacraments as a drowning man to a stick of wood. To pry us away, you have to convince us that turning our backs (even for an infinitely small moment) to those Graces is condoned by God.
If I may - interrupt…Do you believe that the Lutheran Church has the Gospel and Sacraments and that the Catholic Church does not?

I don’t ask this to be argumentative or accusatory…I’m just trying to understand your position on this point.

Peace
James
 
But here’s the rub - God has placed me and my family in a place where I can receive the Gospel and the Sacraments. Even if I were persuaded that the Lutheran church was in wrong (and frankly, we’re a mess) I still would need convincing that the Gospel and the Sacraments were not sufficient.

That’s the hard hurdle with us Lutherans. You can convince us that our church is a hot-mess of craziness and we would still cling to the Gospel and Sacraments as a drowning man to a stick of wood. To pry us away, you have to convince us that turning our backs (even for an infinitely small moment) to those Graces is condoned by God.
Ben-

I’m not sure that the Gospel is different. So, that’s not an issue.

As for the sacraments, we could go round and round about them concerning this technical issue or that definition, but at the end of the day, we’ve got seven sacraments and scriptural evidence to suggest that all of them were instituted by Jesus.

So, what part of the Gospel truth or the Sacraments do you have now that Lutherans did not receive originally from the Catholic Church?

What exactly would you be turning your back on that we do not have in its fullness and more?
 
If I may - interrupt…Do you believe that the Lutheran Church has the Gospel and Sacraments and that the Catholic Church does not?

I don’t ask this to be argumentative or accusatory…I’m just trying to understand your position on this point.

Peace
James
No, not at all! And thanks for asking!

I spend a significant amount of time encouraging lapsed Catholics to get back into their Catholic pews!

Some Lutherans have a prohibition on receiving the Body and Blood of Christ twice in one day - the reasoning is that it make it look like you may feel that the first Communion wasn’t sufficient.

Same way with Church - if we feel that God’s Gospel and Sacraments are sufficient, we better well act like it. It’s also why you’ll find many confessional Lutherans stuck in the ELCA - we really aren’t Donatists.
 
So, what part of the Gospel truth or the Sacraments do you have now that Lutherans did not receive originally from the Catholic Church?

What exactly would you be turning your back on that we do not have in its fullness and more?
We wouldn’t quite term it that way - we don’t think of ourselves as splitting off from the Catholic church, but if I understand the question, I personally don’t see a deficiency in the Catholic church.

However, I’m convinced by Grace and Faith that my church is sufficient - so there really is no need for me to look beyond the Cross and the shabby walls of my church.

Think of it like being married - I can appreciate other pretty and kind women, but I’m not hopping from one bed to another no matter the temptation. My wife is good!
 
No, not at all! And thanks for asking!

I spend a significant amount of time encouraging lapsed Catholics to get back into their Catholic pews!

Some Lutherans have a prohibition on receiving the Body and Blood of Christ twice in one day - the reasoning is that it make it look like you may feel that the first Communion wasn’t sufficient.

Same way with Church - if we feel that God’s Gospel and Sacraments are sufficient, we better well act like it. It’s also why you’ll find many confessional Lutherans stuck in the ELCA - we really aren’t Donatists.
Thanks…So - if the thing you are hanging on to is the Gospel and the Sacraments - and since you believe that these are found in both communions…It rather raises the other issues a bit in importance. In this I refer to your earlier comment about the Lutheran church being a mess.

Since, in your view both communions have what is essential to you, doesn’t it make sense to look for the one that is less of a mess?

I hope that comes out right…😊…no offense intended…maybe i should just leave this to you and Randy…😉

Anyway - just asking…

Peace
James
 
We wouldn’t quite term it that way - we don’t think of ourselves as splitting off from the Catholic church, but if I understand the question, I personally don’t see a deficiency in the Catholic church.

However, I’m convinced by Grace and Faith that my church is sufficient - so there really is no need for me to look beyond the Cross and the shabby walls of my church.

Think of it like being married - I can appreciate other pretty and kind women, but I’m not hopping from one bed to another no matter the temptation. My wife is good!
If you need shabby walls to feel at home, we can set you up in a humble Franciscan parish. But since you brought up the marriage analogy…

The Church is the Bride of Christ

796 The unity of Christ and the Church, head and members of one Body, also implies the distinction of the two within a personal relationship. This aspect is often expressed by the image of bridegroom and bride. The theme of Christ as Bridegroom of the Church was prepared for by the prophets and announced by John the Baptist.234 The Lord referred to himself as the "bridegroom."235 The Apostle speaks of the whole Church and of each of the faithful, members of his Body, as a bride “betrothed” to Christ the Lord so as to become but one spirit with him.236 The Church is the spotless bride of the spotless Lamb.237 "Christ loved the Church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her."238 He has joined her with himself in an everlasting covenant and never stops caring for her as for his own body:239

This is the whole Christ, head and body, one formed from many . . . whether the head or members speak, it is Christ who speaks. He speaks in his role as the head (ex persona capitis) and in his role as body (ex persona corporis). What does this mean? "The two will become one flesh. This is a great mystery, and I am applying it to Christ and the Church."240 And the Lord himself says in the Gospel: "So they are no longer two, but one flesh."241 They are, in fact, two different persons, yet they are one in the conjugal union, . . . as head, he calls himself the bridegroom, as body, he calls himself “bride.”

+++

Ben-

As a baptized Christian, you are in communion with the Catholic Church, the Bride of Christ. As a formal member of the Lutheran Church, your communion with the Catholic Church is imperfect. As someone who has spent a considerable amount of time in these forums learning about the Catholic faith and the claims of the Catholic Church, your ignorance is probably no longer invincible.

I encourage you to consider formal communion with the one Bride of the Bridegroom. :yup:
 
Thanks…So - if the thing you are hanging on to is the Gospel and the Sacraments - and since you believe that these are found in both communions…It rather raises the other issues a bit in importance. In this I refer to your earlier comment about the Lutheran church being a mess.

Since, in your view both communions have what is essential to you, doesn’t it make sense to look for the one that is less of a mess?
James, James…are you sure that’s us? 😛
 
Since, in your view both communions have what is essential to you, doesn’t it make sense to look for the one that is less of a mess?

I hope that comes out right…😊…no offense intended…
No offence taken at all - I appreciate the dialog! 🙂

As someone who now and then makes passing glances at the Orthodox church (and appreciates the Catholic church) , I can certainly understand the desire to find the ‘best’ church.

But again, I’m not comfortable at advising anybody to do that as more often than not (I’m afraid based on experience here in Seattle) it can lead to a diminished faith. I’ve seen it especially keenly with Catholics here who became disillusioned with certain aspects of the church in the post Vatican II era and began to church hop - now their children are secular. 😦

I also have an opportunity to correct some of our problems and strengthen the church where it’s needed as well.

The idea of finding a best church also troubles me too and I understand I’m deeply unwise - I’m hopefully just enough to eschew the contemporary worship church down the street, but to modern sensibilities the rock-band liturgy and coffee bar look to be tempting lures.

Now… please don’t let my objections keep you from using that argument with other Christians. There’s plenty of people that need to hear it!
 
As someone who has spent a considerable amount of time in these forums learning about the Catholic faith and the claims of the Catholic Church, your ignorance is probably no longer invincible.
That’s why we Lutherans drink beer - kills those pesky Catholic brain cells that keep forming. :whacky:

If you’re right - Let me hope that God will see fit to put us prideful Lutherans in Catholic purgatory to make us really repent.
I encourage you to consider formal communion with the one Bride of the Bridegroom. :yup:
I appreciate the truly Christian love and that you have that lays out such a kind invitation.
 
I’ll respond to this one, as we’re going in circles.

You’re assuming a predicate that we don’t see - 500 years ago the catholic church (in our view) was promulgating a teaching that was potentially putting souls in danger of thinking they could purchase their way out of purgatory and into heaven, and perhaps thinking money could solve deeper problems.

That is what we reacted to - we didn’t remove ourselves from this horrid situation as a lark, but as a response to some rather horrid circumstances.

We didn’t react against a perfect teacher, or whatever your analogy, we reacted to some pretty cruddy stuff.

Thankfully, the rest of the Catholic church reacted to eventually - you no longer holds those teachings.
Which teachings are you talking about? We hold the same teachings that we held at the time of the reformation.

You also haven’t answered the question. As a student, all I can do is object saying “this looks fishy”. But once the authorities take a look and decide, the matter is settled. What we see with Protestants is that instead they got together and started their own University.

Is that reasonable?
 
That’s why we Lutherans drink beer - kills those pesky Catholic brain cells that keep forming. :whacky:

If you’re right - Let me hope that God will see fit to put us prideful Lutherans in Catholic purgatory to make us really repent.
The problem is that you assume you will go to Purgatory. It is very possible that if you knowingly ignore Graces to leave the Lutheran faith and enter the truth, you will go that other place.

So I am not sure we should treat it as a funny matter 🙂
 
Which teachings are you talking about? We hold the same teachings that we held at the time of the reformation.

You also haven’t answered the question. As a student, all I can do is object saying “this looks fishy”. But once the authorities take a look and decide, the matter is settled. What we see with Protestants is that instead they got together and started their own University.

Is that reasonable?
Nice post except that the protestants never “got together”…They each went their own way.

To me that is perhaps THE fundamental flaw in a movement that was to be built on the principle of Sola Scriptura and a reforming of the Church.
Scriptural accounts simply did not allow for the sort of fracturing that one finds - right from the beginning - in protestantism.

Peace
James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top