Gerry Hunter:
A vaccine does not seek to introduce into the body something that mimics the symptoms of a disease, nor does it introduce a pathogen. The active item in a vaccine is either a debilitated form of the pathogen – it cannot function to produce the disease – or else a related organism that triggers an immune response by the recipient which will effectively neutralize the target pathogen – cow pox, for instance, triggered the production of antibodies which were effective against small pox (in the early vaccines for that disease).
I was referring to homeopathic nosodes. Nosodes are exactly what vaccines are; in fact, in many areas, it is possible to receive homeopathics as an alternative to standard vaccines.
Vaccinations are a part of homeopathy that has come to be used in standard medical practice, although I know that most allopathis practitioners would like not to acknowledge this…
The example I think of is flu shots. If there is a homeopathic physician in your area, you can receive the influenza nosodes in a series of oral doses. This functions on a comparable level of efficiency as regular flu shots.
It is perfectly true that there is a difference to be made between this & the use of an OTC homeopathic remedy for protection against flu, however, & you are right to point it out.
My thrust was to say that when we are dealing with either homeopathics or with other forms of alternative medicines, there is a tendency to think of all of them as “new age”, with no scientific backing. Not true!! There are many other forms of medicine than what one receives from the average physician, & few of them are anything to do with “divination”, as the OP had been told. Those that do have a connection, it is usually the fault of the particular practitioner, not the system of healing.
I have used homeopathics for decades, with no recourse to anything remotely new age, & received great benefit from them. At
no time did this involve magic, superstition, or “woo-woo” thinking.
God bless.