as thought it was simply to draw people’s attention to the altar, as the bread/wine are being turned into the Body and Blood of Christ. Especially back then when masses were celebrated in latin and some might not understand when consecration is happening.
Additianol question, does your parish add anything else than bells? My parish and most church in my country uses a gong while the priest is lifting up the Eucharist/Chalice
They could understand the Latin fine. They simply couldn’t hear because there were no microphones.
If you go to a Latin Mass today in a large Church, you will understand. I’ve attended a number of Latin Masses in the Cathedral Basilica of St. Peter & Paul in Philadelphia and you quickly understand why the bells are there. Not only can you not hear the priest when he’s praying the words of concentration but sometimes its hard to actually see the elevation because depending on where you are sitting, you can be very far away from the priest. Or you could also be sitting in pews with obstructed views of the Altar.
A lot of the mass is prayed with the priest using a normal voice. Very few parts of the mass required the priest to raise his voice loud enough to be heard. This was mostly limited to the Liturgy of the Word, Sermon and the few other times he was addressing everyone.
Without microphones, the only people who can typically hear him are the deacon, subdeacon, servers, and maybe some priests/clerics/religious sitting in choir. Unless the mass was being prayed in a small church or side chapel, many of laity most likely could not hear him. And if the altar was white, they may not even notice the elevation
So that’s why we have the bells.
HOWEVER, today, the bells still let us know that something important is happening at that very moment. For a person who is not Catholic or is not catechized, the ringing of the bells lets them know that something very important is happening. So even in today’s world of microphones, the bells still have a purpose.
God bless!