Using birth control to simply skip periods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlottethelg
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Charlottethelg

Guest
I was wondering if it is immoral to take birth control to skip or have fewer periods. I’m a lifeguard, but I really hate tampons. I don’t have heavy periods or anything like that, I just hate using tampons. I’m still a virgin and will be until marriage, that is not the reason I’m interested in birth control. Is it all right to take it to have fewer periods? Or, is it still immoral?

Thank you so much for your time in reading this!

~Charlotte
 
I was wondering if it is immoral to take birth control to skip or have fewer periods. I’m a lifeguard, but I really hate tampons. I don’t have heavy periods or anything like that, I just hate using tampons. I’m still a virgin and will be until marriage, that is not the reason I’m interested in birth control. Is it all right to take it to have fewer periods? Or, is it still immoral?

Thank you so much for your time in reading this!

~Charlotte
I would say in my opinion this would never be a good idea. The list of symptoms and complications that the pill can cause are not worth the risk for what you would be trying to get out of it. Just looking at it from a practical standpoint, I would say don’t do it. This is only a moral issue in so far as taking the pill would possibly damage your body and the risks are not worth the gains. The pill is a serious drug and should not be taken off hand. Drastically changing the way our bodies work is not something to take lightly.
 
I don’t think it would be immoral. I do think it would be inadvisable. As the person above indicated, the pill is not without side effects. There is even the chance of making you infertile. I would avoid it myself.
 
The most important thing is to ask a priest. But, considering that according to the Church, the immoral thing about hormone therapy is ‘contraception’, and if you are truly not sexually active and/or trying to avoid conception, then according to those criteria it is not a sin. Artificial contraception is sinful. Taking meds to stop menustration is not. But it is unwise to take unnecessary medications to stop the body from doing what it does normally. If you feel the potential and real risks do not outweigh the benefits, then go for it. But I’d urge you to do more research. I do know that a lot of swimmers and other atheletes like to take meds to stop getting their periods, but it’s not a smart thing to do due to the side effects of the medications themselves.
 
I was wondering if it is immoral to take birth control to skip or have fewer periods. I’m a lifeguard, but I really hate tampons. I don’t have heavy periods or anything like that, I just hate using tampons. I’m still a virgin and will be until marriage, that is not the reason I’m interested in birth control. Is it all right to take it to have fewer periods? Or, is it still immoral?

Thank you so much for your time in reading this!

~Charlotte
Immoral? Probably not. But it’s a really bad idea! I would unload any doctor who would write you a perscription for that reason. Those chemicals are very risky business!
 
You know the World Health Organisation? They’re quite a pro-abortion bunch…

They list the pill as a carcinogenic. Like cigarrettes and abestos.

We’re not supposed to give medical advice on this site, but is that soemthing you want to put in your body for such a frivolous reason?
 
I was wondering if it is immoral to take birth control to skip or have fewer periods. I’m a lifeguard, but I really hate tampons. I don’t have heavy periods or anything like that, I just hate using tampons. I’m still a virgin and will be until marriage, that is not the reason I’m interested in birth control. Is it all right to take it to have fewer periods? Or, is it still immoral?

Thank you so much for your time in reading this!

~Charlotte
If you had a condition for which ABC could control the symptoms, I would say that it’s not immoral. I’m not sure about using ABC because of being a lifeguard. A priest can better advise whether this would fall under a medical exception.

This is from WebMD. I would take this caution seriously. While some doctors are quick to point out how safe and effective this is, there are others who are not so sure that we have not had enough time yet to discover the long-term consequences of fooling with horomones in such a manner.

"Other doctors, however, urge caution. They say continuous birth control may increase the amount of estrogen and progesterone that some women take in their lifetimes. The health effects of this experiment in convenience may not be known for years. After all, millions of menopausal women took hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for decades before the risks became evident.

If you look at the normal physiology of the menstrual cycle, things like the breasts and the liver need a break from continuous high estrogen, and there’s a break during that time around the menstrual flow," says Jerilynn Prior, MD, a professor of endocrinology at the University of British Columbia. “People who are touting this method say, ‘Well, women years ago didn’t get their periods as much as we do now,’ but it isn’t the same thing.” In the old days, women didn’t get their period as often because they were pregnant or breastfeeding, thus their lifetime estrogen levels were lower than today.

Prior’s colleague, Christine Hitchcock, PhD, researches menstrual cycles and ovulation. She worries that we also don’t know if continuous birth control could affect fertility. “The use of extended birth control pills is suppressing a complex, intricate hormonal system,” she says. “There are no long-term data to show whether changing the schedule of birth control affects how fast your periods come back when you go off, whether they come back, and your level of fertility.”
 
I was wondering if it is immoral to take birth control to skip or have fewer periods. I’m a lifeguard, but I really hate tampons. I don’t have heavy periods or anything like that, I just hate using tampons. I’m still a virgin and will be until marriage, that is not the reason I’m interested in birth control. Is it all right to take it to have fewer periods? Or, is it still immoral?

Thank you so much for your time in reading this!

~Charlotte
No great philosophical point but I agree with you 100% on tampons - wouldn’t use them now let alone before I got married.
 
I don’t think many doctors would give you a prescription for birth control if your intent is to simply skip all periods.

Maybe try different period protection? I hate tampons; I use Instead softcups. 12 hour protection and no drying effects. Good for swimming and sex, although the last bit doesn’t apply to you.
 
I was on and off the pill for years.

I never got any of the visible side effects like weight gain and such…and it did improve my periods…but it wasn’t worth it at all.

I wouldn’t recommend it…as I got older and a bit wiser, I did more research and what I read scared me to death…I stopped taking the pill and started doing my own research into NFP…before I made the decision to come back to the church.

I was a lifeguard too…for many years. Personally, I think that putting up with tampons during work hours for the one week you have your period is a far and away a better choice then risking your health for just period control with a drug that has side effects and can be dangerous to take.

It’s kind of like using a blow torch to light a candle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top