J
James924
Guest
Although we, retrospectively, know that Saint Athanasius was not in the wrong, was Pope Liberius’ excommunication of him still technically and canonically a valid excommunication?
I get the feeling that between this and the other thread, you’re trying to either:Although we, retrospectively, know that Saint Athanasius was not in the wrong, was Pope Liberius’ excommunication of him still technically and canonically a valid excommunication?
Seeing as I do not know the answers and do not yet have an opinion, either of them (1 or 2) is fine, so long as it leads to the truth. Both Econe and the fall of Liberius are new topics that I am recently delving into.I get the feeling that between this and the other thread, you’re trying to either:
I’m leaning towards the first one, that you want to prove they weren’t valid, but I could be wrong.
- Prove that Archbishop Lefebvre excommunication was invalid or never happened, so you can argue this with those who say that it was.
- Prove that it did happen so you can have arguments to use against those who say it didn’t.
I cannot answer your question according to modern Roman/Latin Catholic theory, but I am interested in the responses you get. It is a good question, and you deserve a straightforward answer.Although we, retrospectively, know that Saint Athanasius was not in the wrong, was Pope Liberius’ excommunication of him still technically and canonically a valid excommunication?
This is my absolute favorite metaphor ever!!!derailed faster on these forums than a rocket full of monkeys
It is and it does. Any Greek sources to recommend?It is a good question, and you deserve a straightforward answer.