D
DVIN_CKS
Guest
I think Nance has a point…to some degree.
If a man’s vasectomy is something that he can afford (both monetarily and health wise) to reverse, then why doesn’t he consider it? If he realizes that getting sterilized was a terrible mistake and against what the Church teaches wouldn’t he want to “right his wrong”? Seeking forgiveness in confession with a priest would certainly be required as the first step. But if the guy really wants to live a life that reflects the Church’s teaching on marital love and being open to life, then it seems his next logical step would be to seek a reversal of his vasectomy.
Assumming a man has the money to pay for one, why doesn’t he go get it done?
My thoughts…I think it is easier to stay closed to life (procreatively speaking here) than to run the risk of bringing another child into the world. The couple would have to learn NFP and the challenges that that birth control method requires from spouses. I really don’t think most men (and even their wives) want to be bothered with having to “open that particular door” again after it has been shut for so long. It is easier to go to confession and later say, “If I had it to do all over again, I wouldn’t but that was a sin of the past…” How many sins of our past do we actually get a chance to truly make up for? Not many. We can’t get back a child that was aborted. We can’t physically reclaim our virginity once taken or erase all the fornicating we did prior to marriage. Wouldn’t it be a great penance if we chould though? I think what Nance is trying to say is that men should take a vasectomy reversal on as their personal penance since it is something that is reversable and in their power to fix.
I think it just goes to show that “contraception” is a matter of the heart. For folks who have grown up and been raised in a contraception culture and who have never had great guidance on the matter from the church (maybe even conflicting ideas from priests) then it is understandable that what has been so deeply ingrained in their thinking about being open to children at every single act of marital love is going to take a lot of “de-programming”. Actually, only by the grace of God will men and women’s hearts change.
The question really boils down to “How open to life are you REALLY?”
If a man’s vasectomy is something that he can afford (both monetarily and health wise) to reverse, then why doesn’t he consider it? If he realizes that getting sterilized was a terrible mistake and against what the Church teaches wouldn’t he want to “right his wrong”? Seeking forgiveness in confession with a priest would certainly be required as the first step. But if the guy really wants to live a life that reflects the Church’s teaching on marital love and being open to life, then it seems his next logical step would be to seek a reversal of his vasectomy.
Assumming a man has the money to pay for one, why doesn’t he go get it done?
My thoughts…I think it is easier to stay closed to life (procreatively speaking here) than to run the risk of bringing another child into the world. The couple would have to learn NFP and the challenges that that birth control method requires from spouses. I really don’t think most men (and even their wives) want to be bothered with having to “open that particular door” again after it has been shut for so long. It is easier to go to confession and later say, “If I had it to do all over again, I wouldn’t but that was a sin of the past…” How many sins of our past do we actually get a chance to truly make up for? Not many. We can’t get back a child that was aborted. We can’t physically reclaim our virginity once taken or erase all the fornicating we did prior to marriage. Wouldn’t it be a great penance if we chould though? I think what Nance is trying to say is that men should take a vasectomy reversal on as their personal penance since it is something that is reversable and in their power to fix.
I think it just goes to show that “contraception” is a matter of the heart. For folks who have grown up and been raised in a contraception culture and who have never had great guidance on the matter from the church (maybe even conflicting ideas from priests) then it is understandable that what has been so deeply ingrained in their thinking about being open to children at every single act of marital love is going to take a lot of “de-programming”. Actually, only by the grace of God will men and women’s hearts change.
The question really boils down to “How open to life are you REALLY?”