L
Lazerlike42
Guest
I have done a lot more reading on Fr. Amorth than just this article. The facts and tone that has come across from him throughout what I have read have always been those that didn’t quite add up. The matter of the 30,000 exorcisms is not the way you are speculating, at least not the way he has described it in other interviews.Ok, I read that.
I am not sure why a lay person (Edward Peters) is criticizing a priest, though. He didn’t seem to show any mark of respect in his book review.
“He makes the claim to have performed 30,000 exorcisms over nine years”.
I see no problem with this statement, because an imprecatory prayer (commanding the enemy directly) is also considered to be a solemn exorcism. Fr. Amorth did say that some of them only took minutes. He was obviously not performing public formal exorcisms.
So, I can’t give the other statements Peters makes about Fr. Amorth much credence, either. He is obviously painting a grim picture and seems to be looking to interpret things in an unfavorable light.
Besides, I would think that the Pope would be making sure his own exorcist was in line.
hurst
In any case, Ed Peters is a very knowledgable and well educated canon lawyer. Are you suggesting that a lay person ought to never criticize a priest?