Vatican II Happened for a reason

  • Thread starter Thread starter adstrinity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What was the reason for Vatican II? Very simple. The “George Jetson” mentality invaded the Church. For those too young to remember, the mid '60s while Vatican II was in full swing was a time that embodied the space-age, futuristic, we- can-do-anything-we-want times. Throw open the windows! Bring on “The New Springtime” to the Church!

But SURPRISE…check out the spoiled fruits Vatican II produced as evidenced in the February 2009 edition of The Angelus Magazine. It lists 18 different religious orders from the Jesuits to the Franciscans to the Benedictines, and on and on and all of them without exception show a breathtaking 92-100% decline in seminarians from 1965 to 2000 (and it’s probably even worse now). Anyone who thinks Vatican II was a success for the Church is delusional.
 
It wasn’t the Council that led to the decline of the Church in America; that’s really the classic A preceded B, therefore A caused B. It was the death of the Catholic neighborhood that ended that time in America, and the death of the Catholic neighborhood was caused by the death of the inner-city, and the abandonment of the inner-city by American society at large.

Many Catholic neighborhoods (including the two that my parents grew up in) made it as far as the middle of the 1970’s, and then disintegrated with the rest of the city. Vatican II didn’t cause drug use to skyrocket and kids to drop dead in the middle of their streets from abusing them. It didn’t cause white flight out of the suburbs, or Richard Nixon to dismantle the Great Society.

Once the Catholic neighborhood broke up, though, the idea of the parish as the center of life died with it. You weren’t walking to Mass on Sunday morning anymore, and the Catholic school gym wasn’t where you played basketball. Now people were in the suburbs, and they had no neighborhood, or they were still in a city with nothing but memories of how great things used to be.

No Vatican council could have predicted or prevented that. Whether the Mass was in English, Latin, or Mandarin Chinese, we’d still face the problem that the old Catholic neighborhoods died, and they were going to die without or without a new form of the Mass.
Ok, even if that does explain America, what about the rest of the Western world?
 
Being Catholic used to require serious effort, but around the time of V2, it was decided that everything had to become easier, more acceptable, less offensive etc. People were taught that the one true faith was no different than any other faith and that all roads led to heaven. It got so easy that many people simply decided the easiest thing of all was to just not come to church anymore.
Code:
            In 1970 if you were moving away from your parish in Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, etc to the suburbs, your fellow parishoners would no doubt tell you that you were lucky, but if you had made that same statement 50 years earlier, they would have looked at you with disbelief and said "You're moving away from the church" ? 

           Did even 1pct of the laity bother to read V2 in the 60's ? Probably not, but a multitude of liberal priest did, and they used it to very successfully marginalise the importance of being Catholic for the masses.
 
People were taught that the one true faith was no different than any other faith and that all roads led to heaven.
Sorry, I do not remember what Vatican II document shares this New Age optic, could You help me with some specific reference ? Sincerely, I do not trust there are any such document until I see it, rather I think this must be an erroneous interpretantion or something like this.
 
Sorry, I do not remember what Vatican II document shares this New Age optic, could You help me with some specific reference ? Sincerely, I do not trust there are any such document until I see it, rather I think this must be an erroneous interpretantion or something like this.
Vatican ll never said such a thing. Alot of people don’t like the idea of inter-religious dialogue so they take it to an extreme saying that Vatican ll made all religions right or something like that.

The Church talks about certain aspects of some religions that contain fragments of the truth ( like “Don’t kill” and “Pray to God” ) but ultimately, The Catholic Church contains the complete fullness of truth.
 
I Believe,

Thank you for posting this information. Why don’t you start a thread on this subject?
Actually I did last June when I first learned of it. I posted here in the TC forum, but it was moved to Apologetics.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=245840&highlight=The+Permanent+Instruction+Of+The+Alta+Vendita

A lot of folks dismiss any “masonic infiltration” as conspiracy theory, and then when they see the document and learn of Popes accepting it as authentic, and writing on it, the naysayers clam up. As we can see, it’s even being ignored on this thread.

I think the thread I started would have gotten more play if it were left here in TC, but for whatever reason it was moved. I never inquired why. Feel free to revive it if you like.
 
Code:
            In 1970 if you were moving away from your parish in Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, etc to the suburbs, your fellow parishoners would no doubt tell you that you were lucky, but if you had made that same statement 50 years earlier, they would have looked at you with disbelief and said "You're moving away from the church" ?
Holy moly, what sort of June Cleaver world are you living in? My parents, grandparents and great grandparents, being European, were forced by politics and war among other things to regularly move from town to country, country to town, region to region - and in numerous cases flee to other countries as well.

I’ve moved numerous times - especially over the last ten years - as well.

None of which has stopped them or me from being anything less than devout Catholics.

Are you suggesting that changing your address somehow causes people to lose faith? Where’s your evidence for this?
 
Holy moly, what sort of June Cleaver world are you living in? My parents, grandparents and great grandparents, being European, were forced by politics and war among other things to regularly move from town to country, country to town, region to region - and in numerous cases flee to other countries as well.

I’ve moved numerous times - especially over the last ten years - as well.

None of which has stopped them or me from being anything less than devout Catholics.

Are you suggesting that changing your address somehow causes people to lose faith? Where’s your evidence for this?
Lily,

Long before WWI in this country, if you were not white, anglo-saxon and protestant, you were not welcome in many areas. This is a situation both sides of my family experienced VERY keenly, one family in NY the other in Pa. Moving around wasn’t common because prior to WWII people were poor, for the most part. There was no Middle Class.

Things changed quickly WWII as immigrants “lost their accents”, became educated thanks to the Veterans Education Bills, assimilated, and became as heterodox as their protestant neighbors.
 
Lily,

Long before WWI in this country, if you were not white, anglo-saxon and protestant, you were not welcome in many areas. This is a situation both sides of my family experienced VERY keenly, one family in NY the other in Pa. Moving around wasn’t common because prior to WWII people were poor, for the most part. There was no Middle Class.

Things changed quickly WWII as immigrants “lost their accents”, became educated thanks to the Veterans Education Bills, assimilated, and became as heterodox as their protestant neighbors.
Again, where’s your evidence that a change of location causes one to lose one’s faith?
 
Again, where’s your evidence that a change of location causes one to lose one’s faith?
Lily,

I didn’t argue that a change of location causes one to lose one’s faith.

I was pointing out that prior to the Second World War most people stayed put due to the prejudices of the native population (themselves the children/grandchildren/greatgrandchildren of Immigrants), and the fact that they were poor.

This mobile Society in which we live is almost as a new a development as are the “innovations” wrought by the disordered “spirit” of the Second Vatican Council.
 
Lily,

I didn’t argue that a change of location causes one to lose one’s faith.

I was pointing out that prior to the Second World War most people stayed put due to the prejudices of the native population (themselves the children/grandchildren/greatgrandchildren of Immigrants), and the fact that they were poor.

This mobile Society in which we live is almost as a new a development as are the “innovations” wrought by the disordered “spirit” of the Second Vatican Council.
The original comment was actually made by Seamus, not you. I’d like to hear what he has to say about it since he made it. He especially seems to relate moving physically to abandoning the Church - I’ve yet to see the connection.

Like I said, if you were living in a June Cleaver world maybe you never moved.

If you were living in the real world of my parents, grandparents and great grandparents then travel and moving were both commonplace and well-accepted. To the point where on my father’s side, and to a lesser extent my mother’s, it was the people who stayed put in the one village or town their whole lives who were the extreme oddities, not the mobile ones.

It’s not like immigration into the US, Australia or most other countries ceased, or slowed down, at any point that I’m aware of between about the post-Civil War era and WWII, certainly - apart from a temporary blip during the Great Depression.
 
The original comment was actually made by Seamus, not you. I’d like to hear what he has to say about it since he made it. He especially seems to relate moving physically to abandoning the Church - I’ve yet to see the connection.

Like I said, if you were living in a June Cleaver world maybe you never moved.

If you were living in the real world of my parents, grandparents and great grandparents then travel and moving were both commonplace and well-accepted. To the point where on my father’s side, and to a lesser extent my mother’s, it was the people who stayed put in the one village or town their whole lives who were the extreme oddities, not the mobile ones.

It’s not like immigration into the US, Australia or most other countries ceased, or slowed down, at any point that I’m aware of between about the post-Civil War era and WWII, certainly - apart from a temporary blip during the Great Depression.
Lily,

In the larger sense of this discussion, I don’t believe we’re talking about the world that the Immigrants came from, but the one in which they settled. America. I am second generation American on both sides of my family, all of whose roots are in Italy. If one went back about 5 generations on my maternal grandfather’s side, those roots are found in Croatia. Both of my parents have talked about the indignities they themselves and their parents and grandparents suffered because of their language and accents (my father’s, born in America, first language was a dialect of Italian, not learning English until going to school).

Both of my parents grew up in the Church, with a Catholic education. My mother was sent to Public HS, as was my father (who was the second to youngest of 16 children). As their families assimilated by “losing” their accents, and “joining” the middle class (both sides of the family were merchants in some sense–owning their own businesses, some as cobblers, some as builders), they were able to leave the “ghettoes” where they were forced to live. In the case of my father’s family, it wasn’t until the early 1970’s that many of his brothers and sisters and their families were ABLE to buy homes in different parts of town. In the case of my mother’s, it wasn’t until my grandfather built a “sub-division” in a part of Long Island that they were able have a home outside of the “Italian” section. Up until the 1970’s ethnic “neighborhoods” on Long Island were still pretty common.

Now my point is an easy one, and I am only speaking of my family’s experience here about which I’d like you to be clear. The Church was the center of the community in both my parents’ childhoods, until their families “made it.” When this happened, in both families–one family in NY, the other in Pa, they basically left the bosom of the Church. their children (me, my brothers and sisters and cousins) all received the Sacraments, but were not brought to Church or even expected to go after Confirmation. Church was treated as a tolerated necessity (more for the grandparents’ benefit).

My parents–both of whom had graduate degrees and were educators-- bought into the whole sexual revolution, but only to the extent that when they decided 5 children were enough (the fifth died in my mother’s womb at the beginning of her 8th month, at the time they did not surgically remove the dead child, but allowed the body to expel the dead child–my mother carried her dead baby in her womb for about 6 weeks until her body expelled him) they contracepted–and this was before it was ‘legal’ to buy prophylactics in NYS. My Father NEVER received Holy Communion (I respected him for that decision, since he knew he was contradicting Church Teachings), but also never went to seek Reconciliation and do Penance, even after contracepting became unnecessary in their marriage (at my urging my mother did, after dad died).

So, did leaving the ethnic neighborhood where the Church was its center and embracing the education and norms of the American Society that surrounded them lead to their loss of faith?

Honestly, Lily, I don’t know.

But I see that out of an immediate family–we’re Italians, don’t forget, what we consider immediate family includes more than 60 people–there are only maybe 10 of us who regularly go to Church. And believe me, the rest make fun of us (good naturedly, of course) for “believing in that stuff.” One branch of the family became Evangelicals.
 
I’m not sure if this has been posted here before, but this is a 90 minute historical account of the changes. This guy is very fair in his assessment. And actually goes through a historical analysis that spans hundreds of years. Most notably is what questions he raises but really doesn’t have an answer for. Make some popcorn and enjoy.

Part I
youtube.com/watch?v=lxx1ZRMpfk8

Part II
youtube.com/watch?v=hzjN5Dbr0kA
 
Lily,

In the larger sense of this discussion, I don’t believe we’re talking about the world that the Immigrants came from, but the one in which they settled. America. I am second generation American on both sides of my family, all of whose roots are in Italy. If one went back about 5 generations on my maternal grandfather’s side, those roots are found in Croatia. Both of my parents have talked about the indignities they themselves and their parents and grandparents suffered because of their language and accents (my father’s, born in America, first language was a dialect of Italian, not learning English until going to school).

Both of my parents grew up in the Church, with a Catholic education. My mother was sent to Public HS, as was my father (who was the second to youngest of 16 children). As their families assimilated by “losing” their accents, and “joining” the middle class (both sides of the family were merchants in some sense–owning their own businesses, some as cobblers, some as builders), they were able to leave the “ghettoes” where they were forced to live. In the case of my father’s family, it wasn’t until the early 1970’s that many of his brothers and sisters and their families were ABLE to buy homes in different parts of town. In the case of my mother’s, it wasn’t until my grandfather built a “sub-division” in a part of Long Island that they were able have a home outside of the “Italian” section. Up until the 1970’s ethnic “neighborhoods” on Long Island were still pretty common.

Now my point is an easy one, and I am only speaking of my family’s experience here about which I’d like you to be clear. The Church was the center of the community in both my parents’ childhoods, until their families “made it.” When this happened, in both families–one family in NY, the other in Pa, they basically left the bosom of the Church. their children (me, my brothers and sisters and cousins) all received the Sacraments, but were not brought to Church or even expected to go after Confirmation. Church was treated as a tolerated necessity (more for the grandparents’ benefit).

My parents–both of whom had graduate degrees and were educators-- bought into the whole sexual revolution, but only to the extent that when they decided 5 children were enough (the fifth died in my mother’s womb at the beginning of her 8th month, at the time they did not surgically remove the dead child, but allowed the body to expel the dead child–my mother carried her dead baby in her womb for about 6 weeks until her body expelled him) they contracepted–and this was before it was ‘legal’ to buy prophylactics in NYS. My Father NEVER received Holy Communion (I respected him for that decision, since he knew he was contradicting Church Teachings), but also never went to seek Reconciliation and do Penance, even after contracepting became unnecessary in their marriage (at my urging my mother did, after dad died).

So, did leaving the ethnic neighborhood where the Church was its center and embracing the education and norms of the American Society that surrounded them lead to their loss of faith?

Honestly, Lily, I don’t know.

But I see that out of an immediate family–we’re Italians, don’t forget, what we consider immediate family includes more than 60 people–there are only maybe 10 of us who regularly go to Church. And believe me, the rest make fun of us (good naturedly, of course) for “believing in that stuff.” One branch of the family became Evangelicals.
Well, allow me to relate my own experience. Oddly enough my family are Croatian too. Relatives (although not my grandparents) on both sides of the family were the first to come out here. T

hen my parents followed - I suppose I can call them first generation. When they arrived here, there were already established Croatian communities that had been since well before WWII. These people didn’t just worship at the Catholic churches that previous generations of Irish and Italian immigrants had started - they built many of their own Croatian Catholic churches in places like Wollongong, Newcastle, Canberra and so on.

Thirty-plus years on, most have moved from steel towns and inner-city suburbs where they first settled - and guess what, NEW Croatian Catholic communities have sprung up in some of the outer more pleasant suburbs that they moved to. So to that extent the faith is alive and well among them.

In the second generation - I’d call us very well assimilated ‘Aussies’. In my family most of my generation either don’t speak Croatian or would struggle to do so.

Some of them don’t go to church as often as they might, sure. But all baptised their children, all children have thus far gone to Catholic school, and all who are of age to be communed and confirmed have been. Some of the parents are very involved in their church communities as well.

My own parents keep an eye on the grandkids’ religious education, and just at Christmas we had the beautiful experience of one of the grandchildren (all of ten years old) voluntarily joining us for Morning Prayer and reading at a lay-led Communion Service held in my parents’ remote neighbourhood. So it looks like the new generation are not lacking either.

I’m not privy to all their doings contraception-wise, but know at least one that heartily advocates NFP to whoever will listen (and doesn’t get scoffed at for it - she’s a doctor, so people tend to pay attention). And know of none that would, for example, advocate abortion. I myself am above-average devoutn-wise, but rarely get ribbed for it even by the most secular of my family members, neither do my parents who are also devout.

So no, I don’t think you can generalise about the effect of immigration or even ‘assimilation’ 🤷
 
So no, I don’t think you can generalise about the effect of immigration or even ‘assimilation’ 🤷
I don’t understand the shrug, or this particular comment. I believe I made it clear that I was speaking specifically of my family’s experience, and was not generalising "about the effect of immigration or even ‘assimilation.’ "

Are we having a conversation or arguing, Lily?

By the way, I enjoyed reading about your family’s experience, actually. It was nice to read that even the more highly educated members of your family still find themselves in the Church. In my family, it is quite the opposite.
 
Catholic Churches in American cities once regularly warned parishoners in bulletins and from the pulpit of the dangers of moving away from the parish. I remember once reading a bulletin from my mother’s parish from perhaps over 80 years ago, where the church’s priest reminded those considering moving, that it would prevent them from sharing in the church’s daily spiritual life. Nowdays, we think it’s a big thing if we’re at church 3 times a week, back then it was not uncommon to go to church twice a day, seven times a week. Life revolved around the parish, but once it no longer did, the suburbs looked better and better.
 
Vatican II was not a dogmatic council, but an attempt to “modernize” the Church. Its documents were left full of ambiguity which allowed for separate interpretation. Paul6 becomes pope and show how allows Bugnini to rewrite the Mass in conjunction with six Protestant ministers in an attempt at ecumenical dialogue.

Does that sound right?
Is that fact? Six protestant ministers were consulted when our Church leaders rewrote the Mass?!? 😦
 
Is that fact? Six protestant ministers were consulted when our Church leaders rewrote the Mass?!? 😦
You know Luther and other Protestant leaders were offered the option of participating in the Council of Trent, if I remember correctly? The only reason they didn’t is that the Emperor of the time was less tolerant than the Pope and wouldn’t have let them pass through his lands.

It’s not and has never been the Church’s habit to ignore people of other faiths and pretend they don’t exist 🤷
 
Here’s some parts of Sacrosanctum Concillium I’d like to elaborate on.
  1. The practice of placing sacred images in churches so that they may be venerated by the faithful is to be maintained. Nevertheless their number should be moderate and their relative positions should reflect right order. For otherwise they may create confusion among the Christian people and foster devotion of doubtful orthodoxy.
    Code:
        Why not just become a Protestant ?
Thanks for the quotes, Seamus. “Why not just become a protestant?” Indeed! After VII, we gutted our own parishes and rid them of “popery” like the protestants in Europe did when the power shifted hands.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top