S
samoht
Guest
Jeanie,Dear Mr. Eby -
Some thoughts from a post VII cradle Catholic in case you are interested in a different perspective. Tho first I would like to say that I really respect your love for the church and for the tradition you were raised in. The long history and tradition of the Church is one of the things I take great comfort in.
I was born in the early 60’s so my formation on the faith was right on the edge of VII. I have done no research of my own on VII but was taught that the purpose was to be more accessible to the regular people.
I would agree that we are way more casual than even some protestant churches I have been to. However, the fastest growing non-denominational church in our area stresses casual attire. I also understand that for your generation, the way you dressed was part of your worship to God - a sign of respect. But you must not presume that people in my generation are dressing the way the are out of disrespect.
I don’t care much for the more modern churches. My church has beautiful statues and architecture.
We have beautiful marble altars. I wouldn’t much care for a wooden one either.
My mother is a cradle Catholic. She attended Masses in Latin with the Homilies in Bohemian. I am very grateful that I can experience the entire Mass in a language I understand.
I think that’s a generational thing - I see nothing wrong with it at all. My mother loves it - she always wanted to be an altar server but of course, could not because she was a girl.
Guilty. Tho, in my defense - I teach CCD on Sunday mornings and this allows me to get to class early to prepare for the little darlings.
I think that is up to you. If you have alot of talking people before and during mass I can see your point. Perhaps that is something your parish priest can address?
It sounds lovely. But how was church growth at the time? Was it better or worse than now? This year, my parish has 9 catechuments and candidates we will be welcoming into the Church.
And, as others have said, I believe most of these changes were cultural, not from VII. And, in my comparatively short experience, some of it depends on your priest. Our last one was very traditional and brought back a lot of traditions (including the Angelus which I had never heard of - sad, I know). Our current one is more modern and did away with a lot of the traditional stuff.
I’ve learned to lift my heart up to God, no matter the form of the Mass or the priest involved. Christ is still there along with the whole communion of saints - it is still a beautiful thing.
God bless you.
I thank you for your intelligent response. Most of the responses I have received are in asking my questions instead of trying to logically answer mine. I am not angry about that tho some think I am. I do not get angry for it is a wasted emotion.
You speak, for example of the Angelus, and it is truly beautiful. It has been so long since I have heard it that I would love to have it come into use again. There are so many things that people have not experienced that were truly beautiful. When I was a boy I sang in a choir that was made up of men and boys and we sang all the beautiful hymns. Some in English and many in Latin. Because of the way our church was configured with very high ceilings the sound was like that of an immense choir and very beautiful. It would give one chills to hear the reverance and beautiful tones. I could still, to this day, sing all of those Latin chants and hymns with great excitement.
To me the catholic faith was more than an experience. It was a way of life that we lived every day. It was never out of our minds.
Now, to the sorrow of the times, such feeling will not be found by the current experience.
I will say again that any of my comments have nothing to do with Vatican II documents. It has to do with attitude and lack of reverance. In the church I grew up in it was just an experience entering the church. The very high ceilings had paintings like in the Sistene Chapel. They were paintings of the Angels and Jesus at the Center. You could not look up without being in awe.
The life size statues and very large stations of the Cross were every where.
All of this brought you into an atmosphere of reverence and pride.
This is not the desire of a man 72 years old to ruminate on the past. It is something that could not help but help one become reverant. And is that not what it should be?
Doing away with the traditional stuff is what it is all about. Tradition is what gives us solidarity. When I was in the military we followed tradition to the letter otherwise we would have nothing.
If you were a girl scout or a brownie you followed tradition other wise you had nothing more than a bunch of girls doing whatever they want. Tradition is the core of what man is all about.
The tradition of our county during the most destructive war during World War II was what brought us thru such terrible times. Everything is about tradition. Without it we would all just do our own thing which is what many people want to do today. That is more than wrong, it is destructivef and we will pay for it.
Jeanie, I would suggest that you find about what the tradition of the church was in the past and how it went about it’s daily life.
You seem like a sensible caring person and you can really find how great it was in the past and why I care so much about it.
You were born about the same time my daughters were born and I know you did not have a chance to see how things were but we can all learn from the past. I am a student of world history and I have learned more in my life because of it.
Againl, I really appreciate your comments and stay as you are for you are a good person.
God Bless and keep you.
Thomas Eby…