Vatican looks to heavens for signs of alien life

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stylteralmaldo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Stylteralmaldo

Guest
The article:
google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hf92aHEwYT87J1XPP4JrIusKBT-AD9BSTO1G1

My questions from the article if others here with knowledge could elaborate:
article:
Four hundred years after it locked up Galileo for challenging the view that the Earth was the center of the universe, the Vatican has called in experts to study the possibility of extraterrestrial alien life and its implication for the Catholic Church.
Is that entirely true? Does anyone have something concrete regarding the reason Galileo was “locked up”?
article:
The Church of Rome’s views have shifted radically through the centuries since Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake as a heretic in 1600 for speculating, among other ideas, that other worlds could be inhabited.
Has the Catholic Church’s views shifted radically in this regard? Who is this Giordano character and what are the “among other ideas” that are indicated here? Who burned him as a heretic? Was it the Church or secular authorities?
article:
The Roman Catholic Church’s relationship with science has come a long way since Galileo was tried as a heretic in 1633 and forced to recant his finding that the Earth revolves around the sun. Church teaching at the time placed Earth at the center of the universe.
Can someone give me more than just this quick summary that probably is missing key details?
article:
Earlier this year, the Vatican also sponsored a conference on evolution to mark the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s “The Origin of Species.”
The event snubbed proponents of alternative theories, like creationism and intelligent design, which see a higher being rather than the undirected process of natural selection behind the evolution of species.
Were these theories “snubbed” as the article indicates? The second sentence implies that the Vatican is favoring an undirected process of natural selection rather than a higher being as being behind the evolution of species by “snubbing” the other theories. Can someone please provide somthing concrete that rebuts this assertion?
 
From the CA Library, Faith Tracts, Faith & Science, Galileo;

"Anti-Catholics often cite the Galileo case as an example of the Church refusing to abandon outdated or incorrect teaching, and clinging to a “tradition.” They fail to realize that the judges who presided over Galileo’s case were not the only people who held to a geocentric view of the universe. It was the received view among scientists at the time.

Centuries earlier, Aristotle had refuted heliocentricity, and by Galileo’s time, nearly every major thinker subscribed to a geocentric view. Copernicus refrained from publishing his heliocentric theory for some time, not out of fear of censure from the Church, but out of fear of ridicule from his colleagues.

**Many people wrongly believe Galileo proved heliocentricity. He could not answer the strongest argument against it, which had been made nearly two thousand years earlier by Aristotle: If heliocentrism were true, then there would be observable parallax shifts in the stars’ positions as the earth moved in its orbit around the sun. **However, given the technology of Galileo’s time, no such shifts in their positions could be observed. It would require more sensitive measuring equipment than was available in Galileo’s day to document the existence of these shifts, given the stars’ great distance. Until then, the available evidence suggested that the stars were fixed in their positions relative to the earth, and, thus, that the earth and the stars were not moving in space—only the sun, moon, and planets were.

“**In the end, Galileo recanted his heliocentric teachings, but it was not—as is commonly supposed—under torture nor after a harsh imprisonment. Galileo was, in fact, treated surprisingly well.
**
As historian Giorgio de Santillana, who is not overly fond of the Catholic Church, noted, “We must, if anything, admire the cautiousness and legal scruples of the Roman authorities.” Galileo was offered every convenience possible to make his imprisonment in his home bearable.”

catholic.com/library/Galileo_Controversy.asp

Copernicus, who came up with the heliocentric theory, was a Catholic cleric and was never persecuted by the Church for his theory. Galileo’s ego was his problem. Although he could not prove his theory with the technology of the day, he insisted on publishing the theory as a fact. Sounds like the ‘global warming’ theory that is accepted as “scientific fact?” today!

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, Ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark
 
Although this post does not answer the aforementioned questions, I would like to ask another question that is somewhat related to the news article.

It appears that the Church is becoming more receptive to newly found scientific findings and is interested in learning more about how science affects our world. Since the Church has ammended some of their views about the world from scientific evidence (example found in the article) it seems reasonable to me that the Church may continue to evolve some of their views (I am being purposely ambiguous as to what certain views may change because science is always proving and disproving certain theories).

I am admittedly ignorant on the subject of Traditional Catholicism, but I was wondering how do Traditional Catholics view the influence of science on the Vatican? It seems to me that they are not particularly keen on the idea of “change” within the Vatican. I apologize if I posted this on the wrong thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top