G
Godfollower
Guest
It’s my understanding that, even though it may have been part of an Egyptian temple at one point, it was the ancient Romans who brought it to Rome because it was pretty (the Romans were very much into grand architecture, and they were perfectly happy to engage in huge engineering projects). Caligula had it put in the center of his Circus (I believe as a decoration). It is said to have borne silent witness to many Christian martyrdoms – possibly including that of St. Peter himself.
So building a Christian plaza around it is a form of celebration of Christianity’s triumph over paganism.
But, if it’s so bad to keep a statue that was one used as part of a temple, why do we allow the Parthenon to stand? It actually was a temple.
So building a Christian plaza around it is a form of celebration of Christianity’s triumph over paganism.
But, if it’s so bad to keep a statue that was one used as part of a temple, why do we allow the Parthenon to stand? It actually was a temple.