VaticanCatholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter MasterXploder7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MasterXploder7

Guest
One of the sites that I’ve listened to is VaticanCatholic.com it is run by two brothers that are avidly against Vatican II, so much so that they take an almost Lutheran position, saying that Vatican II is the antichrist counter church. I would assume that they would not be supported by the RCC or are they supported?

While I am especially grateful for the many mercies that Vatican II reveals to the world, I don’t want to have something like a confirmation bias. Their main points are that the Vatican II ordination process has been detrimental and therefore all masses by priests and confessions to priests under the 1968 rite are invalid and in danger of grave sin.
 
Any group that says that Vatican II started the “antichrist counter church” is obviously not going to be supported by the Catholic Church.

They’re sedevacantists and conspiracy theorists. Not worth your time. Run far and fast.

-Fr ACEGC
 
When somebody starts throwing around words like “antichrist counter church” then that’s a good sign that the person you are listening to is not in their right mind or up for a reasonable discussion, and it’s time to turn the dial.
 
Last edited:
Without looking at the link, are they the Dimond Brothers? If they are, they’re sedevacantists. They are definitely not supported and like @edward_george1 said, should be avoided.
 
edward_george1 said:
Not worth your time. Run far and fast.
Click to expand...
Amen to that. Just the OP’s brief description is enough to know that there isn’t going to be anything worthwhile to glean from the site. It’s not worth the time it would take to filter through it all and respond.
 
Not to mention that the attacks on the Pope on this site is an attack on the “Canon Law”.
 
That site refers to the Pope as the anti-Pope, promotes white nationalism, and spreads conspiracy theories (such as Sandy Hook was a hoax). Of course they aren’t supported by the Church.
 
They lost me when they call the Bishop of Rome (current) an antichrist … I still prefer to believe Jesus in Mat 16 … “And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
 
steph03 said:
They lost me when they call the Bishop of Rome (current) an antichrist … I still prefer to believe Jesus in Mat 16 … “And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
Click to expand...
While I don’t actually consider this a good reason for apostolic succession, what I do believe is a good reason for it is that the generations are taught by the previous generation which lead back to the apostles and their bishops. And with every bishop comes an expected level of mercy worthy of the office (as a member of the laity, I admit that I exalt myself more than I should; but a bishop ought to have learned mercy and grace just like Jesus offers us) this means that the teachings go to the worthy and merciful and the laity are forever thankful for the provision and providence of God.
 
I figured it was when he said two brothers who were decrying Vatican II as the anti-Christ.
 
MasterXploder7 said:
The first response used the “Fr” abbreviation and had a Batman picture, so I rolled with it for fun
Click to expand...
He’s been called that before, and he’ll be called that again. 😄

I think he also goes by “The Bat Priest”. 😜
 
Ignore them. They are voices of dissent and division. There are many such voices, just as there were in our Lord’s time.

Beware also of any individual or group calling itself a “remnant.” Same problem.

Humble submission and obedience have allowed the Church to remain solidly planted for almost 2,000 years.
 
I used to buy into his nonsense. I would stay away from divisive channels such as his. He made a good case for the Immaculate Conception, but otherwise, he’s not worth it.
 
Very few people, even among the sedevacantists I know, take the Dimond bros seriously. Don’t be like these people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top