C
CB_Catholic
Guest
If I remember correctly, having grown up in the 1950’s, women in this country did not usually wear chapel veils to church, they wore hats or scarves. And I seem to recall that it was Jackie O., in the early 60’s, who made the chapel veil popular, although she wore many beautiful hats also.
There were also lace doilies made for covering the head, and in a pinch, we would put a hanky or kleenex on our heads. But chapel veils were not the norm. It seems that people think that veiling was the norm, and those who cover their heads automatically think veils, but back then, if you were getting dressed up to go somewhere, like church, city shopping, a luncheon, etc, the outfit included a hat and gloves.
The veil (mantilla) didn’t have any particular significance, it was just a head covering, in lieu of a hat. Black and white were the most popular colors because they would go with just about anything, and in the summer white was more popular because it went better with the lighter summer clothing colors. Little girls often wore the doilies, or headbands, or little flowered and ribboned hats they got when they got their new Easter outfits. Also, most Protestant women wore hats to church also–it was just the custom and style.
Unless you were a nun or sister, the veil and the color had no significance other than a head covering, and it still doesn’t. So it seems that a new tradition has developed fairly recently about wearing a veil and the significance of colors, but it isn’t based on any American tradition that I know of, unless you were a widow, who sometimes wore black veils attached to a hat which covered their faces also.
I have nothing against mantillas, they are very portable, some are very pretty, but I just wanted to correct the notion that the traditional headcovering in this country for church was a veil, when it wasn’t. For myself, I wish hats were back in style, people seemed to dress better for church back then and there were so many pretty hats. But I guess I"m showing my age
.
There were also lace doilies made for covering the head, and in a pinch, we would put a hanky or kleenex on our heads. But chapel veils were not the norm. It seems that people think that veiling was the norm, and those who cover their heads automatically think veils, but back then, if you were getting dressed up to go somewhere, like church, city shopping, a luncheon, etc, the outfit included a hat and gloves.
The veil (mantilla) didn’t have any particular significance, it was just a head covering, in lieu of a hat. Black and white were the most popular colors because they would go with just about anything, and in the summer white was more popular because it went better with the lighter summer clothing colors. Little girls often wore the doilies, or headbands, or little flowered and ribboned hats they got when they got their new Easter outfits. Also, most Protestant women wore hats to church also–it was just the custom and style.
Unless you were a nun or sister, the veil and the color had no significance other than a head covering, and it still doesn’t. So it seems that a new tradition has developed fairly recently about wearing a veil and the significance of colors, but it isn’t based on any American tradition that I know of, unless you were a widow, who sometimes wore black veils attached to a hat which covered their faces also.
I have nothing against mantillas, they are very portable, some are very pretty, but I just wanted to correct the notion that the traditional headcovering in this country for church was a veil, when it wasn’t. For myself, I wish hats were back in style, people seemed to dress better for church back then and there were so many pretty hats. But I guess I"m showing my age