A
ATeutonicKnight
Guest
I’m debating two Protestants that want a verse stating that not all sins are equal. The one about the unforgivable sin of sinning against the Holy Spirit does not work.
I’m debating two Protestants that want a verse stating that not all sins are equal. The one about the unforgivable sin of sinning against the Holy Spirit does not work.
:doh2:How about Mark 3:28-30?
“Amen, I say to you, all sins and all blasphemies that people utter will be forgiven them. But whoever blasphemes against the holy Spirit will never have forgiveness, but is guilty of an everlasting sin.”
…OH!:doh2:
LOL… but seriously – why does this one “not work” for the purposes of your discussion? Just curious…
His theory is that this isn’t a sin, it’s a blaspheme. Denying Jesus is a blaspheme against the Holy Spirit.:doh2:
LOL… but seriously – why does this one “not work” for the purposes of your discussion? Just curious…
OK. But… erm… blasphemy isn’t a sin?His theory is that this isn’t a sin, it’s a blaspheme. Denying Jesus is a blaspheme against the Holy Spirit.
No. Because if it doesn’t directly say sin, then it’s not one.OK. But… erm… blasphemy isn’t a sin?![]()
It says that Blasphemy is a sin.No. Because if it doesn’t directly say sin, then it’s not one.
You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, You fool!’ shall be liable to the** hell of fire**.” (Matthew 5:19-22)\I actually found this verse before, and I thought it would be perfect, so I used it, and guess what? He gave me a ridiculous argument on why this didn’t prove my point. It’s like talking to a wall, really. He’s one of those guys that believes Jesus hates Religion, and that he abolished it.“You would have no power over me unless it had been given you from above; therefore he who delivered me to you has the greater sin.” (John 19:11)
"Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.“You have heard that it was said to the men of old,You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says,You fool!’ shall be liable to the** hell of fire**.” (Matthew 5:19-22)\
Here we see Jesus making a distinction between grave matter and not so grave matter. So the one who disobeys the least of the commandments, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but the point is he shall still be in the kingdom of heaven!! However, those who commit grave offenses, such as calling one’s brother a “fool” shall not be in the kingdom of heaven but they shall be liable to the hell of fire.
Typical response!! You might want to see something similar that recently happened with me, here.I actually found this verse before, and I thought it would be perfect, so I used it, and guess what? He gave me a ridiculous argument on why this didn’t prove my point. It’s like talking to a wall, really. He’s one of those guys that believes Jesus hates Religion, and that he abolished it.