Very confused about differences in Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter rabbysmom
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Really? I had no idea. The churches I attend are nowhere near my home. I don’t like the ones near my house. I hope that’s not going to be a problem.
Besides the parish boundaries issue, you may also want to consider distance strictly from a convenience point of view. If the parish you choose is far away it will be difficult for you to be very involved there other than Mass. For things like adoration, special liturgies, CCD or parish school, etc. you may find a closer parish easier as so eventually end up attending there anyway.
 
Go where you feel most comfortable. The actual Mass is the exact same. Hand holding or extension of hands is merely the way some people feel more comfortable praying. Don’t be fearful of it…as some on this forum are; but if you don’t feel comfortable watching it, then go elsewhere.
No one on this forum are afraid of hand holding/extension. It is wrong, it is not part of our Catholic faith it is something that has been copied from new age and some of the newer protestant sects, primarily the Pentecostals and the Charismatics, not from Rome.

The people who engage in it are engaging in a spirit of rebellion and damage the unity of the Church which is displayed most clearly by the OP starting this thread.

These things ultimately comes from the devil.
 
Que cheesy announcer voice: As seen on TV.😃

Is EWTN really the definitive answer to correctness in the Church? 🤷
No Rome is, the Mass on EWTN is in accordance with the practice of Rome. I would have said to watch a Mass in Rome but they are shown on tv a lot less regularly and I doubt the OP is going to go book herself a flight there anytime soon.

But I am sure you already knew that.

Do you like to hold hands by any chance?

See how trying to force hand holding is dividing people? You are been passive aggressive with me as a result of this issue, this is not how people who share one faith are supposed to act, are we not brothers?
 
The only time that it may be a problem is if you decide to get married, have your children baptized, or have to make funeral arrangements. One of my friends goes to one parish and has never stepped foot in his home parish. He’s not registered at either. He approached the Pastor of the parish he attends for marriage counseling and the Pastor told him that there was no registration on record for him. When my friend explained the situation to the Pastor, he was told to ask his home parish Pastor for a letter giving him permission to seek marriage counseling with him as a sign of respect and courtesy to the home parish (his home parish Pastor wrote the letter immediately).

It’s also happened with funerals in the area too.

Some dioceses don’t really pay attention to the boundary thing. Mine does, so that’s why I try to tell people about it. 🤷
There is also the issue of “personal parishes” - parishes established by the bishop for persons of some particular group.

Examples include a parish for the Hispanic community in an otherwise non-hispanic area, or for Poles, or persons of a different church sui iuris under the bishop’s care (usually, in the US, these are in separate overlapping dioceses, often called eparchies).

In Anchorage, for example…

Our Lady of Guadalupe is a non-territorial parish. It was erected specifically for the Hispanic Community. Anyone of hispanic descent can, by registering there, be properly cared for by the pastor without reference to the territorial pastor.

Holy Family Cathedral is also designated as a personal parish… for any Catholic of the Roman Church who wishes to enroll there. There are parishioners who drive 80 miles to attend there, as for one reason or another, they don’t want to be enrolled at their local parish. It also used to be the Filipino personal parish, with a Tagalog mass every other week.

St Anthony hosts a quasi-parish for the Korean Community as a personal parish. They have mass in Korean, and all who speak Korean are eligible to register there.

St Nicholas of Myra is dually constituted; it’s a parish of the Eparchy of Holy Protection of Mary of Phoenix, and thus a Ruthenian Parish. It is the territorial parish of all Ruthenians in Alaska. By tradition, since there is no Ukrainian parish, it also is the territorial parish of the Ukrainian Church Catholics in Alaska. It also is constituted as a personal parish for Roman Catholics attracted to the Byzantine Rite, so they may elect to enroll there. Further, by agreement between the eparchy and the Archdiocese, it’s also ascribed the canonical care of all members of other churches in union, even tho’ non-byzantines would canonically fall to the local territorial bishop of the dominant rite.

In dioceses with large urban areas with diverse and scattered ethnic groups, such non-territorial (Such as OLoG or Holy Family Cathedral in Anchorage) or semi-territorial (Such as St Anthony in Anchorage) parishes allow for retaining that social and ethnic connection that the old system of ethnic neghborhoods and ghettos used to enforce… without the ghetto.

Many dioceses simply give up, and allow choice of parish in general, as it reduces confusion.
 
The Mass Order should be something like this (Ordinary Form sunday mass, because it is the ordinary form?):

(stand)
Introit / Entrance Hymn
"In the name of the father… I confess … "
Kyrie / Lord have mercy
Gloria
Congregational prayer (“Let us pray”) (…)
It should be noted that the postures given in this post may well be correct where the poster lives but are not correct for the USA.

Also, there are choices in the Introductory Rites: the Confiteor (“I confess”…) listed above is just one of three options.
 
Que cheesy announcer voice: As seen on TV.😃

Is EWTN really the definitive answer to correctness in the Church? 🤷
Certainly not, but they always follow the norms and rubrics, so their liturgy is very “trustworthy”. You know it will always be celebrated well, according to the books, and reverently on EWTN, and if you see something that appears out of the ordinary, there’s probably a good reason for it.
 
Go where you feel most comfortable. The actual Mass is the exact same. Hand holding or extension of hands is merely the way some people feel more comfortable praying. Don’t be fearful of it…as some on this forum are; but if you don’t feel comfortable watching it, then go elsewhere.
I have to disagree with this. The Mass is not about making us feel comfortable. It is about worshiping God. If the priest is being disobedient, or people are adding things to the Mass, such as hand holding, or even if the Mass isn’t very reverent, I would not go to that parish, because they are being disobedient.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top