very interesting

  • Thread starter Thread starter boog123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is interesting. At least the Muslims can back up their terrorist acts with the actual teachings of Islam. What’s even more interesting is the author of this peace has no idea what the verse he cited at the end means. The “sword” Jesus brings represents the hostility he is warning will be directed at Christians in the future. Case in point, this article. :rolleyes:
 
Not very interesting, actually.

It’s the same old same old that we hear here every single day.

People who are “annoyed” because evil exists, yet won’t follow the one thing that explains and minimizes that evil, are constantly venting their self-imposed frustrations in the media,… and in here.

All that can be done is to feel sorry for them, pray for them, and for us, that their various “idolatries of self” don’t impact the good people of the planet any harder than is absolutely necessary.
 
It is interesting. At least the Muslims can back up their terrorist acts with the actual teachings of Islam. What’s even more interesting is the author of this peace has no idea what the verse he cited at the end means. The “sword” Jesus brings represents the hostility he is warning will be directed at Christians in the future. Case in point, this article. :rolleyes:
and again it all comes back to ISLAM, i just won some money
 
and again it all comes back to ISLAM, i just won some money
Troll much? What exactly do you find interesting about a twelve year old anti-christian editorial? Why are you surprised that Islam is discussed when the link you posted mentions it twice in the first sentence?
 
and again it all comes back to ISLAM, i just won some money
Jestocost is right, the article that YOU posted mentions Islam first, and now you think it inappropriate that I mention Islam myself. What a hypocrite. Next time try to collect your thoughts before you reply.
 
Troll much? What exactly do you find interesting about a twelve year old anti-christian editorial? Why are you surprised that Islam is discussed when the link you posted mentions it twice in the first sentence?
cause it’s still going on, and i’m not suprised of the talk of islam, just not the talk on catholicism because every major religion has it’s many bad apples, why just because i posted this link i’m attacking catholics, just trying to even thing out.
 
cause it’s still going on, and i’m not suprised of the talk of islam, just not the talk on catholicism because every major religion has it’s many bad apples, why just because i posted this link i’m attacking catholics, just trying to even thing out.
It’s simple - look at what the religion teaches, rather than what a certain follower of that religion does. Trying to “even things out” by guilting yourself into attacking all religions equally is pointless.
 
The article linked by the OP is ridiculous. It states that Timothy McVey was a Catholic. The fact was that McVey repudiated Catholicism in particular and Christianity in general while he was in the army, many years before the OK bombing. McVey did not consider himself a Catholic.

By contrast, Islamic terrorists do their evil in the name of Allah and Mohamed. The McVey types make no such religious claims and in fact do their evil for purely secular reasons.

It is a common liberal tactic of deceit to conflate unrelated things in order to draw spurious conclusions.

Paul
 
It’s simple - look at what the religion teaches, rather than what a certain follower of that religion does. Trying to “even things out” by attacking all religions equally is pointless.
but why attack it, what good is it going to do
 
The article linked by the OP is ridiculous. It states that Timothy McVey was a Catholic. The fact was that McVey repudiated Catholicism in particular and Christianity in general while he was in the army, many years before the OK bombing. McVey did not consider himself a Catholic.

By contrast, Islamic terrorists do their evil in the name of Allah and Mohamed. The McVey types make no such religious claims and in fact do their evil for purely secular reasons.

It is a common liberal tactic of deceit to conflate unrelated things in order to draw spurious conclusions.

Paul
see, now a Muslim can make an argument like that if he wanted to, we can go back and forth for hours, would not change a thing
 
cause it’s still going on, and i’m not suprised of the talk of islam, just not the talk on catholicism because every major religion has it’s many bad apples, why just because i posted this link i’m attacking catholics, just trying to even thing out.
What’s still going on? Islamic terrorism, Anti-christian bigotry from the ffrf, or your trolling?
 
What’s still going on? Islamic terrorism, Anti-christian bigotry from the ffrf, or your trolling?
both
i don’t want to argue, like u i want to make a point, people can talk about islam but not catholics, that would be just wrong right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top