Victim Souls - Traditional teaching?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iona_scribe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

iona_scribe

Guest
I can’t remember where I first heard the term “victim soul,” but I began to look into the concept recently and I’m struggling with it.

Definition from Catholic Culture: catholicculture.org/culture/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=37098
“A person specially chosen by God to suffer more than most people during life, and who generously accepts the suffering in union with the Savior and after the example of Christ’s own Passion and Death. The motive of a victim soul is a great love of God and the desire to make reparation for the sins of mankind.”

Okay, fine, there are plenty of saints who had the stigmata, and we are all called to take up our cross and offer up our struggles and suffering in union with Christ’s sacrifice to make reparation for sins, etc.

But when I probe further, a Google search of the term turns up pages like this:
stgemmagalgani.com/2009/07/co-redeemers-with-christ-victim-souls.html
faithofthefatherssaints.blogspot.com/2006/03/sister-josefa-menendez-victim-soul.html
tldm.org/directives/d202.htm
commonwealmagazine.org/blog/?p=797
There seems to be this idea that God the Father is boiling over with wrath (which is termed “justice”) and he’s only seconds away from unleashing it on the world unless he gets appeased by the horrific suffering of a special class of people who act as co-victims with Christ.

From the first webpage on St. Gemma Galgani, Jesus says in a vision:
"My child, I have need of victims; strong victims, in order to appease the just anger of my Divine Father. I need souls who, by their sufferings, trials and sacrifices, make amends for sinners and for their ingratitude. Oh, if I could make all understand how angry My Father is by the impious world!”

From the second webpage on Sister Josefa Menendez, Jesus says to her:
“My justice will be restrained as long as I find victims who will make reparation.”
“Alas! The world offends Me, but it will be saved by the reparation of My chosen souls.”

The third webpage looks like it has something to do with the very not-Church-approved Bayside apparitions.

And the fourth is part of an article in Commonweal Magazine which implies that this particular concept of the “victim soul” didn’t exist in Catholicism prior to Vatican II.

I guess my question is, where did this concept come from, and is it part of Traditional Catholic spirituality or no?

I’ll admit to being a convert from Protestantism, so sometimes it feels like I’m missing a Catholic gene somewhere. But I was drawn to the Church partly because I was disillusioned with the “health and wealth gospel” of the Pentecostal church I had attended in college, but mostly because I found refuge in Christ’s passion…I found out that I could unite my suffering to His as an offering to God, and therefore all my trials had meaning and brought me closer to God.

My formation in RCIA was pretty decent, but I’ve had to supplement it from other sources. I was surprised to discover from the Baltimore Catechism that the Traditional Catholic theology surrounding Jesus’ sacrifice is that it is a perfect offering to God the Father, and that the Father is more pleased with that perfect offering than He is offended by our sins and thus His wrath is turned away. This is much different than the Protestant concept that I previously believed in which is something more like “God’s wrath at our sins can only be appeased if He gets to punish someone for it, and so Jesus takes on our punishment.”

So the problem I have with the “victim soul” concept is that it is presented in Traditional terms…making an offering to God to turn away His wrath/justice, suffering in union with Christ, etc. But with the underlying theology seeming kind of Protestant. St. So-and-so suffers the punishment from God that’s due to some sinners. Only it seems weirder to me because it’s not even really Jesus recieving the punishment, it’s more like the penalty is too much so Jesus needs a small band of very holy people to endure some of the punishment for Him and that somehow this mysteriously saves souls.

Also, I just don’t think of God at being so very angry all the time. I’m familiar with the loving Father from the parable of the Prodigal Son, where he patiently lets the younger son leave and gives him enough rope to hang himself with, so to speak, and then welcomes him back with a loving embrace when he repents. He doesn’t beat the faithful elder son for what the younger son did.

Probably the main reason I’m inquiring about this is that a dear friend of mine is undergoing a tremendous number of health problems which cause constant pain and have effected every other aspect of her life. I know that God can use all suffering for a purpose, and I want to encourage her in her faith. But reading this “victim soul” stuff, it seems like such dire suffering would only serve the very cruel purposes of a wrathful God.

Sorry for such a long post. I’m really hoping that my misconceptions will be corrected and any error on my part or on the part of the sources I’ve cited will be corrected. Thank you!
 
Justice is good.

Punishment is part of justice, so punishment is good.

Everytime God punishes someone you should be on God’s side, rather than reacting against it. This society raises people to hate all punishment, it’s the error of the spirit of the age that has to be corrected. Not a good spirit.

It takes some emotional conversion for some to realize this. When you realize it, you realize taking the punishment due someone else upon yourself is good, because you bear what someone else has difficulty bearing and become more Christlike, which is rewarded in Heaven.

‘Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh, for his body, which is the church:’

Colossians 1:24

In Heaven the saints approve of justice:

“That the saints may enjoy their beatitude and the grace of God more richly, a perfect sight of the punishment of the damned is granted them.”

St. Thomas Aquinas

In purgatory the holy souls approve of the justice due themselves:

‘The same fire torments the damned in hell and the just in purgatory…The least pain in purgatory exceeds the greatest in this life.’

St. Thomas Aquinas

Sin deserves justice because it is so grievous and great. We learn how much it deserves it by loving God. The more we love God the more we hate the least sin against Him. By this method we learn how just and good justice itself is, and approve of it.

St. Anselm of Canterbury’s book ‘Why God Became Man’ explains justice very well.

The scriptures are full of Justice. When we love God’s justice for the sake of love of Him, they are all read in a new light – The Old Testament, Revelation… the warnings of Christ ‘Repent!’… And why Christ suffers…

And why we love to suffer -in- Him… and -with- Him. 🙂
 
God is outraged by the sins of the world and the perfect sacrifice of Christ (on the Cross and in the Mass) is truly a sacrifice of propitiation as well as of praise, adoration and thanksgiving. That said St. Paul says we are to make up for what is wanting in Christ’s sacrifice (Col 1:24). What is wanting in Christ’s sacrifice is our participation. As Christ said to take up our cross daily and follow Him. The Baltimore Catechism teaches (based upon scripture) that suffering perfects love [charity] and increases it. The problem is most of society refuses to carry it’s cross and shuns suffering when Christ has revealed that suffering has redemptive and reparative value. By the suffering, prayers, and alms of victim souls many souls are ‘bought’ and converted to the faith through charity and the redemptive power of their suffering offered in union with Christ’s suffering.

I think the Catechism of the Council of Trent has a good chapter on this. I can’t point it out now and I’m not sure if it’s online or not (but I know I read it somewhere not too long ago) that penance via prayers, suffering (self inflicted as in mortification of the senses or passive as in suffering through physical evils such as sickness) can win for us actual grace but not just for ourselves. We can also offer this on behalf of others and win for them sanctifying grace (conversion). This has to do with the doctrine of the Communion of Saints.

Our Lady of Fatima, in our own age, has reminded us of this fundamental truth of the faith when she told us to pray and do penance for the conversion of sinners. The three children of Fatima are perfect examples of victim souls who offered themselves up for the conversion of sinners.
 
Thanks for discussing this with me, Shin!
Justice is good.

Punishment is part of justice, so punishment is good.

Everytime God punishes someone you should be on God’s side, rather than reacting against it. This society raises people to hate all punishment, it’s the error of the spirit of the age that has to be corrected. Not a good spirit.
I agree; definitely.
It takes some emotional conversion for some to realize this. When you realize it, you realize taking the punishment due someone else upon yourself is good, because you bear what someone else has difficulty bearing and become more Christlike, which is rewarded in Heaven.
I think this is where some subtle theological distinctions need to be made. I’m glad you brought up St. Anselm. I need to read his book for myself (thanks for the link!) but my understanding of what he taught is more or less summarized in this article on atonement theology: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisfaction_theory_of_atonement

Basically, our sins dishonor God greatly. We owe God a debt of honor. Jesus pays this debt for us by making an offering of himself which is perfectly honoring to God, and thus God withholds his righteous anger.

St. Thomas Aquinas says this in different language…he uses the word punishment, but he makes a distinction between “satisfactory” punishment and “penal” punishment.
“If we speak of that satisfactory punishment, which one takes upon oneself voluntarily, one may bear another’s punishment…. If, however, we speak of punishment inflicted on account of sin, inasmuch as it is penal, then each one is punished for his own sin only, because the sinful act is something personal. But if we speak of a punishment that is medicinal, in this way it does happen that one is punished for another’s sin.” -St. Thomas Aquinas
Basically, Jesus’ sacrifice pays for our sins by winning merit for us…
“Consequently Christ by His Passion merited salvation, not only for Himself, but likewise for all His members,”[12] and that the atonement consisted in Christ’s giving to God more “than was required to compensate for the offense of the whole human race.”
And by our acts of penance, prayer, reparation, mortification, offering our suffering, etc. we can gain merit that pleases and honors God and ask that those graces be given to forgive the sins of others or convert the hearts of sinners, etc.

The concept of “Penal Substitution” is from Calvin…the idea that Jesus paid for our sins by bearing our direct legal punishment (death). He wanted a way to describe what Jesus did on the cross that got rid of the Catholic concept of merit.

The problem is, giving someone the “penal” or legal punishment that is due to someone else is not only impossible according to St. Thomas Aquinas, it is unjust.

Here, this Catholic blog is where I first learned of the distinction between these two ways of conceptualizing Christ’s atonement: unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.com/2007/07/why-do-so-many-catholics-believe-in.html

In Calvin’s theory, God’s anger is not withheld, it’s just redirected onto an innocent party. And if the penalty has been paid in a legal sense, as protestants assert, then there is no need for a continual propitiatory offering, no need for penance, no need to gain merit or win graces, no need for purgatory, and all of that Catholic stuff 😉

What I’m getting at here, is that in some of the literature floating around on the web about victim souls, there seems to be some sort of residual Jansenism. You know, that heresy where Calvinism influenced some corners of the Church?

What I mean is this…the theology behind the concept of victim soul is solid, especially the way RosaryCrusader here just described it…but some expressions of it by some parties seems really off. On some of those webpages I cited earlier, I see things that are very Calvinistic; a fixation on the total depravity of man and the wrath of God, and the construction of some kind of economy of suffering and direct penal punishment instead of the economy of merit and graces.

I guess it boils down to one of two approaches:
“I’m suffering x illness because God is angry and needs to inflict punishment on someone and it’s such an awful punishment that Jesus needs my help to bear it.”
or…
“I’m suffering x illness, but I can offer it to God in union with Christ’s offering, and God will be so honored and pleased with this offering that he will grant grace to a sinner and withhold his righteous anger from them.”

The first way sounds kind of insane, but the second way of picturing it makes much more sense and is theologically sound. Maybe I’m answering my own question here. I won’t throw out the baby with the bathwater…I can accept the concept of victim souls, but I will reject unhealthy theological distortions of the concept.
 
God is outraged by the sins of the world and the perfect sacrifice of Christ (on the Cross and in the Mass) is truly a sacrifice of propitiation as well as of praise, adoration and thanksgiving. That said St. Paul says we are to make up for what is wanting in Christ’s sacrifice (Col 1:24). What is wanting in Christ’s sacrifice is our participation. As Christ said to take up our cross daily and follow Him.
…penance via prayers, suffering (self inflicted as in mortification of the senses or passive as in suffering through physical evils such as sickness) can win for us actual grace but not just for ourselves. We can also offer this on behalf of others and win for them sanctifying grace (conversion). This has to do with the doctrine of the Communion of Saints.
Thank you, this is a beautiful explanation!
 
Hmm, the distinctions in that link bear for a lot of thought! Interesting! Thank you!

Have you read St. Anselm yet? It is great reading!
 
Hmm, the distinctions in that link bear for a lot of thought! Interesting! Thank you!

Have you read St. Anselm yet? It is great reading!
Thank you too! I just started reading it today. Fascinating 🙂 I had heard it summarized that the difference between St. Anselm’s and Calvin’s theology is that Anselm says that Christ was obedient to God where we should have obeyed, while Calvin says that Christ was punished where we should have been punished. And here Anselm makes the case himself…
CHAPTER IX
How it was of his own accord that he died, and what this means: "he was made obedient even unto death; " and: “for which cause God hath highly exalted him;” and: "I came not to do my own will; " and: “he spared not his own Son;” and: “not as I will, but as thou wilt.”
Anselm. It seems to me that you do not rightly understand the difference between what he did at the demand of obedience, and what he suffered, not demanded by obedience, but inflicted on him, because he kept his obedience perfect.
Boso. I need to have you explain it more clearly.
Anselm. Why did the Jews persecute him even unto death?
Boso. For nothing else, but that, in word and in life, he invariably maintained truth and justice.
Anselm. I believe that God demands this of every rational being, and every being owes this in obedience to God.
Boso. We ought to acknowledge this.
Anselm. That man, therefore, owed this obedience to God the Father, humanity to Deity; and the Father claimed it from him.
Boso. There is no doubt of this.
Anselm. Now you see what he did, under the demand of obedience.
Boso. Very true, and I see also what infliction he endured, because he stood firm in obedience. For death was inflicted on him for his perseverance in obedience and he endured it; but I do not understand how it is that obedience did not demand this.
Anselm. Ought man to suffer death, if he had never sinned, or should God demand this of him?
Boso. It is on this account that we believe that man would not have been subject to death, and that God would not have exacted this of him; but I should like to hear the reason of the thing from you.
Anselm. You acknowledge that the intelligent creature was made holy, and for this purpose, viz., to be happy in the enjoyment of God.
Boso. Yes.
Anselm. You surely will not think it proper for God to make his creature miserable without fault, when he had created him holy that he might enjoy a state of blessedness. For it would be a miserable thing for man to die against his will.
Boso. It is plain that, if man had not sinned, God ought not to compel him to die.
Anselm. God did not, therefore, compel Christ to die; but he suffered death of his own will, not yielding up his life as an act of obedience, but on account of his obedience in maintaining holiness; for he held out so firmly in this obedience that he met death on account of it. It may, indeed be said, that the Father commanded him to die, when he enjoined that upon him on account of which he met death. It was in this sense, then, that “as the Father gave him the commandment, so he did, and the cup which He gave to him, he drank; and he was made obedient to the Father, even unto death;” and thus “he learned obedience from the things which he suffered,” that is, how far obedience should be maintained…
This seems to say that it’s not that the Father inflicted suffering and death on His Son, or even that He commanded Jesus to suffer and die. God commanded Christ to be obedient, and Christ chose to be perfectly obedient, even though it caused him to be persecuted and killed.

It’s a comforting thought…God isn’t the one heaping suffering onto us, but he does allow us to suffer that we may learn perfect obedience to Him through it.
 
yes, it’s traditional teaching 🙂

I don’t understand it entirely, but I don’t know God’s ways… I don’t think it’s like Him inflicting punishment on someone else, but someone offering themselves as a sacrifice for another, which is an act of love, and He shows them mercy. Love includes suffering and they suffer in union with Christ.
 
We must always remember that God is infinite, eternal and perfect love, that justice and mercy are attributes of love; justice requires giving and receiving that which one is due, mercy ameliorates (reduces or eliminates) negative consequences due to justice. Mercy, therefore, trumps justice. Jesus’ suffering first and foremost was an act of ultimate love for His Father. He accepted and obeyed completely His Father’s request to take on the sins of the world and make reparation for them. Making reparation for one’s own sins is an act of both love and justice due to God; it is an act of love because it is in obedience to God, it is an act of justice because reparation is owed to God. Making reparation for the sins of another, in unon with Christ, is an act of love and of mercy; it is an act of love both for God and for one’s neighbor. It is an act of love for God in that it demonstrates our desire to please God by honoring Him. It is an act of love toward one’s neighbor because we give of ourselves for the ultimate good of our neighbor. It is an act of mercy toward our neighbor because we take upon ourselves the just penalties due to another. By making such acts of love, justice and mercy for love of God we follow more closely in the footsteps of Jesus in union with whom we make our sacrifices.

The concept of a victim soul is not that of appeasing an angry and wrathful God. Rather, it is the concept of giving of oneself in love for the benefit of another for love of God. An analogy may be found in human terms alone. We say that a member of the military who dies in battle has made the ultimate sacrifice, the giving of one’s life. This sacrifice was willingly and voluntarily made, presumably, out of love for one’s country and, therefore, for one’s fellow citizens and for the good of the country and its people. This is the spirit behind the concept of victim souls. In a very real sense to some degree all of us are or can be victim souls. However, those who are especially chosen by God receive and accept more, sometimes continuous, opportunities of suffering on behalf of others. The more often and the more thoroughly one offers all of their sufferings in union with those of Jesus for the sake of others, the more one is a victim soul. One does not need to receive the stigmata in order to be a victim soul. Once some time ago my spiritual director said he had become convinced that I was a victim soul (a statement of which I made light by responding that I thought the suffering I bear was probably more as penance for my countless sins).

At least this is my understanding of the concept of victim souls. But there is one more aspect that I believe needs to be clarified. The protestant view appears to be that the passion of Jesus brought about the forgiveness of all our sins and with that forgiveness the waiving of the penalties due to sin. Thus, in the protestant view, there is no need for purgatory. However, I would remind us that when, at the Last Supper, Jesus consecrated the first Eucharist He said that the His blood would be shed that sins might be forgiven. He said nothing about shedding His blood so that penalties or punishment would be removed. Additionally, we need to understand that the temporal penalties due to sin have the purpose not of appeasing God’s wrath, but of purifying us by purging from us all taint of sin and sinfulness. It is, in efect, a process of sterilization so that we can enter the “clean room” of God’s presence without contaminating it for in the presence of God His holiness and sinfulness cannot coexist, the two are as differenct and incompatible as day and night. It is from this purging of sinfulness that purgatory gets its name and is the difference between hell and purgatory. The former is true and pure punishment. The latter is purification. However, this purification can take place now (in this life) or in purgatory after death. The voluntary suffering that we take on in unin with Christ for the sake of others aids in the purification process wherever it occurs. The merits we earn through our suffering are applied to those for whom we suffer.

In the Peace of Christ,
Brother Martin
 
Jesus Christ suffered for your sins,he does not ask that you suffer for the sins of others.I don^t recall the apostles doing this & private revellations are a risky business marred with imagination & pathological self delusion.St Gemm rolled around in thorns & beat herself till she bled—this is insanity,not pleasing to God.Private revellations approved are not garanteed to be authentic & the truth of the facts are not garanteed.Catherine of sienna claimed Mary appeared to her & said to her was not immaculately concieved,Faustina claimed the Eucharist flew out of the tabernacle 3x towards her like some aeroplane &Mary magaret who claimed sacred heart revellations licked vomit & ate feces once thinking it was good as a penance.Stay away from things that will effect your mental health.Look at all the souls who Christ healed in the gospel & answered prayer from the psalms by David. Having said that we are called to do penance(healthy penance) for ourselves & others.Mass,devotions to precious blood,almsgiving,prayers etc in the spirit of love for God & others. Stay away from medieval theology or superstition
 
Hi 🙂

I’m a convert from Protestantism also and it took me a bit of time to get around this theology as well but I think that it’s nothing new. After all, St Gemma is pre-VII, so is Sr Josefa Menendez 🙂 I have “Way of Divine Love” and I’ve read about St Gemma so I see where you’re getting the quotes about victim souls.

I think that victim souls relate to what you said about the traditional understanding of Christ’s Passion. It’s actually similar and I don’t think the private revelations/quotes etc about victim souls say that God is not merciful. If we read more about Sr Josefa Menendez’ writings and St Gemma, we can VERY clearly see that God is loving and merciful. How does this relate to victim souls… it might help to mention something from St Faustina’s “Divine Mercy in My Soul”… Jesus said that God is both Just and Merciful. His Mercy is His greatest attribute and He wishes to show us Mercy. But if we reject His Mercy…all we are left with is His Justice. So - relating these ideas to victim souls - if people are about to experience His Justice, it can help to offer our suffering for them so God would show them His Mercy, because our suffering united to Christ is helpful to others. It’s God’s will in terms of how we can help other souls and how our suffering can be of value IF it’s with Christ’s suffering… it’s because of Him that suffering can have any value at all. In Divine Mercy in My Soul, St Faustina interceded for a city that God was about to punish, and God spared it. She prayed the Divine Mercy chaplet. 🙂

I think maybe the difficult part here is the idea of God punishing, etc. I think this relates to His Justice. It does not mean AT ALL that God is not loving. God is loving and merciful… but He is also Just, and if we reject His Mercy, we have only Justice left. If someone is about to be shown God’s justice, we can intercede for them, and victim souls offer their suffering so that God would show people His Mercy. If God were not merciful there would not be ANY victim souls!!! that’s something to consider 🙂 it’s in His Mercy that this is possible in the first place. He uses people to help others, and suffering has value, hence: victim souls.

I hope that makes sense! God bless!
 
Justice is good.

Punishment is part of justice, so punishment is good.

Everytime God punishes someone you should be on God’s side, rather than reacting against it. This society raises people to hate all punishment, it’s the error of the spirit of the age that has to be corrected. Not a good spirit.

It takes some emotional conversion for some to realize this. When you realize it, you realize taking the punishment due someone else upon yourself is good, because you bear what someone else has difficulty bearing and become more Christlike, which is rewarded in Heaven.

‘Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh, for his body, which is the church:’

Colossians 1:24

In Heaven the saints approve of justice:

“That the saints may enjoy their beatitude and the grace of God more richly, a perfect sight of the punishment of the damned is granted them.”

St. Thomas Aquinas

In purgatory the holy souls approve of the justice due themselves:

‘The same fire torments the damned in hell and the just in purgatory…The least pain in purgatory exceeds the greatest in this life.’

St. Thomas Aquinas

Sin deserves justice because it is so grievous and great. We learn how much it deserves it by loving God. The more we love God the more we hate the least sin against Him. By this method we learn how just and good justice itself is, and approve of it.

St. Anselm of Canterbury’s book ‘Why God Became Man’ explains justice very well.

The scriptures are full of Justice. When we love God’s justice for the sake of love of Him, they are all read in a new light – The Old Testament, Revelation… the warnings of Christ ‘Repent!’… And why Christ suffers…

And why we love to suffer -in- Him… and -with- Him. 🙂
I agree that God’s justice is Holy, because God is Holy. I would also add though, that in writings like those of St Faustina, and also Sr Josefa’s writings, as well as those of the Saints, it’s very clear that God desires to show Mercy. Often, for another person to experience God’s Mercy, He might choose a victim soul who would freely offer themselves to experience God’s Justice on the others’ behalf: as you said 🙂 my point is that God’s Justice does not mean that God hates anyone, - and this would be a misunderstanding. (of course I’m not saying that you think so, but I’m replying to anyone struggling with the idea). It’s simply because God is Just. And the whole idea of victim souls shows that God is both Just and Merciful and that He rejoices in showing us His Mercy. 🙂 He wants some people to suffer for others just so that these others would come to Him. This is just my understanding of the matter…
 
I agree that God’s justice is Holy, because God is Holy. I would also add though, that in writings like those of St Faustina, and also Sr Josefa’s writings, as well as those of the Saints, it’s very clear that God desires to show Mercy. Often, for another person to experience God’s Mercy, He might choose a victim soul who would freely offer themselves to experience God’s Justice on the others’ behalf: as you said 🙂 my point is that God’s Justice does not mean that God hates anyone, - and this would be a misunderstanding. (of course I’m not saying that you think so, but I’m replying to anyone struggling with the idea). It’s simply because God is Just. And the whole idea of victim souls shows that God is both Just and Merciful and that He rejoices in showing us His Mercy. 🙂 He wants some people to suffer for others just so that these others would come to Him. This is just my understanding of the matter…
👍

viarosa.com/VR/StRose/Lima.html
From the Writings of Saint Rose of Lima:
“If only mortals would learn how great it is to possess divine grace, how beautiful, how noble, how precious. How many riches it hides within itself, how many joys and delights! No one would complain about his cross or about troubles that may happen to him, if he would come to know the scales on which they are weighed when they are distributed to men.”
“Lord, increase my sufferings, and with them increase Your love in my heart.”
“Apart from the cross there is no other ladder by which we may get to heaven.”
" Our Lord and Savior lifted up his voice and said with incomparable majesty:
‘Let all men know that grace comes after tribulation. Let them know that without the burden of afflictions it is impossible to reach the height of grace. Let them know that the gifts of grace increase as the struggles increase. Let men take care not to stray and be deceived. This is the only true stairway to paradise, and without the cross they can find no road to climb to heaven.’ "
" When I heard these words, a strong force came upon me and seemed to place me in the middle of a street, so that I might say in a loud voice to people of every age, sex and status: ‘Hear, O people; hear, O nations. I am warning you about the commandment of Christ by using words that came from his own lips: We cannot obtain grace unless we suffer afflictions. We must heap trouble upon trouble to attain a deep anticipation in the divine nature, the glory of the sons of God and perfect happiness of soul.’ "
The next time I should contemplate this I should feel so unworthy in complaining about my own sufferings in this wretched world.
 
I think everybody should read this:
unhealthydevotions.com/new-age/vows-to-become-victim-soul.htm

Besides, I cannot understand why would someone see such horrors with admiration and agree that “it was the Lady’s request” (telling innocent children that they must be tortured and die to appease God’s wrath?) This seems rather delusional or plain evil:
fatimacrusader.com/cr66/cr66pg33.asp

And this unhealthy thinking about an angry God “requesting” more and more victim souls seems to flourish and even to serve as an universal explanation for everything we don’t understand:
Sometimes not even Masses nor prayers can help the purgatorial souls. For instance: Our Lady said in Fatima that some girl called Amelia would be in purgatory until the end of the world, therefore, purgatory cannot be completely and entirely emptied via prayers and Masses but only through the end of the world. Certain souls perhaps want to spend there time in purgatory because they know that they can do much more through their suffering. The reason why the children of Fatima have attained their heaven rather than Amelia who will have her purgatory until the end of the world, perhaps Amelia was chosen by God to suffer for the sins of the whole world. Purgatory is metaphysically a spiritual thirst to interceed for the will of God. Souls want purgatory because they love to suffer. What seems as a temperory punishment is not a punishment at all, but a equaliberium, a balancing of the account of sins. Certain souls will spend their purgatory until the end of the world for the sake of the sins of the whole world, not all, but the ones God has chosen.
:eek:
catholicnewsagency.com/column.php?n=2349
 
There is no such thing as Victim Soul.In the 2,000 years of Christianity^s existence,wild & wacky ideas come to the forefront sometimes & abuses take place.Whether its the medeval belief that whipping yourself till you bleed is pleasing to God or that pursuit of suffering is of God^s pleasue. Clothing the naked,helping the poor,visting widows or the lonely,forgiving your brethren etc is what God calls u to do.James teaches that true religion is what I just said. Penance is to be done in a healthy reasnable manner.That is what is pleasing to God
 
Remember Lucy was a fraud.All that she claimed—purgatory,hell,coming of World War II was nowhere to be found in the original 1917 message.Its a product of twenty years latter from her memoirs.She prohesiezed the coming of WWII & her cousins dying in 1920—AFTER THE EVENTS took place. Theologians were so surprised at how different her claims were 20 years later as opposed to the simpler fatima message of 1917(prayer,penance,building a church) that theologians called this fatima II. Her tales grew longer & wider as time went on.People who knew her as a kid knew she was a purveyor of storytelling
 
Justice is good.

Punishment is part of justice, so punishment is good.

Everytime God punishes someone you should be on God’s side, rather than reacting against it. This society raises people to hate all punishment, it’s the error of the spirit of the age that has to be corrected. Not a good spirit.

It takes some emotional conversion for some to realize this. When you realize it, you realize taking the punishment due someone else upon yourself is good, because you bear what someone else has difficulty bearing and become more Christlike, which is rewarded in Heaven.

‘Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh, for his body, which is the church:’

Colossians 1:24

In Heaven the saints approve of justice:

“That the saints may enjoy their beatitude and the grace of God more richly, a perfect sight of the punishment of the damned is granted them.”

St. Thomas Aquinas

In purgatory the holy souls approve of the justice due themselves:

‘The same fire torments the damned in hell and the just in purgatory…The least pain in purgatory exceeds the greatest in this life.’

St. Thomas Aquinas

Sin deserves justice because it is so grievous and great. We learn how much it deserves it by loving God. The more we love God the more we hate the least sin against Him. By this method we learn how just and good justice itself is, and approve of it.

St. Anselm of Canterbury’s book ‘Why God Became Man’ explains justice very well.

The scriptures are full of Justice. When we love God’s justice for the sake of love of Him, they are all read in a new light – The Old Testament, Revelation… the warnings of Christ ‘Repent!’… And why Christ suffers…

And why we love to suffer -in- Him… and -with- Him. 🙂
I don’t pretend to fully understand all the spiritual intricacies surrounding “Victim Souls” completely. I do however like what you have wriiten here. But I do believe when you study the writings of many of the Great Saints and Doctors of the Church you get a wider understanding about whats involved in accepting the crucible of suffering in Christ coupled with mortification of the primitive human senses and that of being rightfully chastised for our folly in the flesh. In many ways devout followers of Christ all become Victim Souls in taking up their Cross with some human souls graced in paradoxical blessing to carry heavier crosses.

Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Hebrews Chapter 12: 1-15
drbo.org/chapter/65012.htm

Haydock’s Catholic Bible Commentary, 1859 edition.
haydock1859.tripod.com/id256.html
Commentary section
Verses 5-15
 
Jesus Christ Healed & alleviated suffering,he also said take my burden for it is light.The psalms are filled with pleading god to deliver them & heal them from suffering &
the psalms are filled with praise Of God in doing so. Paul referred to suffering because he was spreading the Gospel to hostile peoples but he didn^t purposely seek out suffering.Some of the saints were not there mentally----St gemma rolling in a field of thorns for penance is insane.St francis sleeping on a wood mattress & resting his head on a wood log to sleep has nothing to do with holiness.:cool::cool::cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top