G
Guy355
Guest
Can I be a good Catholic and at the same time play violent video games Only for entertainment? 
I invite you to check my posts on a similar thread:Can I be a good Catholic and at the same time play violent video games Only for entertainment?![]()
Yes. As long as it does not become an obsession.Can I be a good Catholic and at the same time play violent video games Only for entertainment?![]()
Of course. Same thing happened to meCan I be a good Catholic and at the same time play violent video games Only for entertainment?![]()
I disagree. Even if you donāt copy them, they are still affecting your mind and changing the way you think about violence. For instance, they may make one less concerned about or disgusted by violence. There may be some situations where desensitizing someone to violence could be a good thing, but for the most part it simply means we are less likely to take action to stop violence when we see it in the real world.To put it bluntly, any form of entertainment that involves violence is OK so long as you donāt copy the things you do in the virtual world.
Thisā¦Are such games drawing you closer to God, stimulating you toward good things, or providing reasonable leisure?
Only you can answer this.
Spec Ops is also anti-American and anti-military, so yeah I donāt think it deserves the praise it gets.Okay, so Iām actually a game designer/game journalist of sorts for my college and I donāt think that what games you play should determine your faith.
Truth be told, Iām agnostic but look at games like this, they are on the same artistic expression as movies, books, pictures, and comics except games go the extra mile of PUTTING the player into the seats of the awesome main characters, pitting them in the struggles created by the developers. I mean, people read the bible and thatās actually pretty violent, so if thatās accepted by Christianity, then why not play games that can expand your thinking and meditation? I mean, I played a game with a bunch of squares and I was crying my eyes out because video games are a communication of ideas along with being a form of entertainment.
Iām kind of glad that I found at least ONE video game thread XD.
Although, if you play games and they differ from your original beliefs and you believe them, well, if you want to stay a good Catholic, you have to think of video games differently. You canāt think of them as violent and crude games that make you feel disgusting, there is emotional depth in every game with messages that actually make sense.
Here are some examples of WHY some games were made and WHY people play them.
Case study: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1
So, you know about the Call of Duty franchise, of course you have, over 20 million people do.
What does it tackle? Human weakness. We all want to feel powerful and thatās what MW does. But why do people want to feel powerful? Especially looking at todayās society. If we look at the āWe are the 99%ā, it gives off this feeling that people felt powerless to the millionaires, to the leaders, to the famous. People want to have power and Modern Warfare does that but with one added bonus, a gun. I mean, and Iāll mention this in the next case study, itās pretty restrictive in the US if you want a gun (yeah, Iām aware that a lot of people have guns, anyway) so why not play into male power fantasies and give them a gun?
Of course, I hate this game for what itās done to the industry as whole. Making everything stale and unappealing.
Case Study: Grand Theft Auto
Yes, everyone knows about the crazy amounts of blood, sex, and drugs this franchise has shown but look at it like this, how many restrictions are there in todayās society? I mean, you can even get thrown in jail for saying ONE dumb comment on facebook. With all of this stuff about security and the restrictions from gun control to even auto insurance policies, people turn to entertainment to let that stress out. Thus Grand Theft Auto was made. It was made during a time when people felt coddled and stressed and needed something to let loose. As people say itās just one crazy stupid game, WHY is it āstupidā? WHY is it ācrazyā? Because it was made with the intention to be a sort of stress reliever.
2 more examples to feel like I know what Iām talking about
Case Study: Spec Ops: The Line
Oh boy oh boy oh boy, this game. Remember what I said about Call of Duty? How itās a male power fantasy? Well I didnāt say that straight up, BUT I did mention how it stagnated the AAA games industry. Spec Ops, while shocking in everything it does, is a commentary ON THAT POWER FANTASY. Yes, you shoot people, but WHO do you shoot? In the game, you shoot OTHER AMERICAN SOLDIERS. Why? If you ever looked at military shooters that came out before Spec Ops and after Modern Warfare 1, who did you play against the most? People similar to yourself. Why were you an American Spec Op shooting American soldiers in Spec Ops: The Line? The developers made it that way AS A COMMENTARY TO HOW PEOPLE PLAY GAMES, TODAY. I never even PLAYED this game and I got that. The gameās stupidly easy but itās shockingly depressing that when you reach that end, you just want the nightmare to end. Thus, sometimes, violence can actually teach people something. Sometimes to make us look at ourselves to see how wrong we are, sometimes.
Case Study: Missile Command
This was the first game that anyone can ever consider a piece of art. Missile Command is game about defending cities from Missiles by shooting other Missiles to stop them. Sounds like missile interception. When did this game come out? 1982. Yes, this came out around the end of the Cold War but because it came out at such a time, nuclear threats were still an issue. The biggest part of this game is that, you always lose. Once defcon has reached a high enough point, everyone will eventually die to nuclear warfare. This shocked the creator for years, where he couldnāt sleep at night.
So yeah, if you have an open-mind to new ideas, youāll realize that most games actually have good messages/important reasons in them and why people play them. Itās a good exercise. It might even help you on your faith journey, and Iām saying this as someone who doesnāt generally believe in religion, anymore.
Here is an intelligent catholic answer:Can I be a good Catholic and at the same time play violent video games Only for entertainment?![]()
Video games
Question from D.Demsky on 5/5/2005:
I have recently seen a webpage that describes video{commputer}games that promote sex or violence a venial sin or immperfection as it makes no indication which is which in its list of sins.I have a collection of 1st person shooting games{soilder and science fiction}, a Zombie shooting game ,and two sword in a dungeon type games[Champions of Norrath] that I am getting ready to sell because of that list.Are these games venial sin?
Answer by Colin B. Donovan, STL on 6/7/2005:
Venial sin is any imperfection of a good act, or a mortally sinful act done imperfectly (without full knowledge or intention).
A morally good act is one that is good in its object (the act itself), intention and circumstances. When it comes to recreation - watching television or movies, listening to music, reading books, surfing the internet, playing games (video or otherwise), etc., the same theology applies. There are two questions therefore. 1) Is the recreation wholesome in itself, that is, is it morally good or at least indifferent. 2) If morally good or indifferent, is it done well, that is, with a good intention and in appropriate circumstances?
- The Act Itself. To watch TV, listen to video, read, or play games is not itself evil. Certainly, certain kinds of content can be an occasion of sin. In my opinion, this is the problem with many video games, which rely on violence, sexuality and occultism to entertain. However, just as such content in movies can within limits serve a morally good end, it can do so in a game. A shooting game that is essentially target practice could be justified, even a war game that tests strategy and tactics. A shooting game which relies on mayhem and bloodiness is not morally or mentally healthy, however. Thus, although as a general rule violence in movies or games does not generally lead to sin, over time it can deaden our moral sense, as the connection between screen violence and violent crime shows.
Less slow is the effect of sexualized and occult oriented movies and games. For instance, one may never promote the occult as a morally valid option. Worse, still, involvement in occult things can invite the immediate participation of spirits, even contrary to oneās intentions, or incline one to seek informatio nabout that world. Games which use occult ideas within a game wholely internal to the gameboard are bad enough. Gravely evil are those which actually appeal to the occult world, such as the Ouiji Board, though some may have used it innocent of this intention. As for sexualized games, a game whose effect was to arouse lust in most people would be gravely sinful.
source: ewtn.com/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=438460&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu=
- The Intention and Circumstances. Even good recreation can become sinful by its use. To play a game for vainglory, or revenge or uncharitable motives, would be sinful, even mortally (if, for example, hatred of the opponent was involved). Likewise, to play games in inappropriate cicumstances, for example, when we should be studying, or fulfilling work or family responsibilities, is morally wrong. Generally, the sin would be venial, unless there were some aggravating circumstance. If playing games deprived your employer of substantial services (grand theft), or if gaming cost a person money needed to feed and house their family, the sin would even be mortal.