Well, true, but there’s nothing stopping us from taking a nugget of traditional teaching and, while keeping in mind the rest of tradition, drawing it out over time into a deeper knowledge by following all means of logic given to us. But it’s not necessary for salvation, not at all. I guess that’s what they call theologoumena. Vary explanations of Sacred Tradition that aren’t dogma in and of themselves.
Scientifically we know that male chromosomes were needed according to the laws of nature. I would imagine that God worked a creative miracle, like that at the resurrection, to begin the process of mitosis in the egg and then affixed himself within body inseparably bound to the human soul. Or something, I have no clue about that part. Which makes his day of conception spiritually the eighth day in line with Genesis. Which is probably part of the reason why John makes allusion to Genesis in the beginning (pun intended) of his gospel.
I love it when I talk to people and accidentally teach myself something new!
Also, perhaps Adam’s side really does pass on the Original Sin. Jesus had no human father and was free of it, but IDK.
