Virtue Masculine • Wisdom Feminine Wis 1:1-7

  • Thread starter Thread starter atassina
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

atassina

Guest
wisdom will not enter a deceitful soul, nor dwell in a body enslaved to sin.

Love virtue, you who are judges on the earth, let honesty prompt your thinking about the Lord, seek him in simplicity of heart; since he is to be found by those who do not put him to the test. . .Wisdom is a spirit. . .though she will not pardon the sins of the blasphemer…

Does the original Hebrew indicate that virtue is masculine and wisdom is feminine?
 
It’s actually Greek, but the point is the same.

The fun thing about many languages other than English (at least a fourth of the world’s languages, in fact) is that nouns are classified according to gender. Note though that nouns are assigned to gender largely without any semantic basis, in other words not really based on any feature (such as animacy or sex) of the person or thing that a noun represents.

Look at Spanish, for example (where nouns are either ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine’). In Spanish, miembro (‘member’) is also used for a woman even though it is a masculine noun; same goes for persona (‘person’), a feminine noun. Words like médico (doctor), oso (bear) or Lunes (Monday) are grammatically masculine, while silla (chair), mano (hand), or generosidad (generosity) are feminine. Now we know that days of the week or generosity or hands don’t really have any actual genders! 😉 (Spanish is one of those languages that are descended from Latin like French or Italian or Portuguese, which we would call the Romance languages. Latin itself had three grammatical genders: masculine, feminine, and neuter. The neuter was lost when Latin evolved into the Romance languages, with the result that only the masculine and the feminine remain.)

Greek and Hebrew are also languages which classify nouns by ‘gender’: Hebrew divides nouns into masculine and feminine, while Greek, in addition to those two, has neuter nouns just like Latin.

In both Greek and Hebrew, the words for “wisdom” (ḥokhmah and sophia) are grammatically feminine, which much explains why Wisdom is personified as a woman. (Here’s another one: the Greek word for church, ekklēsia, is a feminine noun. Hence the reason why we also personify the Church as a woman and a mother.)

Meanwhile the Greek for “righteousness,” “justice” or “virtue,” dikaiosynē, is feminine, so the “he” doesn’t refer to it. In this case, the “him” refers to “the Lord” mentioned immediately before. In other words, “seek the Lord in simplicity of heart.”
 
Cowabunga! You did it. I understand. No further inquiry, no more questions. Great analysis.

PS. 東日本 Do you live in China?
 
Thanks Patrick. I realized my mistake after I plugged the Japanese characters into Google translate. Amazing, we are getting closer and closer to the universal translator from the 1960s Star Trek. A
 
I have another interesting example: the word for ‘wind’, ‘breath’ or ‘spirit’. The Hebrew word, ruah, is a feminine noun, while the Greek pneuma is neuter. (Latin spiritus is grammatically a ‘he;’ so three words meaning the same thing but having different genders!)

Here’s the fun thing: pneuma is a neuter noun, so the grammatically proper way of referring to it is ‘it;’ however there are a few instances in the New Testament where pneuma is apparently taken as a ‘he,’ mainly in John’s gospel. John does use ‘it’, but he also links pneuma with the masculine noun paraklētos and - contrary to grammar - masculine pronouns.

As I’ve said though grammatical gender doesn’t always match up with a person or thing’s actual gender (or lack thereof): Greek paidion ‘kid’ (as in infant or young child) is neuter, but artos ‘bread’ is masculine.

The only problem that remains is how we could get machine translators to translate stuff grammatically perfectly. 😛
 
Thanks Patrick. I understand the distinction you are making between grammatical gender and human gender. Why we humans do this is a matter of study in the field of psycholinguistics; I have taken a psycholinguistics course about 20 years ago.

I heard that St. Epiphanius of Salamis (314-403) asserts that there are motherly qualities to the Holy Spirit. I heard it on Catholic Answers as a passing comment- have no references.

So, I suppose that if every father receives his fatherhood from the one Father, every mother receives her motherhood from??? The Holy Spirit?

平和と神があなたを祝福でなければ
 
Thanks Patrick. I understand the distinction you are making between grammatical gender and human gender. Why we humans do this is a matter of study in the field of psycholinguistics; I have taken a psycholinguistics course about 20 years ago.

I heard that St. Epiphanius of Salamis (314-403) asserts that there are motherly qualities to the Holy Spirit. I heard it on Catholic Answers as a passing comment- have no references.

So, I suppose that if every father receives his fatherhood from the one Father, every mother receives her motherhood from??? The Holy Spirit?
Just to expand on/correct my earlier post: to be more exact, Hebrew rûaḥ is one of those special nouns that can either be feminine or masculine. In the OT it is mostly considered as a feminine noun (say, in Genesis 1:2 “the rûaḥ of God was hovering over the face of the waters”), but there are also a few instances where the word is grammatically masculine (for example, Genesis 6:3 “My rûaḥ shall not abide in man forever…” or 2 Samuel 23:2 “The rûaḥ of Yhwh speaks by me…”)

St. Epiphanius spoke Syriac, a form of Aramaic, which itself is a language related to Hebrew. (Arabic is another related language; all of these are known as the Semitic languages.) As in Hebrew, the Syriac word rūḥāʾ (rūḥō) is grammatically a ‘she’; BTW so is the Arabic rūḥ. This is why in some very early Christian literature written in Syriac, you can sometimes even find the Holy Spirit addressed as a “mother.” The apocryphal work known as the Acts of Thomas (3rd century) is peppered with such references. From roughly the same period, Aphrahat (c. 270-c. 345) wrote this once (Demonstrations 18.10 ‘On Virginity and Marital Continence’) commenting on Genesis 2:24:

Who is it who leaves father and mother to take a wife? The meaning is as follows: as long as a man has not taken a wife, he loves and reveres God his Father and the Holy Spirit his Mother, and he has no other love. But when a man takes a wife, then he leaves his (true) Father and his Mother.

After the 5th century, the use of terminology was reduced to a simile, under Greek influence: Syriac writers like Epiphanius occasionally compared the Holy Spirit to a mother, and liked to use the verb “to hover” (rahhef; cf. Genesis 1:2; Deuteronomy 32:11) to refer to the Spirit’s action. Nowadays, the proper noun rūḥo qadisho/rūḥā’ d-qudshā’ “Holy Spirit” is treated as masculine. Perhaps the “mother” imagery of the Holy Spirit wasn’t pursued further because pagan cults worshipping divine triads consisting of a father, mother and son was widespread in ancient Mesopotamia (for example, “our Lord and our Lady and the Son of our Lord and Lady”): to an outsider, calling the Holy Spirit “mother” combined with a belief in the Father and the Son wouldn’t make Christianity any different from these religions.

Of course, again, this doesn’t really indicate much about the Spirit’s femininity. After all, the Greek masculine noun Logos, the “Word” (as in, “In the beginning was the Word…”) was translated literally in Syriac with its equivalent, the feminine melta/melto, but as time went on melta itself when it means the “Word” came to be considered masculine as well. In any case, there are even some works where female imagery is symbolic applied to God Himself: the Godhead compared to a wetnurse (courtesy of St. Ephrem, another Syrian writer) and the Father’s breasts being milked! Anyways, Ephrem also warned:

If someone concentrates his attentions
solely on the metaphors used of God’s Majesty,
he abuses and misrepresents that Majesty
by means of these very metaphors with which God has clothed himself.

Apparently some Jewish Christian sects also considered the Holy Spirit along the same lines. In a lost work which the writer Origen (and St. Jerome) identifies as the “Gospel of the Hebrews” has Jesus narrating in its version of the temptation in the desert: “Even so did my mother, the Holy Spirit, take me by one of my hairs and carry me away on to the great mountain of Tabor.”

A gnostic work, the Gospel according to Philip (2nd century), attacks the orthodox idea of Mary conceiving by the power of the Spirit under the line of reasoning that if the Spirit is female, how could ‘She’ ever make Mary pregnant?

Some said, “Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit.” They are in error. They do not know what they are saying. When did a woman ever conceive by a woman? Mary is the virgin whom no power defiled. She is a great anathema to the Hebrews, who are the apostles and the apostolic men. This virgin whom no power defiled …] the powers defile themselves. And the Lord would not have said “My Father who is in Heaven” (Mt 16:17), unless he had had another father, but he would have said simply “My father”.​
平和と神があなたを祝福でなければ
主の平和があなたにありますように
 
主の平和があなたにありますように

Google translated this Japanese as “As shown in the peace of your main.” What is your human translation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top