Wanting Death Penalty

  • Thread starter Thread starter HabemusFrancis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fairwinds said:
this DNA dodge is the latest misdirection. not every crime is solved by DNA, so its a false argument to demand this evidence when its not required.

there’s not going to be any DNA evidence in cases where jailed drug lords order hits or continue to run their narco-trafficking using attorneys and family members as messengers, as the FBI report pointed out. 2011 National Gang Threat Assessment – Emerging Trends. if you have any contrary evidence showing this doesn’t happen, please let me know.

there wasn’t any DNA evidence when Omar Abdel-Rahman, jailed for planning the first WTC bombings used his attorney Lynne Stewart to pass messages to the outside, resulting in rioting and deaths. from wikipedia on Stewart: “Stewart was accused in the indictment of passing Rahman’s blessing for a resumption of terrorist operations to Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya members in Egypt after they inquired whether they should continue to honor a ceasefire agreement with the Egyptian government” see footnotes.

so those drug lords and OAR should have been executed.

you may commence hand wave excuses, explanations and special pleading.
Click to expand...
It is true not every crime is solved by DNA evidence. However, I was not asserting it should be demanded. My response was a general one and what I posted concerning DNA I was with regard to the fact - not the false argument - there are occasions when DNA evidence has been used and it has not only subject to human error but has intentionally been tampered with. In addition, DNA evidence was only one of the reasons I gave for being against the death penalty.

Just out of curiosity - why did you expect my response would entail hand wave excuses, explanations and special pleading?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top