Was Christ always fully man and fully God, even before Incarnation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter comrade1789
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The model of : two arms; two legs; torso; head with two eyes, a nose, a mouth two ears; arm with hands and five fingers in each hand; legs with feet and five toes to each foot etc etc.

Was a model that existed always - since - eternity. Because scripture tells us, let us make man in our own image and likeness…]

This is such because Jesus, the second person of the Most Holy Trinity, has always existed in this “model”.

It was the test and revelation that Lucifer and the fallen angels refused to serve and be subject to because a humble and loving God would choose to be born into a body created a little lower than the angels] yet the pure spirits would serve. It was too much for a perfect creation like lucifer to take…non serviam!

Only in the fulness of time did He take flesh and was born of the Immaculate Theotokos. This flesh He would then glorify with His ressurection.

it’s perfectly clear to me. I’m sorry if I haven’t explained it well…I’m just a mangy dog.
 
The model of : two arms; two legs; torso; head with two eyes, a nose, a mouth two ears; arm with hands and five fingers in each hand; legs with feet and five toes to each foot etc etc.

Was a model that existed always - since - eternity. Because scripture tells us, let us make man in our own image and likeness…]

This is such because Jesus, the second person of the Most Holy Trinity, has always existed in this “model”.
…Only in the fulness of time did He take flesh and was born of the Immaculate Theotokos…
.
If by “model” you mean “mental concept” or “blue print”, then its ok, but if you mean “mannequinn” then I don’t think it is correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top