V
Verbum_Caro
Guest
Cari,
What I am focusing on is what I would characterize as a faulty assumption: the idea that God somehow seeks love from us. He doesn’t. Our love for God does not add anything to God, but it does add something to us.
I point this out because your orginal question seemed to paint a situation something like this: God gave us free will so He could be loved from us. But free-will causes a whole lot of suffering! How selfish of God to do that just to get love from us!
God didn’t give us free will so that He could be loved by us. He gave us free will so that we could love Him (and others!), and thereby participate in His Being.
When I said that free-will is consistent with our natures I mean only that it is fitting that a personal entity would have the capacity to incline its itself towards objects. I am not prepared to go so far as to say that a person, by definition, would require free will. But there certainly is something abhorent in the idea of a person without it. Furthermore, because one of the powers of the rational soul is the intellect and which apprehends “being” as “truth”, it is fitting that there be a corresponding power of the soul, the will, which apprehends “being” as “good”, and thereby inclines towards it.
Thoughts?
Vc
What I am focusing on is what I would characterize as a faulty assumption: the idea that God somehow seeks love from us. He doesn’t. Our love for God does not add anything to God, but it does add something to us.
I point this out because your orginal question seemed to paint a situation something like this: God gave us free will so He could be loved from us. But free-will causes a whole lot of suffering! How selfish of God to do that just to get love from us!
God didn’t give us free will so that He could be loved by us. He gave us free will so that we could love Him (and others!), and thereby participate in His Being.
When I said that free-will is consistent with our natures I mean only that it is fitting that a personal entity would have the capacity to incline its itself towards objects. I am not prepared to go so far as to say that a person, by definition, would require free will. But there certainly is something abhorent in the idea of a person without it. Furthermore, because one of the powers of the rational soul is the intellect and which apprehends “being” as “truth”, it is fitting that there be a corresponding power of the soul, the will, which apprehends “being” as “good”, and thereby inclines towards it.
Thoughts?
Vc