Was Jesus arrested and crucified in the same day?

  • Thread starter Thread starter farpinho
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

farpinho

Guest
I’m really a bit confused now. I hadn’t thought about this before, until a friend just argued to me that there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to be crucified about 9 am.
If Jesus was arrested by the previous night, then he was taken to Anas, then to Caiphas where He stayed until the morning. Then they took Him to the Sanhedrin (which was a very long trial), then to Pilates, Herod, then to Pilates again. After that Jesus was presented to the multitude, He was punished by the Jews and the Romans. How could it have possibly happened in just 3 hours? :confused:
Only solution I can see is that the crucifixion and the trial didn’t happen at the same day, as thought. Any other ideas? :confused:
Thank you.
 
One thing to remember is that days were counted from sundown to sundown, so the day begins roughly at 6pm, and morning was the middle of the day, not the beginning. So to be crucified by 9 am it was roughly 15 hours into the day, not 9 like ours.
 
I’m really a bit confused now. I hadn’t thought about this before, until a friend just argued to me that there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to be crucified about 9 am.
If Jesus was arrested by the previous night, then he was taken to Anas, then to Caiphas where He stayed until the morning. Then they took Him to the Sanhedrin (which was a very long trial), then to Pilates, Herod, then to Pilates again. After that Jesus was presented to the multitude, He was punished by the Jews and the Romans. How could it have possibly happened in just 3 hours? :confused:
Only solution I can see is that the crucifixion and the trial didn’t happen at the same day, as thought. Any other ideas? :confused:
Thank you.
Well, Jesus was arrested somewhere at night, was interrogated by the chief priests and (implied to be) detained until dawn, at which point the council reached a decision and sent Him to Pilate to be judged. Traditionally it is assumed to take place overnight, but your idea that a greater amount of time elapsed is also proposed by a few people today.

Personally I don’t see much difficulty in the conventional idea. What exactly is your gripe with it?
 
I’m really a bit confused now. I hadn’t thought about this before, until a friend just argued to me that there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to be crucified about 9 am.
If Jesus was arrested by the previous night, then he was taken to Anas, then to Caiphas where He stayed until the morning. Then they took Him to the Sanhedrin (which was a very long trial), then to Pilates, Herod, then to Pilates again. After that Jesus was presented to the multitude, He was punished by the Jews and the Romans. How could it have possibly happened in just 3 hours? :confused:
Only solution I can see is that the crucifixion and the trial didn’t happen at the same day, as thought. Any other ideas? :confused:
Thank you.
The trial before the Sanhedrin took place during the night, or at least before dawn, since Peter’s denial of the Lord marks the end of the trial, and happens immediately before the rooster crows for the dawn (Matthew 26:57-75; Mark 14:53-72; John 18:15-27, although John does not precisely mention the Sanhedrin).

Luke 22:54-71 seems to contradict the others, recording Peter’s denial first, then giving an abbreviated version of the trial, specifying that they gathered at daybreak. Perhaps we can question whether they began to meet before or after the sun rose…
 
I’m really a bit confused now. I hadn’t thought about this before, until a friend just argued to me that there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to be crucified about 9 am.
If Jesus was arrested by the previous night, then he was taken to Anas, then to Caiphas where He stayed until the morning. Then they took Him to the Sanhedrin (which was a very long trial), then to Pilates, Herod, then to Pilates again. After that Jesus was presented to the multitude, He was punished by the Jews and the Romans. How could it have possibly happened in just 3 hours? :confused:
Only solution I can see is that the crucifixion and the trial didn’t happen at the same day, as thought. Any other ideas? :confused:
Thank you.
Jesus was crucified at noon and died at 3 PM.
 
Jesus was crucified at noon and died at 3 PM.
Mark mentions that Jesus was crucified during “the third hour” (9 AM), while John notes that Jesus was still in the praetorium about “the sixth hour” (12 PM). Either way we can infer that the crucifixion happened late in the morning or at about midday and that by the afternoon Jesus was dead.
 
I’m really a bit confused now. I hadn’t thought about this before, until a friend just argued to me that there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to be crucified about 9 am.
If Jesus was arrested by the previous night, then he was taken to Anas, then to Caiphas where He stayed until the morning. Then they took Him to the Sanhedrin (which was a very long trial), then to Pilates, Herod, then to Pilates again. After that Jesus was presented to the multitude, He was punished by the Jews and the Romans. How could it have possibly happened in just 3 hours? :confused:
Only solution I can see is that the crucifixion and the trial didn’t happen at the same day, as thought. Any other ideas? :confused:
Thank you.
In the classic book Who Moved the Stone? author Albert Henry Ross (pseudonym Frank Morison) makes some interesting points on this subject. One snippet that I found interesting was:

"To avoid any possibility of misunderstanding on a vital point, let me say here that I would be the very last to deny that fear of the people carried great weight with the Jewish leaders. No one knew, no one could know, what would be the political consequences of the forcible seizure of the person of One whom a large section of the populace regarded as the Messiah of prophecy. The whole situation was unprecendented, and one of extreme sensitiveness and delicacy. Everything these men did was done, as it were, with a furtive glance over the shoulder towards that unfathomable entity, the popular will.

But mere fear of the people does not explain some of the strangest things about the affair. Something Judas told the priests caused them to precipitate events at the last moment; to go through with the thing at a time that presented the maximum legal and official difficulties. It caused them to keep the strangest appointment between a wanted man and His persecutors of which history gives us any cognizance. It led them to send Him, and undefended man in a lonely and deserted garden at midnight, an imposing and even ridiculous display of force, supplemented by precautions, the meaning of which no one can mistake.

What does this all signify? Personally I am convinced that beneath the ostensible and acknowledged fear of the people, there was a deeper and more potent fear - a fear that explains all their singular hesitancies and vacillations, until a welcome message reached their astonished ears - the fear of Christ Himself.

Lest this should seem to be a strange and unfamiliar thought, let us look to the facts. It is impossible to dissociate these men from the mental limitations and superstitions of their age. Whether the reader believes that the miracles of Christ were actually performed or are merely the legendary ascriptions of a supersititous and unscientific age, the fact remains that the personal ascendancy and repute of Jesus during His own lifetime was immense. The stories of His cures of the blind, the paralytic, and the possessed were widespread. They came from all parts of the country and Jerusalem. The fact that He possessed certain definite powers beyond the normal does not seem to have been doubted by His contemporaries.

It is difficult to read the Gospels impartially, particularly the closing chapters, without realizing that the nimbus of mystery that encircled the person of Jesus reacted most powerfully on the plans of the leaders. They were dealing with an unknown and incalculable quantity, and their acts plainly show it. Throughout the four days that preceded the day of arrest, when, had He wished, Jesus could have raised the city to an unimaginable pitch of tumult and excitement, they behaved like men under the compulsion of some secret fear. There is none of that swift and decisive grappling with a dangerous situation that we might have expected from men occupying the seat of power. Hesitancy and vacillation are written upon their acts. Even after the terrific and scathing denunciation on Tuesday afternoon, they left the initiative with Christ. Indeed, it is one of the master facts of this strange narrative that the initiative remained with Christ even to the end.

Personally, I cannot avoid the feeling that, in all their dealings with Jesus, these men were apprehensive of something happening that they did not care to define. They seem to have been in some doubt whether even a considerable force would be adequate to take Him, and that in the last moment He might even prove to be unarrestable. This impression is unmistakably strengthened by their singular behavior in the matter of Judas…"
 
Well, Jesus was arrested somewhere at night, was interrogated by the chief priests and (implied to be) detained until dawn, at which point the council reached a decision and sent Him to Pilate to be judged. Traditionally it is assumed to take place overnight, but your idea that a greater amount of time elapsed is also proposed by a few people today.

Personally I don’t see much difficulty in the conventional idea. What exactly is your gripe with it?
I’m just really confused at the times the events took place. Like Spirithound said, the real question maybe is if they began to meet before or after the sun rose. But if they met before the sun rose and Jesus was crucified at around 11 am (harmonizing Mark with John) then there’s absolutely enough time for everything to happen.
 
People didn’t keep banker’s hours in those days.

There was no convenient source of light, so people went to bed early.

Most were up before the crack of dawn, probably around 5 am.

Plenty of time to make the time line in John work.
 
People didn’t keep banker’s hours in those days.

There was no convenient source of light, so people went to bed early.

Most were up before the crack of dawn, probably around 5 am.

Plenty of time to make the time line in John work.
👍
 
Not a big deal to me, personally. But how do you defend Jesus’ honor to skeptics who want to mock the Gospels?
…shoot…idk…I don’t see how Jesus’ honor is held up by any timeline…that’s like saying “well hold on!..it said in the news that the man who saved the world was 6 foot 1 but it’s clear that he was 5 foot 11!”…gimme a break…and now it’s our job as faithful men and women to help these people feel more comfortable with Christ?!..I guess we do…I guess that’s what the saviour asks of us…just kinda gets on my nerves. Bad mood I Guess.
 
…shoot…idk…I don’t see how Jesus’ honor is held up by any timeline…that’s like saying “well hold on!..it said in the news that the man who saved the world was 6 foot 1 but it’s clear that he was 5 foot 11!”…gimme a break…and now it’s our job as faithful men and women to help these people feel more comfortable with Christ?!..I guess we do…I guess that’s what the saviour asks of us…just kinda gets on my nerves. Bad mood I Guess.
I know how you feel… well, I get mocked all the time for being a Catholic 🙂
 
I know how you feel… well, I get mocked all the time for being a Catholic 🙂
Good. Take it as I like to say “chest first”… Ask for seconds. I seem to believe you should get mocked for being so far up into yourself that you literally think the bible should conform to YOU…the amazing thing is…it does…He just gives…keep up the good work:)

I’m learning a lot on this thread anyways…great job.
 
Not a big deal to me, personally. But how do you defend Jesus’ honor to skeptics who want to mock the Gospels?
Haters gonna hate! But you know, Jesus is often mocked, not for any supposed fairy-tale-ness of the Gospels, but by using the precise words in the Gospels. “If you are the Son of God, come down from that cross!” “He saved others, and yet he couldn’t save himself!” For the cross is a scandal to the unbeliever.

Lord, I believe. Help my unbelief.
 
I’m just really confused at the times the events took place. Like Spirithound said, the real question maybe is if they began to meet before or after the sun rose. But if they met before the sun rose and Jesus was crucified at around 11 am (harmonizing Mark with John) then there’s absolutely enough time for everything to happen.
Let’s look at the texts first:

Mark

And they led Jesus to the high priest. And all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes came together. (…) Now the chief priests and the whole council were seeking testimony against Jesus to put him to death, but they found none. For many bore false witness against him, but their testimony did not agree. And some stood up and bore false witness against him, saying, “We heard him say, ‘I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and in three days I will build another, not made with hands.’” Yet even about this their testimony did not agree. And the high priest stood up in the midst and asked Jesus, “Have you no answer to make? What is it that these men testify against you?” But he remained silent and made no answer. Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” And Jesus said, “I am, and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” And the high priest tore his garments and said, “What further witnesses do we need? You have heard his blasphemy. What is your decision?” And they all condemned him as deserving death. And some began to spit on him and to cover his face and to strike him, saying to him, “Prophesy!” And the guards received him with blows. (…) And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. (…) Pilate, wishing to satisfy the crowd, released for them Barabbas, and having scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.

Matthew

Then those who had seized Jesus led him to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders had gathered. (…) Now the chief priests and the whole council were seeking false testimony against Jesus that they might put him to death, but they found none, though many false witnesses came forward. At last two came forward and said, “This man said, ‘I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to rebuild it in three days.’” And the high priest stood up and said, “Have you no answer to make? What is it that these men testify against you?” But Jesus remained silent. And the high priest said to him, “I adjure you by the living God, tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God.” Jesus said to him, “You have said so. But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.” Then the high priest tore his robes and said, “He has uttered blasphemy. What further witnesses do we need? You have now heard his blasphemy. What is your judgment?” They answered, “He deserves death.” Then they spit in his face and struck him. And some slapped him, saying, “Prophesy to us, you Christ! Who is it that struck you?” (…) When morning came, all the chief priests and the elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. And they bound him and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate the governor. (…) Then he released for them Barabbas, and having scourged Jesus, delivered him to be crucified.

Luke

Then they seized him and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house (…) Now the men who were holding Jesus in custody were mocking him as they beat him. They also blindfolded him and kept asking him, “Prophesy! Who is it that struck you?” And they said many other things against him, blaspheming him. When day came, the assembly of the elders of the people gathered together, both chief priests and scribes. And they led him away to their council, and they said, “If you are the Christ, tell us.” But he said to them, “If I tell you, you will not believe, and if I ask you, you will not answer. But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God.” So they all said, “Are you the Son of God, then?” And he said to them, “You say that I am.” Then they said, “What further testimony do we need? We have heard it ourselves from his own lips.” Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. (…) He released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, for whom they asked, but he delivered Jesus over to their will.

John

So the band of soldiers and their captain and the officers of the Jews arrested Jesus and bound him. First they led him to Annas, for he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year. (…) The high priest then questioned Jesus about his disciples and his teaching. Jesus answered him, “I have spoken openly to the world. I have always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where all Jews come together. I have said nothing in secret. Why do you ask me? Ask those who have heard me what I said to them; they know what I said.” When he had said these things, one of the officers standing by struck Jesus with his hand, saying, “Is that how you answer the high priest?” Jesus answered him, “If what I said is wrong, bear witness about the wrong; but if what I said is right, why do you strike me?” Annas then sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest. (…) Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. (…) [Pilate] brought Jesus out and sat down on the judgment seat at a place called The Stone Pavement, and in Aramaic Gabbatha. Now it was the day of Preparation of the Passover. It was about the sixth hour. (…) He delivered him over to them to be crucified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top