B
Bezant
Guest
We know that Jesus was sinless, but does this mean he was or wasn’t capable of making inadvertent mistakes – the way you forget an item, for example?
Yes.We know that Jesus was sinless, but does this mean he was or wasn’t capable of making inadvertent mistakes – the way you forget an item, for example?
mistake does not equate to sin.
As to whether he made clear statements on Mary, or the Trinity those I would argue are not needed to be clear. He sent the Holy Spirit to reveal those when we were ready for them. The cure for cancer he gave us, we just don’t have enough faith to use it. Miracles happen every day, Jesus walked around curing people throughout his ministry.Assuming for the sake of the discussion that he was as portrayed in one or other of the Gospels, I think the failure to dictate a careful description of the nature of the Trinity and maybe the cure for cancer would count as mistakes. Also recruiting Judas and forgetting to make a clear statement on whether his mother is indeed the co-redemptrix would count as well.
Why is this any more logical than: “being both God and man, and man being an imperfect being, Jesus would have made mistakes”?Being both God and man and God being a perfect being, Jesus would not have made mistakes.
Why is this any more logical than: “being both God and man, and man being an imperfect being, Jesus would have made mistakes”?
Jesus didn’t come for philosophers and theologians! His teaching was moral and practical rather than metaphysical and abstract. It was sufficient to reveal that God is a loving Father who cares for all His children - which is the basis of modern civilisation with its principles of liberty, equality and** fraternity**.Assuming for the sake of the discussion that he was as portrayed in one or other of the Gospels, I think the failure to dictate a careful description of the nature of the Trinity and maybe the cure for cancer would count as mistakes. Also recruiting Judas and forgetting to make a clear statement on whether his mother is indeed the co-redemptrix would count as well.
I don’t think that’s what is meant here by a mistake. That’s more of not using his powers. A mistake would be more like: “Hey, Peter, go down to the market to buy some bread will ya? -five minutes later Oh, snap, I forgot to give him some cash!” or, perhaps, slightly irreverently, sprinkling while taking a leak or something.I am surpised and deeply disappointed at the number of responses that Jesus could not have made a mistake. Jesus was human like us in everything but sin. This involves making normal human mistakes.
To think otherwise seems inconsistent with the doctrine of the Incarnation.
Do those who think otherwise- do you believe the Jesus could run 100 meters in 8 seconds, or that the Cross was easy for Him to carry?
Even though he “knew” the true nature of God (because he was fully God), he wouldn’t be able to explain the Trinity because he had to use human images and language to describe it (because he was fully human) which is impossible.Assuming for the sake of the discussion that he was as portrayed in one or other of the Gospels, I think the failure to dictate a careful description of the nature of the Trinity and maybe the cure for cancer would count as mistakes. Also recruiting Judas and forgetting to make a clear statement on whether his mother is indeed the co-redemptrix would count as well.
Please elaborate on this. What cure for cancer is in the Bible?The cure for cancer he gave us, we just don’t have enough faith to use it. .
That’s very interesting. What information was revealed that wasn’t known at the time? Was it of an advanced scientific nature?in the Book of Enoch, God punishes the rebel angels for revealing things to us that we aren’t supposed to know and things that we were supposed to figure out on our own.
Yes of course He was capable, He was FULLY humanWe know that Jesus was sinless, but does this mean he was or wasn’t capable of making inadvertent mistakes – the way you forget an item, for example?