Was Jesus Gay---Probably---from an article in the Guardian

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneofmany
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2012/apr/20/was-jesus-gay-probably

This seems to be a gay agenda and it will never to away. 😦
Culture of death.

One should watch closely what comes out of the UK. There’s an anti Catholic bent in that nation. Some things are self destructive, are easily seen for what they are, and do not need to be called to anyone’s attention and are counter productive. They plead to be buried in the mire because corruption is their nature. We don’t put a rotting rat in our pocket to bring home to share with our loved ones. Stay away from such garbage, and don’t even give it the slightest notice.
 
I think this is more of a relection on modern life than homosexuality.

We have desceded so low that the modern man just assumes that since Jesus wasn’t married, he ā€œmustā€ have had sex with John.

To the modern man it is inconcievable that any one can survive without sex, so they paint Jesus as homosexual.
 
Why read such trash? I’ll believe Jesus was secretly married before I’ll believe He was gay (not that I subscribe to conspiracy theories).
 
Not all Buddhists worship Buddha. He wasn’t a god - he was just a guy who had some ideas about life.

Anyway, on topic, why do you guys care? In your view of Jesus, the one from your holy scripture, Jesus certainly isn’t gay. Why can’t you just ignore it as being nonsense?
Good point regularā€¦šŸ‘
 
I think this is more of a relection on modern life than homosexuality.

We have desceded so low that the modern man just assumes that since Jesus wasn’t married, he ā€œmustā€ have had sex with John.

To the modern man it is inconcievable that any one can survive without sex, so they paint Jesus as homosexual.
Also, the homosexualists are very obsessed with homosexuality.
So obsessed, that they will say such garbage.
 
Knowing homosexualists, they have a desire in either identifying homosexuals as the most persecuted people in history or that every famous person in history is a homosexual. And yet they claim that we are obsessed with homosexuality.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but rather believe the underlying general principle of your claim holds true for many groups with an agenda.
 
guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2012/apr/20/was-jesus-gay-probably

This seems to be a gay agenda and it will never to away. 😦
It’s most probably, if not certainly, a ridiculous claim. We know so little about the life of Jesus that how in the world would anyone know about such a private aspect? Besides, it fits in with the current speculation about so many people’s sexual lives, both historical figures and present-day celebrities, that it seems like just another example of sensationalism designed to arouse the prurient interest of the general public.
 
For those not familiar with the Guardian; it is a British newspaper that has been very anti Christian for years. It ruthlessly promotes the gay agenda.
P.S. It is also paranoid in its loathing for Catholicism.
 
For those not familiar with the Guardian; it is a British newspaper that has been very anti Christian for years. It ruthlessly promotes the gay agenda.
P.S. It is also paranoid in its loathing for Catholicism.
Not to mention its editorial staff lives, eats, and breathes relativism, anti-Westernism and radical feminism.
 
If Jesus was gay, then clearly he was not the Messiah for Jesus was the Living Word (ie the Torah in flesh). The Torah forbid adultery which is what homosexuality is. If the chaplain’s heresy is true, then he is a hypocrite for believing and preaching a false doctrine and false Messiah.

Thankfully no sane Christian agrees with this heretic or his heretical position.
 
If Jesus was gay, then clearly he was not the Messiah for Jesus was the Living Word (ie the Torah in flesh). The Torah forbid adultery which is what homosexuality is. If the chaplain’s heresy is true, then he is a hypocrite for believing and preaching a false doctrine and false Messiah.

Thankfully no sane Christian agrees with this heretic or his heretical position.
In what sense is homosexuality a form of adultery?
 
More properly put, homosexual activity is fornication, which is a grave sin in the Catholic Church. In fact, since the Catholic Church does not recognize same sex ā€œmarriageā€ then it is impossible for two people of the same gender to engage in sexual activity without committing fornication, whether or not they consider themselves to be ā€œmarried.ā€

As far as the author of the article in the Guardian goes, I would say, to be kind, that he is very confused. Of course, the Anglican split over issues such as ordination of women, same sex marriage, etc. has proved to be a boon for the Catholic Church as it has driven some Anglican priests and congregations back into the fold of the one true Church.šŸ‘
 
Not to mention its editorial staff lives, eats, and breathes relativism, anti-Westernism and radical feminism.
Yes, their bias in running this lurid fantasy is transparent. The author even mentions that Jesus could have been celibate, but dismisses this because, he claims, there is no Jewish tradition of celibacy. Since when is Jesus Christ to be strictly held to Jewish tradition? And since He is true man, true God, how could it be the least bit difficult for Him to be celibate? The author asserts that because Jesus was a man as well as God, He wouldn’t have been able to control Himself. Rubbish!:mad:

This ā€œchaplainā€ needs some serious counseling and perhaps a long sabbatical, since his words clearly imply doubt regarding the sinlessness of Christ. Most likely, his article reflects his own yearnings.
 
At some point I will simply have to give up all media due to an overload of homosexuality. One would think, based on the level of obsession, that at least 90% of the human race was gay. I am not only opposed to the gay agenda, I am sick and tired of it beyond my ability to describe. At this point, my fatigue of it has used up whatever compassion I used to be able to rouse for people afflicted with that temptation.
 
In what sense is homosexuality a form of adultery?
I should have said ā€œabominationā€ my mistake.

Vayikra 18:22 ā€œThou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination.ā€
 
And this is precisely why thousands showed up at Chick-fil-A to protest with their dollars and support a business that is not bowing to the gay agenda.
 
And this is precisely why thousands showed up at Chick-fil-A to protest with their dollars and support a business that is not bowing to the gay agenda.
Really? I thought it was because of the Chicken and the ā€œspecial sauceā€ šŸ˜›
 
I should have said ā€œabominationā€ my mistake.

Vayikra 18:22 ā€œThou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination.ā€
ā€œVayikraā€? What language is that? (I assume it means Leviticus.)
 
At some point I will simply have to give up all media due to an overload of homosexuality. One would think, based on the level of obsession, that at least 90% of the human race was gay. I am not only opposed to the gay agenda, I am sick and tired of it beyond my ability to describe. At this point, my fatigue of it has used up whatever compassion I used to be able to rouse for people afflicted with that temptation.
Less than 2% of the population is actively homosexual. Ask someone to guess, they will guess in the 15-25% range.

Why? Because it is so shoved into our faces that it looks like just another lifestyle. Almost normal.

Propaganda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top