Was Jesus Really Born on December 25? Here's the Intriguing Evidence

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting. Thanks for that. I also remember the Census ordered by Caesar Augustus put The Holy Family in the geographic area of Bethlehem in Dec according to Roman records.
 
Sorry to disappoint you, Spencer, but your Church Pop website fails to deliver on its promise to explain the significance of December 25.

First, they believed that Jesus was crucified on March 25th (given when Passover normally falls), and there was a tradition that Jesus died the same day he first entered the world (his conception). Nine month later from March 25th is December 25th.

On this first point, the writer is correct about the generalized belief in the ancient world that great people lived an exact number of years, dying on the anniversary of their conception. It may even be true that this is the real reason why we celebrate Christmas on December 25. But, of course, it is of no help at all in establishing the historical date on which Jesus was born.

Second, and most importantly, Scripture provides strong evidence that December 25th, or a date near that, is when Jesus was born.
The Gospel of Luke tells us the angel Gabriel revealed to Zechariah that his wife Elizabeth would conceive John the Baptist while Zechariah was performing his priestly duties on the Day of Atonement, also known as Yom Kippur. That Jewish holy day always falls in late September or early October.

This second point is plain wrong. Luke’s Gospel does not say that Zechariah was performing his priestly duties ”on the Day of Atonement, also known as Yom Kippur.” The date isn’t mentioned at all.

All male descendants of Aaron were priests, entitled to officiate at the Temple sacrifices. They were divided into twenty-four groups, each of which served twice a year for a week at a time. Zechariah’s encounter with the angel Gabriel could have happened on any day of the year. We are not told the date. Luke says nothing about the time of year.
 
Last edited:
“Your” actually, the website is owned by EWTN. Not sure why you’re talking to the OP like that
 
Last edited:
First of all, it doesn’t matter. Jesus could have been born on Dec 25th, April 1st, or May 19th, or July 1st. Whatever. We commemorate his birthday on Dec. 25th, as good a day as any, especially since it works well with the seasons (in the Northern Hemisphere, sorry southerners!) and the birth of St. John the Baptist on June 24th.

That said, that’s a stretch claimed in the article, that Zechariah was officiating at the Day of Atonement. There’s nothing in the text that necessitates such an interpretation. The incense sacrifice was daily, and there is no indication of any ceremony that uniquely identifies Zechariah’s event as Yom Kippur. There is nothing to indicate that this was anything more than the daily sacrifice of incense, and it was Zechariah’s lot to perform the burning and the prayers.
 
Yes, the writer of this article make assumptions that are clearly unsupported. I say, Bah! Humbug! I celebrate the fact of the Incarnation on the day when the Church says to celebrate it, but I believe that there is only one chance in 365 that He was actually born on that date.

D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top