D
deondre
Guest
I was taught in my church growing up that James was the brother of Jesus
On the contrary, Scripture is clear that the brothers and sisters of Jesus are actually His cousins. One of the problems with Sola Scriptura is that everyone interprets the Scriptures according to their own ability. Therefore, Sola Scripturists never consider cultural and historical circumstances in regards to translations. For a Sola Scripturist, a “brother” is always a “brother of the womb”. Never mind that they, themselves, call each other “brothers in Christ” all the time. And they speak of “Brother Joe” and “Sister Jane” all the time.I was taught in my church growing up that James was the brother of Jesus
Check out the Protoevangelium of James…Joseph was an older man and there was a chance he could have been a widower with children. Now was he certain of course not, for there is not much we know of Joseph’s life other than he was there for Jesus and Mary when he was so needed.
Well it depends on what type of evidence you are willing to look at and think about.can you provide any evidence that she remained a virgin and did not give birth to any children after?
This is nuptial language here, making Mary the spouse of the Holy Spirit.Luke 1:35 The angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born[d] will be holy; he will be called Son of God.
When Mary became pregnant she was considered an adulteress under the letter of the law. This is why Joseph wanted to divorce her quietly.After betrothal the parties were regarded as man and wife; and the act could be dissolved only by death or by a formal bill of divorce. If the woman proved unfaithful during the period of betrothal she was treated as an adulteress, and her punishment (that of stoning; Deut. xxii. 23, 24; Sanh. 66b) was considered to be much more severe than that (strangulation) inflicted upon the unfaithful married woman (Deut. xxii. 22; Sanh. 52b). The parties were not, however, entitled to conjugal rights, nor were they bound by the obligations of married life (see Husband and Wife).
@Deondre,baptist, im sure many other protestants are raised hearing the same thing
Two thoughts: first off, is the Bible the only place where we can look? I mean, I know that the Bible is “profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction”, but does that mean that the Bible is the only source for these? (After all, not even Jesus said “give them Scriptures” – He said to the apostles that they were to teach His disciples in every nation!) So, I think it would be fair game to look at the writings of learned and respected leaders in the early Church, to see what they had to say. Now, naturally, we wouldn’t call their writings “inerrant”, and would have to discern them, but still… does the Bible say that the Bible is the only source of knowledge?provide me evidence. bible verse, along with contextual support