H
hmikell7
Guest
I’m currently reading through the Penguin Classics edition of Eusebius’ ”The History of the Church”, translated by G.A. Williamson. I’m having some trouble with some of the footnotes in his translation. On one page where Eusebius is talking about how there was another Cephas besides St. Peter who was guilty of some pretty serious iniquities Williamson says in the footnotes that Eusebius was mistaken. He provides no evidence for this, he just says that the author was wrong. I didn’t make too much of a big deal out of it until I came across the following passage:
Am I just making a big deal out of nothing, or is there a bit of a bias against the Catholic Church on the translator’s part? Does anyone else know something I don’t regarding the terminology used by the early Christians? Was the Church ever referred to as the ‘Virgin Mother’?
The footnote for the passage referencing the Virgin Mother claimed that the term Virgin Mother was referring not to Mary but rather to the Church itself. I searched for a good twenty minutes for any evidence at all that early Christians had used this term to refer to the Church, but couldn’t find any outside of the translator’s own writings.and martyrs were bestowing graces on those who had failed to be martyrs, and there was great joy in the heart of the Virgin Mother, who was receiving her stillborn children back alive.
Am I just making a big deal out of nothing, or is there a bit of a bias against the Catholic Church on the translator’s part? Does anyone else know something I don’t regarding the terminology used by the early Christians? Was the Church ever referred to as the ‘Virgin Mother’?
Last edited: